The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #6 179 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #16 47 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #32 2 条评价 | #13 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #31 1 条评价 | #9 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #12 96 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #15 45 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #16 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #13 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #3 275 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #34 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | #39 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and innRoad by innRoad hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline property management, but they serve distinctly different hotel types and offer varying features—Counter focuses on hostels with simplicity, while innRoad targets a broader spectrum of hotels with robust revenue tools. Your choice should align with your current scale and future plans.
Counter appeals mainly to hostel operators who prioritize ease of use and affordability, while innRoad attracts hotels seeking extensive integrations and advanced revenue management. Do you need a straightforward, cost-effective PMS or a comprehensive platform that drives revenue growth?
Counter and innRoad are both designed to manage reservations, check-ins, and operations, but they diverge in complexity and target user base. Counter, with a recent review count of 54 and a 4.73/5 score, emphasizes simplicity, especially for hostel environments, offering features like POS integration and mobile management. InnRoad, with 238 reviews and a slightly lower overall rating of 4.7/5, provides a wider feature set aimed at increasing bookings and revenue, including channel management and revenue tools.
Counter’s recent reviews are all from hostel operators praising its intuitive interface, while innRoad’s latest feedback comes from traditional hotels emphasizing its revenue boosting capabilities. Which platform aligns better with your operational needs and growth goals?
If your hotel is a hostel or budget property seeking a free, easy-to-use system with minimal setup, Counter is the smarter choice. Its focus on hostels and simplicity suits teams that prioritize operational efficiency and guest management over complex features.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich platform capable of multi-channel distribution, revenue management, and scalability, innRoad is the better fit. It caters to a broader hotel segment and supports growth with tools designed to boost direct bookings and streamline operations.
In summary, choose Counter if your priority is straightforward operations with minimal cost and complexity. Opt for innRoad if revenue growth, integrations, and comprehensive control are your goals.
Counter boasts a user rating of 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its simple, intuitive interface that loads seamlessly on mobile browsers. Users frequently mention how easy it is to train staff and manage check-ins remotely, with a review stating, "Counter is very friendly, easy to learn, and no teaching necessary." Support responsiveness is also praised, though some note bugs affecting daily operations.
InnRoad’s usability is rated slightly lower at 4.49/5, with reviews criticizing sporadic glitches and slow performance, especially in group management and on mobile devices. Customers appreciate its comprehensive features but often mention that system bugs can hinder daily tasks, such as rate adjustments and reservations.
Edge: Counter.
innRoad offers a significantly larger feature set, with 38 exclusive features, including channel management, booking engine, revenue management, online check-in, guest messaging, and integrated payment terminals. Its robust suite supports growth, automation, and multi-channel distribution, making it suitable for hotels aiming to scale.
Counter has only one unique feature—multi-lingual support—but excels at core hostel management. While it covers essential operations like POS and automation, it lacks advanced tools like revenue management, digital registration, and extensive integrations.
Edge: innRoad.
Counter’s support is highly praised, with a 4.96/5 rating and reviews emphasizing fast, responsive assistance from team members like Evelyn and Max. Users feel well-supported, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, despite some complaints about slower support in certain time zones.
innRoad’s support rating of 4.54/5 reflects a generally positive experience but includes feedback on delays and inconsistent communication. Clients appreciate its 24/7 availability, yet some mention slow resolution times and system glitches that occasionally impact their experience.
Edge: Counter.
innRoad’s extensive integration network includes 34 verified partners, supporting over 100 OTAs, credit card processors, and other tools like QuickBooks and Revinate. This breadth facilitates seamless distribution, accounting, and guest engagement.
Counter offers 7 verified partners, including popular options like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds, but with a narrower scope. Its integrations focus primarily on payment, channel management, and access control—suitable for small hostels.
Edge: innRoad.
Counter’s recent reviews are limited but overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.75/5 rating from hostel operators praising its simplicity and support. InnRoad’s larger review base (238 reviews) yields a 4.72/5 average, with many traditional hotel users citing revenue increases and operational improvements.
Counter’s reviews from hostel properties are more recent and focused on ease of use, which boosts confidence. innRoad’s broader hotel segment reviews reflect its versatility but also mention occasional glitches.
Edge: Counter.
Counter is a free PMS, making it highly attractive for small hostels and budget properties with limited budgets. It does not charge implementation or monthly fees, simplifying cost considerations.
innRoad charges a flat rate of $300 per month, with no hidden fees or extra charges. Its pricing model reflects its extensive feature set, making it more suitable for hotels with larger operational needs and budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter offers a simple, no-cost solution primarily for hostels and small properties that want quick, easy management. Its recent reviews highlight high satisfaction with usability and support, making it ideal for budget-conscious or small-scale operations.
innRoad provides a feature-rich platform capable of scaling with your property, especially if you aim to boost revenue and expand distribution channels. Its extensive integrations, advanced tools, and larger user base make it the preferred choice for hotels seeking growth and detailed control.
If your hotel’s priority is straightforward management and budget-friendliness, Counter is your best bet. For hotels ready to invest in tools that drive revenue and operational efficiency, innRoad is the clear winner.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 innRoad 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。innRoad:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,innRoad 的为 31。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问