项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 28 条评价 | #24 38 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #48 4 条评价 | #14 62 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #34 2 条评价 | #12 15 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #28 1 条评价 | #37 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #33 16 条评价 | #20 51 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #45 4 条评价 | #20 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #17 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #19 11 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #30 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #10 100 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #17 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
Counter and protel PMS serve distinctly different hotel segments, diverging primarily on property type and operational scale. Counter targets hostels and small budget properties with an emphasis on simplicity and automation, boasting a 4.7/5 rating among hostels from 50 reviews. protel PMS, by contrast, supports a broader hotel spectrum including branded, boutique, and luxury hotels, as well as resorts, with significant multi-property and integration capabilities, but with a lower overall rating of 4/5 across 128 reviews.
Both products solve the core problem of property management by automating front desk workflows, managing reservations, and updating availability centrally. Counter simplifies these for smaller, staff-light environments with mobile access and channel management, while protel PMS offers a comprehensive suite aimed at scalable, complex hotel operations integrating payments, CRM, and revenue management.
If your property is a hostel or small budget hotel—particularly with a need for a mobile-friendly, easy-to-learn system and automated night audits—Counter fits best, supported by 83% of its users being hostels and a 4.7/5 rating in that segment. Counter’s limited feature set and integrations reflect its focus on smaller operations; review volume and ratings strongly support this niche fit.
If your hotel is a boutique, branded, or resort property with complex multi-property needs, extensive reporting, and deep integrations, protel PMS is the clear choice based on its 196 verified integrations and 128 reviews spanning multiple hotel types. protel’s 4.1/5 rating among luxury and branded hotels and case studies showing doubled reservations and upsell revenue reinforce its suitability. Reviewers note its complexity and longer onboarding but also its adaptability and extensive feature set.
For hotels operating across multiple regions or requiring multi-currency and multi-lingual support, protel’s capabilities are unmatched. For hostels or small properties prioritizing ease and rapid deployment, Counter is superior. The data is limited for very small independent hotels outside hostels for protel, so Counter’s strong hostel focus is a safer bet there.
Counter outperforms protel PMS on ease of use and onboarding, with respective ratings of 4.6/5 and 4.7/5 compared to protel’s 4.2/5 and 3.8/5. Reviewers of Counter emphasize its intuitive interface requiring minimal staff training; one notes “no teaching necessary” for front desk staff. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well to reduce workload, especially for smaller teams.
protel PMS users find the interface generally intuitive but complex, especially when configuring advanced features and multi-property operations. Several reviews mention that recent updates have made some functions less straightforward and that training resources could be improved. Long onboarding times and difficulty mastering customization are common themes.
Edge: Counter.
protel PMS has a significant feature advantage with 30 unique hotel-relevant features compared to Counter’s 3. protel offers on-premise deployment, integrated revenue management, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, guest CRM, digital registration, PCI and GDPR compliance, task management, and integrated payment terminals. These features support complex workflows, compliance, and broad operational needs for larger hotels and chains.
Counter’s unique features include a built-in channel manager, automated night audit, and a mobile app, which streamline core hostel operations and enable management on the go. These features reflect its focus on front desk efficiency and automation for smaller properties.
The breadth and depth of protel’s features enable more comprehensive revenue optimization, guest communication, and operational control. Counter’s limited but focused feature set suits smaller teams but lacks advanced capabilities like guest profiles or real-time reporting.
Edge: protel PMS.
Counter rates higher in customer support and onboarding with 4.9/5 and 4.7/5 compared to protel’s 4.0/5 and 3.8/5. Reviewers repeatedly praise Counter’s responsive, helpful support team, often naming staff like Evelyn and Max for quick replies and follow-ups. Even negative reviews commend support staff despite software issues.
protel PMS users report mixed experiences with support. Many mention slow response times, difficulty reaching phone support, and delays in issue resolution post-Planet acquisition. A few reviews describe support as competent but inaccessible, which can disrupt operations during critical moments.
Edge: Counter.
protel PMS leads integration counts with 196 verified partners, vastly outnumbering Counter’s 7. Both share key partners like SiteMinder and FLYR Hospitality, but protel includes integrations with major RMS, CRM, BI tools, and specialized revenue management systems such as Right Revenue and Profitroom. This extensive ecosystem enables hotels to connect protel to a wide array of third-party tools for distribution, guest engagement, and operational insights.
Counter’s integrations focus on core platforms relevant for hostels, such as Cloudbeds and Stripe, supporting payment processing and channel management but lacking the breadth for multi-property or multi-functional workflows.
Hotels with complex technology stacks or multi-property needs benefit from protel’s integration scale. Smaller hostels with simpler systems may find Counter’s integrations sufficient.
Edge: protel PMS.
Counter has a higher overall rating of 4.6/5 from 57 reviews, compared to protel’s 4.0/5 from 128 reviews. Counter’s recent reviews are unavailable, but protel’s last six months rating remains steady at 4.0/5 from 20 reviews, indicating stable current satisfaction.
By segment, Counter scores 4.7/5 in hostels (50 reviews) and 4.6/5 in limited service hotels (35 reviews). protel PMS rates highest among branded hotels (4.3/5, 39 reviews), resorts (4.1/5, 20 reviews), and luxury hotels (4.1/5, 37 reviews). protel’s boutique hotel rating is lower at 3.9/5 across 51 reviews, suggesting mixed satisfaction there.
Counter’s ratings reflect strong satisfaction in its core hostel niche, while protel’s ratings show broader but more varied appeal. The review volume and recency favor protel for enterprise and multi-property users, but Counter dominates the hostel segment.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publish pricing, has no implementation fee, no monthly per room or flat fees, and no trial offer. It is described as a free system tailored for hostels, which aligns with user comments on affordability.
protel PMS publishes a base price of $500, with no per-room monthly fees or implementation fees disclosed. No trial is offered. The $500 base price likely reflects a small property or entry-level license, with additional costs for modules, integrations, and customization.
The absence of transparent pricing from Counter limits direct cost comparison, but Counter’s free access model suggests a low barrier to entry versus protel PMS’s upfront cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter and protel PMS diverge fundamentally in their target hotel segments and feature depth. Counter serves hostels and small limited-service properties with a focus on ease of use, automation, and affordability, while protel PMS targets larger, branded, and multi-property hotels requiring extensive integrations, advanced revenue management, and multi-currency support.
Choose Counter if you operate a hostel or small property needing rapid deployment, mobile access, and a simple, reliable PMS with automated night audits and integrated channel management. Its top-rated support and high front desk usability reduce training time and operational overhead.
Choose protel PMS if your hotel demands a scalable, feature-rich PMS with robust multi-property management, extensive integrations (196 partners), and advanced guest services like digital registration and revenue management. Its cloud-native platform and comprehensive modules support complex workflows, international operations, and data-driven decision-making despite a steeper learning curve and less responsive support.
In sum, Counter excels in simplicity and support for hostels, while protel PMS provides versatility and depth for larger, multi-functional hotels. The choice hinges on property size, operational complexity, and feature priorities.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 196 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.2/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 14,Planet 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