The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 355 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 Elina PMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户反馈和开发, 易于使用和培训。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
用户反馈和开发
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
易于使用和培训
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
与其他系统集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
灵活性和系统复杂性
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #37 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #37 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #51 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #31 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #57 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #18 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #48 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #21 22 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #24 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | #22 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and Elina PMS by Elina PMS hinges on your hotel's specific operational needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in scope, features, and market presence. As a hotelier seeking a reliable, feature-rich platform, your decision should consider recent user feedback, overall ratings, and the unique strengths each product offers.
Clock PMS currently leads in reviews, recent updates, and global reach, making it a more established choice for hotels prioritizing comprehensive management. But does the deeper feature set of Clock truly match your hotel’s needs better than Elina’s more niche, cost-effective approach?
Both Clock PMS and Elina PMS are designed to centralize hotel operations, from reservations to billing and guest communication. Clock's extensive feature list includes integrated CRS, multi-currency support, guest apps, and automation tools, all aimed at busy-day hotel environments. Conversely, Elina PMS offers core reservation management, online check-in, and strong integrations, but with fewer exclusive features—only 11 features are unique to Clock versus 2 for Elina.
Recent reviews favor Clock, with a higher overall rating (4.8/5 vs 4.17/5) and 251 reviews compared to Elina’s 25. Clock’s recent feedback emphasizes its ease of use, operational efficiency, and ongoing development, while Elina users frequently praise its complexity, flexibility, and support. Do you need a system that handles a broad range of functions out-of-the-box or one that’s tailored and more straightforward?
If your hotel operates at a larger scale, with multiple properties, diverse revenue streams, or complex operations requiring extensive integrations, Clock PMS is the better fit. Its 47 shared features and 11 exclusive ones—including guest CRM, online checkout, and mobile housekeeping—support sophisticated workflows. For boutique hotels or small properties focused on increasing direct bookings and guest personalization, Elina’s strong channel management, revenue tools, and lower complexity might suffice.
Hotels with high growth ambitions, an emphasis on automation, or a need for multi-currency and multi-lingual capabilities should lean toward Clock. If your team values deep integration with accounting, online booking engines, and robust reporting, Clock’s larger ecosystem serves those needs well. Conversely, if your property benefits from strong support, straightforward setup, and competitive pricing, Elina makes a compelling choice.
Clock PMS scores a 4.78/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and simplified staff training. Its modern UI and comprehensive onboarding process make it accessible even for teams new to PMS software. Elina, rated 4.3/5, is praised for its user-friendly features, but some users mention that its interface can feel cluttered, and setup may require more support.
Clock’s dedicated mobile app, guest messaging, and automation contribute to faster operational workflows, even during busy periods. Elina’s support and training are strong points, but its complexity sometimes leads to longer learning curves. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s system boasts 47 shared features with Elina, plus 11 unique capabilities like integrated CRS, multilingual support, guest apps, automated assignments, and shift planning. These features cater to high-volume, multi-property hotels looking for automation and extensive customization. Elina offers vital features like reservations, payments, and reporting, but with only 2 features exclusive to its platform, focusing more on core management.
Clock’s dedicated guest portal, online checkout, and housekeeper mobile app stand out, addressing operational gaps many hotels face. Elina’s strengths lie in its revenue management, deep integrations, and flexible configurations, but it lacks some of Clock’s advanced automation. Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS’s 4.75/5 support rating reflects a highly responsive, proactive support team, with recent reviews praising their quick response times and clarity. Hoteliers note that Clock's support feels personal and attentive, which is critical during urgent operational issues. Elina PMS also scores highly at 4.7/5, with users appreciating the support team’s responsiveness and helpfulness, especially given the platform’s complexity.
While both are highly rated, Clock’s larger user base and recent reviews suggest a more consistent, global support presence. Some users mention that Clock’s support team offers ongoing updates, which further solidifies trust. Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Stripe, and RoomChecking, with 12 shared integrations with Elina. This extensive partner network enables broader connectivity for reservations, payments, and channel management, supporting hotel ecosystems of all sizes. Elina offers 20 verified partners, focusing on revenue management, analytics, and OTA integrations, but with fewer options overall.
