The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #6 179 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #16 47 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #26 2 条评价 | #13 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #26 0 条评价 | #9 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #50 1 条评价 | #12 96 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #42 2 条评价 | #15 45 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #34 3 条评价 | #16 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #51 0 条评价 | #13 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #37 1 条评价 | #3 275 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #34 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #41 0 条评价 | #39 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #34 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, revenue, and guest experience. Both Amadeus Property Management and innRoad aim to streamline operations and boost profitability. However, their core strengths, customer feedback, and feature sets diverge sharply, making your decision easier if you understand these differences.
Amadeus offers a comprehensive solution with a long-standing reputation, but its limited recent reviews and lower usability scores raise questions. InnRoad, with over 238 recent reviews and a 4.7/5 overall rating, clearly leads in user satisfaction and ongoing support.
Amadeus Property Management is a traditional, enterprise-level PMS with a focus on distribution and multi-language support. Its core strength lies in distribution channels, making it suitable for midchain to larger hotels seeking advanced integrations.
innRoad, on the other hand, excels in ease of use, customer support, and operational features. Its cloud-based design and extensive feature set cater well to small-to-mid-sized hotels aiming for quick implementation and revenue growth.
Where do they diverge? Amadeus is more about distribution and multi-lingual capabilities; innRoad emphasizes user-friendly reservation management, OTA integration, and operational automation.
Do these differences align with your hotel's current priorities? This question will determine which system suits your needs best.
If your hotel needs an intuitive, easy-to-implement system with high customer satisfaction, innRoad is the clear choice. It’s especially suited for small to mid-sized hotels, boutique properties, and those prioritizing direct bookings and operational efficiency.
If your hotel requires a robust distribution network, multi-lingual support, and advanced revenue management capabilities, Amadeus could be appropriate. It’s more suitable for larger, international hotels with complex distribution needs and the resources to manage a more sophisticated system.
For most hoteliers, innRoad’s recent reviews and high ratings make it the stronger option. Amadeus’s limited recent feedback and lower ratings suggest it’s less aligned with current market expectations.
innRoad’s ease of use is its standout feature, with a 4.49/5 rating based on recent reviews, and many users citing its intuitive Tape Chart and straightforward reservation management. Implementation is quick, and staff adoption is generally smooth, with a 4.28/5 onboarding score.
Amadeus scores a 3.5/5 on ease of use, with reviews highlighting a steeper learning curve and ongoing challenges in adoption. Its interface is less modern, and some users mention difficulties in navigating the system efficiently.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers a broader feature set with 40 unique functionalities, including a channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, guest messaging, online check-in, and integrated payment terminals. These features support operational automation and direct booking growth.
Amadeus has only 2 features exclusive to its platform: on-premise deployment and multi-lingual support. Its core features focus more on property management and distribution, lacking the extensive operational tools innRoad provides.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad outperforms with a 4.54/5 support rating, and many recent reviews praise their 24/7 live support, prompt responses, and dedicated onboarding. Hoteliers regularly mention that innRoad’s support team is highly reliable and knowledgeable.
Amadeus’s customer support scores 3.63/5, with reviews citing inconsistent service, slow callbacks, and unresolved issues over multiple years. Users note that support can be hit-or-miss, especially outside certain regions.
Edge: innRoad.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including leading OTAs, PMS integrations, and distribution channels, making it highly adaptable for complex hotel portfolios. Its integrations include Revinate, Oracle Hospitality, and TripAdvisor.
innRoad has 34 verified partners, including major OTAs and credit card processors. Its integrations are robust for small-to-mid-sized hotels, but it lacks some specialized distribution channels present in Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus.
innRoad’s recent reviews, with 238 in the past six months, reflect a 4.7/5 overall rating and an 8.82/10 NPS score—indicating high satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially independent and boutique properties, praise its ease of use and support.
Amadeus, with only 4 reviews and a 2.5/5 overall score, struggles to match this level of satisfaction. Its older reviews mention ongoing issues, and the few recent comments are less glowing.
Edge: innRoad.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. It typically targets larger properties with budget for comprehensive solutions.
innRoad charges $300/month without hidden fees, offering a straightforward subscription model. Pricing is transparent and designed for small to mid-sized hotels seeking affordable, scalable solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a quick setup, user-friendly interface, or operates primarily in one language.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced distribution features, extensive multi-language support, or complex revenue management.
The core difference lies in their target audience: innRoad focuses on user-friendliness, support, and operational features for smaller hotels, while Amadeus caters to larger, distribution-heavy hotels seeking extensive international reach.
Choose innRoad if you prioritize an easy-to-implement system with high customer satisfaction, proven revenue growth, and strong support. It’s especially suited for boutique properties, independents, and hotels looking for practical, operational tools.
Opt for Amadeus if your hotel operates across multiple countries with complex distribution needs, requires multi-lingual support, and can invest in a more sophisticated, distribution-centric platform. Its lower recent review count and satisfaction ratings make it less appealing for most hotels today.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers, innRoad’s recent reviews, high ratings, and comprehensive feature set position it as the superior choice. Amadeus may still serve larger, international hotel chains but has less current validation from the user community.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 innRoad 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus Property Management:否。innRoad:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 31。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问