The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 376 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and intuitive design, 预订和客房管理, 集成与自动化,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Design
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
预订和客房管理
▾
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
+
培训和入职
▾
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能更新和可用性
▾
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
−
连接性和同步性
▾
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Clock PMS and Infor HMS centers on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline management tasks, but their approach, features, and user experience differ significantly. Clock PMS offers a modern, all-in-one cloud platform with a focus on automation and guest engagement, while Infor HMS provides a comprehensive, scalable system with deep customization options. Which one best fits your hotel’s unique requirements?
Clock PMS and Infor HMS are both property management systems designed to improve efficiency and guest satisfaction. Clock PMS’s strength lies in its extensive feature set tailored for busy-day realities, with a user-friendly cloud interface supported by 251 recent reviews emphasizing ease of use and modern automation. In contrast, Infor HMS, with fewer recent reviews (only 46, none in the last six months), is a more traditional, customizable platform praised for its integration capabilities but criticized for its interface and update issues. Given the recency and volume of Clock PMS reviews, it provides a more current and reliable picture of user satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, easy-to-adopt platform capable of handling complex operations across multiple channels, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its robust suite of 39 exclusive features (like booking engine, EPoS, integrated CRS, and native guest app) supports high-volume, dynamic environments, especially boutique and city center hotels. Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes deep customization, integration with legacy systems, and on-premise deployment, Infor HMS’s flexible architecture and extensive partner network may suit you better. Your decision hinges on whether you prefer a modern, all-in-one SaaS solution or a customizable, scalable system.
Clock PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users mention that training new staff is simple and quick, with the platform’s design reducing operational confusion. In contrast, Infor HMS scores 3.88/5, with some users citing a less intuitive interface and a steeper learning curve, especially during updates. Support responsiveness is stronger with Clock, which further facilitates smoother adoption. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 39 features exclusive to its platform, including a booking engine, EPoS, digital registration, guest messaging, online check-in/out, guest app, automated reminders, and real-time reporting. It integrates these capabilities into one system without additional costs on integrations. Infor HMS provides a core set of features, with only one exclusive feature—on-premise deployment—and relies heavily on integrations for extended functionality. While Infor’s core modules are solid, Clock’s broader feature set, especially for guest engagement and automation, gives it a distinct edge. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS has a customer support score of 4.75/5, with recent reviews praising its quick, helpful responses and proactive service. Many users note that support is a key reason for their continued satisfaction. Infor HMS scores 4.04/5, with some reviews mentioning support as generally responsive but occasionally inconsistent, especially during software updates. While Infor’s support is competent, Clock’s more recent, highly-rated service offers a clearer advantage. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified partners, including major players like Profitroom, Fairmas, and Booking.com, with 41 shared partnerships with Infor. It offers no connection fees on integrations, providing flexibility in connecting third-party tools. Infor HMS, with 113 partners, also covers key integrations but is noted for its focus on enterprise-level, on-premise solutions. The compatibility and ease of integration appear comparable, but Clock’s slightly broader network and no extra charges give it an advantage for hotels seeking diverse, flexible integrations. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS’s recent reviews (6 in the last 6 months) reflect a high overall rating of 4.8/5, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique, city center, and independent hotels. Its high NPS score (9.47/10) signifies strong customer loyalty. Infor HMS, with only 46 reviews and no recent feedback, shows a lower overall rating of 4.04/5 and a recommendation likelihood of 74%. The recent, plentiful reviews for Clock PMS indicate more current, positive hotelier experiences. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is priced at a flat $600 monthly fee, with no trial or implementation costs disclosed. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting straightforward. Infor HMS does not list specific prices publicly, emphasizing a tailored quote based on hotel size and needs, which can mean higher costs and less predictability. For hotels seeking clarity and predictable expenses, Clock PMS offers a clear value proposition.
Clock PMS and Infor HMS are both solid hotel management solutions, but they serve different hotel profiles. Clock PMS’s core strength is its modern, easy-to-use, all-in-one cloud platform that prioritizes automation and guest engagement, supported by a large volume of recent, positive reviews. Infor HMS, while offering deep customization and integration, lags behind in recent user satisfaction and ease of use, especially considering its fewer, older reviews.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick deployment, and a comprehensive feature set, Clock PMS is the better choice. It delivers more current hotelier feedback, higher ratings, and a broader array of features that cater to busy-hotels seeking efficiency. However, if you require an enterprise-level, highly customizable on-premise system with deep integrations, Infor HMS might suit you better despite its older, less recent review data.
In summary, for most hotels today, especially those looking for a modern, cloud-based management platform with proven user satisfaction, Clock PMS emerges as the stronger, more reliable option.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees... Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees and enhances operational efficiency. The software's straightforward navigation and learnability make it ideal for fast-paced environments.
评论者经常提到,Clock PMS+ 提供了高效的预订和客房管理工具。它将预订、客房管理和宾客沟通等各种运营环节整合到一个平台上,从而节省时间并减少错误。
用户非常欣赏 Clock PMS+ 的广泛集成和自动化功能,它可以与其他系统无缝连接,节省重复性任务的时间,并增强日常运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好... 一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好地适应这些更新。
一些用户指出,虽然 Clock PMS+ 提供了全面的报告,但在数据收集和呈现方式方面仍有改进的空间,这可以增强收入管理和战略规划。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 110 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 88,Infor 的为 19。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案