The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
Mews blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support — vooral voor independent accommodaties (4.9/5) , met exclusieve functies zoals Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Persefone blinkt uit .
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 887 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 887 | 0 |
Na analyse van 887 geverifieerde beoordelingen waarderen Mews-gebruikers vooral de ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, terwijl Persefone-gebruikers de benadrukken. Klik op een thema om te zien wat beoordelaars zeggen.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Voordelen | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Inwerken en ondersteuning
▾
|
|
| Nadelen | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapportage en analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Hoe elk product scoort onder Vastgoedbeheersystemen-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | #3 329 beoordelingen | — |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | #1 397 beoordelingen | — |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) ▾ | #3 45 beoordelingen | — |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) ▾ | #3 49 beoordelingen | — |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 beoordelingen | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 beoordelingen | — |
| Merk / Keten ▾ | #2 170 beoordelingen | — |
| Langverblijf ▾ | #1 130 beoordelingen | — |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | #8 106 beoordelingen | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 beoordelingen | — |
| Azië-Pacific ▾ | #10 17 beoordelingen | — |
| Midden-Oosten ▾ | #28 8 beoordelingen | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Persefone by Persefone hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience, while Persefone offers a more traditional, all-in-one platform with a strong Italian legacy. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s current stage and future plans?
Mews is a cloud-native property management system with a high user rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations. Persefone, with over 17 years in the market and more than 3,000 hotels served, is a European-based system renowned for its comprehensive suite of features and reliable support but has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings. Does your hotel prioritize innovative technology and a broad ecosystem, or do you prefer a proven, integrated package with long-term stability?
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a modern, flexible platform favored by boutique, hostel, and city-center hotels, whereas Persefone’s reputation is built on stability and a full set of features, mostly appreciated by Italian hotels. Are you seeking a cutting-edge, scalable system or a tried-and-true solution with deep local expertise?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, go with Mews. Its recent review count and ratings demonstrate active adoption and ongoing improvements, making it ideal for hotels aiming to modernize operations quickly.
If your hotel prefers a traditional, all-in-one software suite with extensive features designed for the Italian market, Persefone might suit your needs better. Its long-standing presence and integrated approach appeal to hotels that value stability and a comprehensive management tool, especially if they operate primarily in Italy or similar markets.
For fast-growing hotels seeking agility, Mews’s open API, marketplace, and rapid innovation are unmatched. Conversely, if you prioritize a fully integrated, regional solution with a history of serving thousands of hotels, Persefone’s deep feature set and support may be advantageous.
Mews boasts a user rating of 4.7/5 for ease of use across 679 reviews, with many hoteliers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and modern design. Recent feedback highlights its simple reservation dashboards, guest messaging, and remote access, supporting staff of all tech skill levels.
Persefone has not publicly shared a recent ease-of-use rating or detailed user feedback, but its long history suggests a traditional, feature-rich interface that may require more training and adaptation, especially for staff unfamiliar with legacy systems. Is your team ready for a modern, user-centric platform or better served by a familiar, all-in-one interface?
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 49 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, automated night audit, guest app, real-time reporting, shift planning, and more. Its broad suite is designed to improve operational agility and guest engagement.
Persefone, on the other hand, consolidates all functionalities into a single web solution, but specific feature counts or unique functionalities are not publicly detailed. It likely includes core hotel management features but lacks the extensive optional modules and customization that Mews provides.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a support rating of 4.27/5 from 758 recent reviews, with users often citing quick, helpful responses and effective onboarding, though some report occasional bugs that are resolved swiftly. Its large global team offers 24/7 support, aiding in onboarding and ongoing troubleshooting.
Persefone emphasizes serious technical support, stemming from its 17-year history, but it has no recent review data to gauge current support quality. Its support is reputed to be reliable, especially within Italy, but recent user feedback is unavailable for comparison.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's ecosystem surpasses 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment providers, CRMs, and more, with a vibrant marketplace enabling rapid integration of third-party tools. This vast network allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack with ease.
Persefone offers a fully integrated solution but has no publicly available data on third-party integrations or a marketplace. Its ecosystem is likely more closed, emphasizing stability over flexibility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.62/5 by 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness, automation, and excellent support, especially among boutique and city hotels. The high review count and recency indicate a vibrant, satisfied user base.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings published publicly, limiting the ability to gauge user satisfaction today. Its longstanding reputation suggests reliability, but it lacks current data to compare.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, reflecting its enterprise-level automation and extensive features, with no free tier or trial. Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200 per month, offering a more affordable but less detailed view of its pricing structure, which may include custom quotes for larger hotels.
While Mews’s higher price is justified by its advanced capabilities, Persefone’s lower cost could appeal to smaller or budget-conscious properties. Do your operational needs justify the investment in Mews’s wider capabilities?
Not ideal if your hotel primarily operates in Italy and prefers a traditional, locally supported system with deep regional customization.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid innovation, cloud-native features, or extensive third-party ecosystems.
Mews is a modern, cloud-native PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, supported by a large, active user base that reviews and updates regularly. Its extensive features and marketplace make it a flexible choice for hotels aiming to innovate and scale quickly.
Persefone offers a mature, comprehensive system rooted in Italy, with a focus on stability and all-in-one management, but lacks recent public reviews or a visible ecosystem of integrations. It’s better suited for hotels seeking a regional, stable platform rather than cutting-edge technology.
Choose Mews if your hotel values agility, automation, and a broad ecosystem, especially if you're planning to grow or modernize rapidly. Opt for Persefone if you prefer a long-established, regional solution with a focus on stability and deep feature integration, particularly within the Italian market.
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen Mews PMS en Persefone 10 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aangepaste tarieven | ||
| Gast-CRM | ||
| Gastprofielen | ||
| Meerdere valuta | ||
| Meertalig | ||
| Module voor inkomstenbeheer |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 37 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
We hebben 8 geverifieerde casestudies geanalyseerd om te vergelijken wat hotels daadwerkelijk bereiken met elk platform op vier belangrijke bedrijfsdoelstellingen.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nog geen gepubliceerde casestudy voor dit doel.
Wat hoteliers waarderen
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Waar hoteliers kritiek op hebben
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flex... Hoewel Mews degelijke rapportage- en analysefunctionaliteiten biedt, geven verschillende gebruikers aan dat er behoefte is aan meer aanpasbare en flexibele rapportagemogelijkheden. Gebruikers geven aan dat ze graag gedetailleerdere data-inzichten willen, met name op het gebied van reserveringen en omzetanalyse.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. Mews PMS en Persefone delen veel kern-Property Management Systems-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. Mews PMS biedt 335 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl Persefone er 0 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. Mews PMS scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
Mews PMS: Nee. Persefone: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Property Management Systems-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. Mews heeft een HT Score van 100 en Persefone heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen