Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine vs. Roiback | Booking Engine: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 140 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 140 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Automated reporting.

ROIBACK 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Room substitutions and Facebook conversion tracking.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 与 Roiback | Booking Engine 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 140 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
72
72
推荐可能性
87%
90%
易用性
4.3/5
4.5/5
客户支持
4.1/5
4.7/5
性价比
4.1/5
4.5/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $500/mo
经验证的评价 95 45

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 与 Roiback | Booking Engine 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 140 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 增加收入, 客户服务,而 ROIBACK 用户则强调 支持和客户服务, 直接预订优化, 技术改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Amadeus Amadeus ROIBACK ROIBACK
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 支持和客户服务
+ 增加收入
+ 直接预订优化
+ 客户服务
+ 技术改进
+ 高级报告和分析
+ 报告和分析
缺点
集成能力
多语言和用户友好界面
复杂性和可用性问题
支付网关
功能实现滞后

Amadeus 对比 ROIBACK:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus ROIBACK ROIBACK
小型(10-24 间客房) #22 11 条评价 #29 8 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #15 36 条评价 #22 18 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #7 26 条评价 #14 9 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #9 6 条评价 #10 6 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus ROIBACK ROIBACK
精品酒店 #17 32 条评价 #24 15 条评价
豪华酒店 #12 41 条评价 #23 15 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #10 34 条评价 #18 13 条评价
长住酒店 #14 11 条评价 #19 4 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus ROIBACK ROIBACK
北美 #7 39 条评价 #18 4 条评价
欧洲 #19 14 条评价 #20 12 条评价
亚太 #16 10 条评价 #10 14 条评价
中东 #7 8 条评价 #14 3 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Amadeus' iHotelier® Booking Engine and Roiback’s Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s strategic priorities. Both platforms aim to boost direct bookings, but they approach this goal differently: Amadeus emphasizes robust integration and advanced pricing tools, while Roiback focuses on user experience and flexible features. Your decision should consider your hotel’s size, tech ecosystem, and specific needs for features and support.

Amadeus’s platform boasts more reviews, more recent feedback, and a slightly higher overall rating, making it the more validated choice for most hoteliers. Given the recent reviews and higher review count, the data favor Amadeus as the more reliable option. But which platform aligns best with your hotel’s operational focus?

Is Amadeus or Roiback Better for Hotels?

Both Amadeus and Roiback target hotels that want to increase direct bookings and improve revenue. Amadeus’s platform is built for properties seeking deep integration with existing systems, extensive reporting, and a broad regional presence. Its suite of features supports complex pricing and promotional strategies, making it ideal for hotels with sophisticated revenue management needs.

Roiback, however, appeals more to hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick deployment, and personalized support. It caters to a wide range of property types, from boutique to large hotel groups, especially those looking for a straightforward solution with flexible customization options. Does your hotel need a system focused on advanced integrations or one that emphasizes guest experience?

Roiback vs Amadeus: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a globally integrated solution with sophisticated reporting, revenue management tools, and extensive partner networks, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its platform is favored by hotels aiming to optimize their pricing strategies and leverage market intelligence, making it suitable for mid-to-large properties with complex operational requirements.

Conversely, if your hotel values ease of use, quick setup, and strong customer support, Roiback is better suited. Its flexible features like multi-language support, detailed analytics, and personalized consulting appeal to hotels that want to ramp up direct sales without the complexity of a highly technical system. Which features matter most to you: advanced integrations or guest-centered simplicity?

Is Amadeus or Roiback Easier to Use?

Amadeus’s platform scores 4.25/5 for ease of use, with reviews noting that while it’s feature-rich, some users find it complicated initially. It offers a comprehensive onboarding process, but due to its depth, staff may require significant training to maximize its potential.

Roiback’s interface is rated higher at 4.49/5, praised for its intuitiveness and straightforward setup. Hotels report faster onboarding and easier daily management, especially for teams without extensive technical resources. Edge: Roiback.

Which Has Better Features: Amadeus or Roiback?

Amadeus offers 7 unique features not found in Roiback, including automated reporting, ADA compliance, and advanced testing tools, enhancing revenue strategies and operational insights. Its 29 shared features cover core booking engine functionalities with added depth in promotional and rate management.

Roiback’s unique features, such as social media integration, gift vouchers, and Facebook conversion tracking, emphasize marketing and guest engagement. Its 7 exclusive features support direct sales and campaign flexibility. Overall, Amadeus’s feature set is more robust for revenue-focused hotels. Edge: Amadeus.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Amadeus or Roiback?

Roiback’s customer support earns a high rating of 4.72/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and personalized consulting. Customers highlight that their support team is proactive and instrumental in optimizing hotel sales strategies.

Amadeus’s support scores lower at 3.22/5, with some reviews citing slow responses and inconsistent assistance. While Amadeus offers extensive training, the quality and timeliness vary, impacting user experience. Edge: Roiback.

Which Has More Integrations: Amadeus or Roiback?

Amadeus integrates with 104 verified partners, including major Channel Managers, PMS, and technology systems, providing broad connectivity for large or multi-system hotels. The platform’s extensive partner network supports complex, multi-channel distribution strategies.