Clock’s diverse integrations—especially its exclusive partners like Flexipass and Lybra Tech—support more complex tech stacks. Elina’s integrations are strong but more limited, focusing on core revenue and channel management. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s stellar ratings—4.8/5 overall and a 9.47/10 NPS—are based on over ten times the reviews of Elina. Recent feedback emphasizes Clock’s ease of use, comprehensive features, and exceptional support, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Elina’s 4.17/5 rating, while solid, is primarily based on fewer reviews, many of which praise its support but highlight system complexity.
Hotels in Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific rate Clock higher, with many reviews noting its role in streamlining operations and boosting revenue. Elina’s reviews often come from smaller portfolios, with praise for support and integration but concerns about usability and reporting. Overall, Clock dominates in user ratings. Edge: Clock.
Clock PMS is priced at $600/month per property, with no hidden fees or implementation charges. Its flat-rate model simplifies budgeting and provides transparency. Elina PMS costs $700/month per property, also without hidden fees, but some users report additional costs for API customization and advanced features.
While Clock’s slightly lower price point and transparent structure appeal, both products lack free trials or tiered plans, so exact value depends on your property’s feature needs. For a comprehensive, all-in-one system, Clock’s price is competitive given its extensive feature set.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Clock PMS provides an all-encompassing, flexible platform with a broader feature set, higher recent ratings, and extensive integrations. Its focus on automation, guest engagement, and multi-property management makes it suitable for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Choose Clock if your hotel values a mature, feature-rich PMS backed by a large support network and global presence. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it the more trusted, comprehensive option for hotels ready to scale.
Elina PMS offers core property management features with strong support and integrations, but with fewer exclusive features and a smaller market footprint. Its value lies in straightforward management and support for hotels prioritizing direct bookings and revenue management without extensive automation.
Select Elina if your hotel needs a cost-effective, reliable system focused on revenue and integration, especially if your operations are less complex or you're a smaller property. Its niche strengths may suit properties with specific preferences for support and customization.
In conclusion, for hotels seeking a proven, feature-rich platform with the latest updates and widespread adoption, Clock PMS is the clear leader. Its comprehensive ecosystem and recent reviews support a compelling case for its suitability in dynamic, growth-oriented hotel operations.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都称赞 Elina 的支持团队反应迅速、知识渊博、乐于助人。用户很欣赏他们能够快速获得帮助,并且支持团队竭尽全力满足他们的需求。不过,也有人提到,电... 许多评论都称赞 Elina 的支持团队反应迅速、知识渊博、乐于助人。用户很欣赏他们能够快速获得帮助,并且支持团队竭尽全力满足他们的需求。不过,也有人提到,电话支持可以更加一致。
Elina PMS 不断发展,许多用户都对该公司响应反馈、根据用户建议实施新功能和改进的能力表示赞赏。然而,人们希望更频繁地进行更新和改进,特别是在客户沟通工具... Elina PMS 不断发展,许多用户都对该公司响应反馈、根据用户建议实施新功能和改进的能力表示赞赏。然而,人们希望更频繁地进行更新和改进,特别是在客户沟通工具方面。
Elina PMS 的易用性经常被提及,新员工培训简单,日常操作顺利进行。然而,用户希望更频繁地进行深入培训课程,并认为系统可以更直观。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户强调了 Elina PMS 在处理各种物业管理需求方面的灵活性。这种灵活性往往伴随着一些代价,因为一些用户发现该系统导航和设置起来很复杂,通常需要支持团... 一些用户强调了 Elina PMS 在处理各种物业管理需求方面的灵活性。这种灵活性往往伴随着一些代价,因为一些用户发现该系统导航和设置起来很复杂,通常需要支持团队的帮助才能充分利用这些功能。
Elina PMS 以其强大的收入管理工具而闻名,包括动态定价和基于入住率的配置。用户报告称,这些功能提高了公司营业额并延长了预订季节。但是,一些用户在设置这些... Elina PMS 以其强大的收入管理工具而闻名,包括动态定价和基于入住率的配置。用户报告称,这些功能提高了公司营业额并延长了预订季节。但是,一些用户在设置这些配置时遇到了复杂性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Elina PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Elina PMS 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Elina PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Elina PMS 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问