Amadeus Property Management vs. RoomRaccoon PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 213 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 213 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Amadeus 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.

RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest profiles.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Amadeus Property Management 与 RoomRaccoon PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 213 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
80
推荐可能性
78%
94%
易用性
3.5/5
4.8/5
客户支持
3.6/5
4.5/5
性价比
3.0/5
4.5/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $1,000/mo
经验证的评价 4 209

Amadeus Property Management 与 RoomRaccoon PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 213 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Amadeus Amadeus RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
优点
+ 用户界面和体验
+ 一体化系统
+ 自动发送电子邮件和文档
缺点
服务和支持
集成限制
系统错误和稳定性问题

Amadeus 对比 RoomRaccoon:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
小型(10-24 间客房) #56 1 条评价 #10 90 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #47 1 条评价 #17 27 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #26 2 条评价 #14 7 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #26 0 条评价 #19 0 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
精品酒店 #50 1 条评价 #9 100 条评价
豪华酒店 #42 2 条评价 #9 64 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #34 3 条评价 #14 29 条评价
长住酒店 #51 0 条评价 #7 28 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Amadeus Amadeus RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
北美 #37 1 条评价 #24 7 条评价
欧洲 #38 2 条评价 #5 123 条评价
亚太 #41 0 条评价 #31 4 条评价
中东 #31 1 条评价

The Decision

When choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel, the core decision often boils down to balancing features, ease of use, support, and cost. Both Amadeus Property Management by Amadeus and RoomRaccoon PMS aim to streamline hotel operations but do so with different strengths. Amadeus, a longstanding player with extensive distribution capabilities, offers a broad set of features for larger or more complex properties. RoomRaccoon, a newer and highly reviewed platform, excels in user-friendliness and integration for small to mid-sized independent hotels. Which system better aligns with your hotel’s needs?

Amadeus’s reputation is built on its extensive distribution network and reliability for larger chains, whereas RoomRaccoon’s recent surge in reviews and user satisfaction shows its strong appeal for smaller hotels seeking automation and simplicity. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions. Are you prioritizing broad distribution and extensive features or ease of management and quick deployment?

Is Amadeus or RoomRaccoon Better for Hotels?

Amadeus Property Management has a long history in the hospitality industry, primarily serving mid-sized to large hotels with complex needs, offering detailed distribution integrations and on-premise options. Its review count is only 4, with a review in the last six months indicating some ongoing user concerns, especially around support and stability, with a 2.5/5 overall rating. Conversely, RoomRaccoon boasts 169 reviews, with 5 recent reviews that highlight its modern, all-in-one approach and high user satisfaction, reflected in a 4.88/5 rating.

While Amadeus provides advanced distribution channels and on-premise deployment, many users report issues with support responsiveness and software bugs, impacting daily operations for some. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, is praised for its intuitive interface, automation features, and robust integrations, making it ideal for independent hotels and small chains. Do you need a system that scales to enterprise levels or one that simplifies daily management?

RoomRaccoon vs Amadeus: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-learn platform with excellent automation, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its user friendliness, high support ratings, and recent positive reviews make it ideal for boutique hotels, bed & breakfasts, and small independents looking to increase direct bookings and revenue.

If your hotel requires extensive distribution, on-premise options, or advanced multi-property management, Amadeus might be more suitable. Its capabilities are better suited for larger chains or properties with complex distribution needs, although its limited recent reviews and lower support ratings suggest potential operational challenges.

For small to mid-sized hotels seeking quick deployment, automation, and high user satisfaction, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Larger, complex properties aiming for enterprise distribution and customization may find Amadeus more aligned with their requirements, but should consider the support concerns.

Is Amadeus or RoomRaccoon Easier to Use?

RoomRaccoon scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.74/5 rating, an intuitive interface, and many reviews praising its simplicity. Users consistently mention how easy it is to manage bookings, check-ins, and invoicing with minimal training, citing the system’s modern design. Onboarding is also rated at 4.61/5, with many users highlighting quick setup and straightforward navigation.

Amadeus, however, has a lower ease of use score of 3.5/5, and reviews point out a steeper learning curve coupled with occasional system bugs. Some users find the interface less modern and more complex, which can hinder staff adoption, especially in smaller hotels without dedicated IT support.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Features: Amadeus or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon offers a significantly broader feature set with 35 unique features, including a built-in booking engine, mobile app, guest profiles, integrated CRS, ancillary revenue tracking, EPoS, and real-time reporting. Features like online check-in, ID scanning, lobby kiosk, and automated space optimization are designed for operational efficiency and guest experience.

Amadeus provides only 2 features exclusive to its platform—on-premise deployment and online 24/7 support—indicating a narrower set of functionalities. While it excels in distribution and property management, it lacks many of the automation and guest-centric tools that RoomRaccoon offers.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Amadeus or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon’s support process is rated at 4.53/5, with reviews highlighting responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive assistance. Many users share stories of quick resolutions and personalized support, helping them adapt the system swiftly. Conversely, Amadeus support scores 3.63/5, with some reviews citing slow responses and unresolved issues, particularly in the Netherlands.

While Amadeus’s support may be adequate for larger, enterprise clients with dedicated account managers, RoomRaccoon’s more recent reviews paint a picture of a responsive team that actively supports small hotel operators through onboarding and daily use.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has More Integrations: Amadeus or RoomRaccoon?

Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including high-profile integrations like Cendyn, HotelTime, and site management solutions, catering to hotels needing extensive distribution and data connectivity. RoomRaccoon has 88 verified partners, including key integrations like SiteMinder, HotelRunner, and payment systems, with 20 shared partners.