Roiback connects with 27 partners, including main Channel Managers and PMS systems, emphasizing seamless connectivity for smaller to mid-sized hotels. Its integrations are reliable but less extensive than Amadeus’s. Edge: Amadeus.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Amadeus or Roiback?

Amadeus has a higher overall rating of 4.39/5, with recent reviews reflecting ongoing satisfaction from independent and boutique hotels. Hotels in Europe and North America, particularly those seeking advanced revenue tools, tend to rate Amadeus more favorably.

Roiback is rated slightly lower overall, but with higher customer satisfaction in recent feedback, especially from hotels valuing support and ease of use. Its ratings are stronger among boutique and mid-sized properties. Which segment do you belong to?

How Much Do Amadeus and Roiback Cost?

Amadeus does not publicly list its pricing; it typically offers customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. Expect higher costs associated with its enterprise-level features, integrations, and support.

Roiback’s starting price is $500 per month with no visible trial or freemium options. Its transparent pricing is an advantage for hotels with limited budgets or those seeking predictable costs. Do you prefer customized enterprise pricing or fixed monthly fees?

What Type of Hotel Should Use Amadeus?

  • Hotels that require deep integration with existing PMS, CRS, or revenue management systems.
  • Properties with complex pricing and promotional needs, like multi-rate or package structures.
  • Large hotels or hotel groups operating across multiple regions.
  • Hotels that prioritize market intelligence and analytics to inform strategic decisions.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, has limited tech support, or needs a quick, simple setup.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Roiback?

  • Hotels that want an easy-to-deploy, straightforward booking engine.
  • Properties seeking strong support and training to maximize online sales.
  • Hotels with international guests needing multi-language and multi-currency features.
  • Hotels that prefer transparent, predictable pricing without custom quotes.

Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations or highly customized revenue management tools.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

In summary, Amadeus offers a more comprehensive, extensively integrated platform suited for larger, complex hotels and groups aiming for detailed revenue and market insights. Its numerous features and extensive partner network make it ideal for strategic, data-driven operators.

Roiback excels in ease of use, support, and flexible features, making it better for hotels prioritizing quick deployment, guest experience, and straightforward management. If your hotel values simplicity and personalized service, Roiback is the better choice.

For most hotels, especially those with higher demands for integration and analytics, Amadeus’s higher review count and recent positive feedback position it as the more reliable, scalable option. Conversely, if your hotel seeks a user-friendly, support-driven platform without extensive customization needs, Roiback delivers strong value at a predictable price point.

In conclusion, your choice depends on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and strategic priorities. Both platforms can deliver results, but Amadeus’s proven track record and recent reviews make it the recommended pick for most hotels evaluating these two solutions.

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 的价格是多少?

预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Amadeus Amadeus ROIBACK ROIBACK
Starting Price From $500/mo

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 有哪些 Roiback | Booking Engine 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享 29 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Amadeus Amadeus ROIBACK ROIBACK
Facebook 转化跟踪
PayU
人工智能优化
可定制的退出意图模式
固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率
婚礼和企业预订模块
房间替换
礼品卡
社交媒体整合/预订
符合 ADA 标准
膳食计划
自动报告

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Amadeus 对比 ROIBACK(按业务目标)

我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Amadeus Amadeus

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

ROIBACK Jasmine City Group 小型
+ With the new strategy, the results were not long in coming. In addition, We supported them in the launch of the new Rewards Program
+ �Jasmine Joy
+ � with exclusive benefits for members.

"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."

Wichuda Nuyongpak
Wichuda Nuyongpak
Group Director of Sales and Marketing

Amadeus 对比 ROIBACK:总结

Amadeus
Amadeus
4.4/5 来自 95 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 91% 正面

TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。

增加收入 85% 正面

许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。

客户服务 76% 正面

人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

集成能力 50% 负面

TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。

复杂性和可用性问题 93% 负面

尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #7 vs #14
中型(25-74 间客房) #15 vs #22
小型(10-24 间客房) #22 vs #29
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #23 vs #32

独特功能

自动报告 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 符合 ADA 标准 人工智能优化 PayU
4.3/5 易用性 3.2/5 客户支持 104 个集成
查看资料
ROIBACK
ROIBACK
4.5/5 来自 45 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

支持和客户服务 91% 正面

Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。

直接预订优化 91% 正面

Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。

技术改进 63% 正面

关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

多语言和用户友好界面 45% 负面

该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。

支付网关 100% 负面

虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。

排名更高的方面

AE #3 vs #7
ES #10 vs #17
MY #11 vs #13
PT #5 vs #7

独特功能

房间替换 Facebook 转化跟踪 可定制的退出意图模式 膳食计划 社交媒体整合/预订
4.5/5 易用性 4.7/5 客户支持 27 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Amadeus 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
客户支持 ROIBACK 4.7 vs 3.2 (+1.5)
性价比 ROIBACK 4.5 vs 4.0 (+0.5)
入职培训 ROIBACK 4.3 vs 4.0 (+0.3)

关于 Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 与 Roiback | Booking Engine 的常见问题

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 能否替代 Roiback | Booking Engine?

这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 或 Roiback | Booking Engine 是否提供免费方案?

Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息