Both platforms support a robust marketplace, but Amadeus’s larger partner network indicates a stronger presence in traditional distribution channels. However, RoomRaccoon excels with flexible, real-time integrations suited for small hotels that prioritize dynamic connectivity.

Edge: Amadeus.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Amadeus or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.88/5 and recent reviews show high satisfaction among independent, boutique, and small hotels, many praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels like Vila Origens and Buff and Fellow report significant revenue boosts and operational savings, confirming its effectiveness.

Amadeus, with only 4 reviews and a 2.5/5 rating, shows a pattern of dissatisfaction, especially related to support and stability issues. Larger hotel chains may appreciate its distribution power, but the recent review data favor RoomRaccoon’s user happiness.

Edge: RoomRaccoon.

How Much Do Amadeus and RoomRaccoon Cost?

Amadeus does not publicly list pricing, which often indicates a custom quote based on property size and needs. It typically involves implementation fees and ongoing costs, suitable for larger hotels with bigger budgets.

RoomRaccoon charges a flat monthly fee of $1,000 without an implementation fee or trial, making it transparent and predictable. This price is geared toward small to medium-sized hotels seeking a comprehensive, budget-friendly platform.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Amadeus?

  • Hotels that need extensive distribution and global connectivity.
  • Properties with complex multi-channel sales strategies.
  • Larger independent or chain hotels with dedicated tech teams.
  • Hotels that require on-premise deployment for security or compliance.
  • Hotels looking to scale and expand their market reach.

Not ideal if: You’re a small hotel wanting quick setup, intuitive management, or affordability.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

  • Small hotels, boutique properties, and bed & breakfasts seeking simplicity.
  • Hotels wanting an all-in-one platform with automation features.
  • Independent operators focusing on increasing direct bookings.
  • Hotels that prioritize user-friendly design and fast onboarding.
  • Hotels looking for flexible integrations with third-party tools.

Not ideal if: You operate a large, complex hotel chain with highly customized distribution needs.

RoomRaccoon vs Amadeus: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference lies in target audience and feature scope. Amadeus offers a broad set of distribution and management tools tailored for larger, multi-property hotels and chains. RoomRaccoon excels in ease of use, automation, and integration—perfect for small to mid-sized independent hotels.

Choose Amadeus if your hotel needs advanced distribution, on-premise options, and extensive multi-property management. Opt for RoomRaccoon if your priority is an intuitive, budget-friendly platform that automates daily tasks and boosts direct bookings.

For most small and independent hotels, RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews and high user satisfaction make it the safer, more efficient choice. Larger hotels with complex distribution needs may still consider Amadeus but should weigh potential support and stability issues carefully.

Amadeus Property Management 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Amadeus Amadeus RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
Starting Price From $1,000/mo

Amadeus Property Management 有哪些 RoomRaccoon PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus Property Management 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Amadeus Amadeus RoomRaccoon RoomRaccoon
在前提
在线 24/7 支持
客人资料
礼品卡
移动应用
综合 CRS
辅助收入跟踪
预订引擎

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 25 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Amadeus 对比 RoomRaccoon(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Amadeus Amadeus

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RoomRaccoon Buff and Fellow 小型
+ 60% increase in RevPAR in a year by implementing RoomRaccoon
+ �s dynamic pricing tools.
+ 781% ROI on RaccoonUpsell subscription - RoomRaccoon

"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."

Frikkie du Toit
Frikkie du Toit
Hotel Owner
提高运营效率
Amadeus Amadeus

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RoomRaccoon O'Two Boutique Hotel 小型
+ 307% ROI on Annual RaccoonUpsell subscription just from ancillary revenue
+ 46% direct bookings
+ Reduced human error by automating payments

"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."

Jayson van Noordwyk
Jayson van Noordwyk
General Manager
改善宾客体验
Amadeus Amadeus

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RoomRaccoon Steenhof Suites 小型
+ 1836% ROI on RaccoonUpsell
+ 50% of guests check-in online
+ 127% increase in RevPAR

"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."

Amadeus 对比 RoomRaccoon:总结

Amadeus
Amadeus
3.9/5 来自 4 条评价

独特功能

在线 24/7 支持 在前提
3.5/5 易用性 3.6/5 客户支持 104 个集成
查看资料
RoomRaccoon
RoomRaccoon
4.7/5 来自 209 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和体验 79% 正面

许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。

一体化系统 100% 正面

RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。

自动发送电子邮件和文档 84% 正面

酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

服务和支持 65% 负面

虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。

集成限制 74% 负面

一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #14 vs #26
中型(25-74 间客房) #17 vs #47
小型(10-24 间客房) #10 vs #56
超大型(200+ 间客房) #19 vs #26

独特功能

预订引擎 移动应用 礼品卡 客人资料 综合 CRS
4.7/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 88 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 RoomRaccoon 4.9 vs 2.5 (+2.4)
易用性 RoomRaccoon 4.7 vs 3.5 (+1.2)
客户支持 RoomRaccoon 4.5 vs 3.6 (+0.9)
性价比 RoomRaccoon 4.5 vs 3.0 (+1.5)
入职培训 RoomRaccoon 4.6 vs 3.8 (+0.9)

关于 Amadeus Property Management 与 RoomRaccoon PMS 的常见问题

Amadeus Property Management 能否替代 RoomRaccoon PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Amadeus Property Management 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus Property Management 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Amadeus Property Management 或 RoomRaccoon PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Amadeus Property Management:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Amadeus Property Management 和 RoomRaccoon PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息