The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #27 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #15 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #32 2 条评价 | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #21 42 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #21 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #17 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #20 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #10 79 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Counter and protel PMS aim to streamline operations, but their core strengths and weaknesses differ significantly. Counter is built specifically for hostels, emphasizing ease of use and quick onboarding, while protel offers a more extensive feature set suited for larger, multi-property hotels with complex needs. How do these differences impact your decision?
Counter and protel both address fundamental hotel management challenges, including reservations, check-ins, and reporting. However, Counter's focus on simplicity and speed contrasts with protel’s aim for comprehensive, scalable solutions. Which of these priorities aligns better with your hotel's current challenges?
Counter is a free, user-friendly PMS designed primarily for hostels, with an intuitive interface and seamless mobile management. Its limited feature set—focusing on core operations—makes it ideal for small, independent properties that prioritize ease of use over extensive functionality.
Protel is a mature, robust cloud-native PMS with over 1,200 integrations, supporting complex multi-property workflows. Its extensive features include revenue management, multi-currency support, and detailed reporting, making it suitable for larger hotels or hotel groups. Which aligns better with your hotel’s size and complexity?
Counter's recent reviews are limited, with no new feedback in the past six months, but it boasts an overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews. Conversely, protel has a broader review base of 105, with more recent feedback, and a lower overall rating of 4.11/5, indicating more current user experiences. Do you value recent feedback more heavily?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing straightforward operations with minimal training, Counter is the clear choice. Its simple interface and automated features like POS and night audit simplify daily tasks without overwhelming users.
If you manage a larger hotel, resort, or multi-property portfolio requiring detailed reporting, revenue management, and extensive integrations, protel is the better fit. Its customizable environment and broad ecosystem of integrations support sophisticated operational needs.
For independent hotels that want quick deployment and a focus on guest experience without heavy tech overhead, Counter excels. Conversely, for hotel chains aiming for scalability and complex management, protel’s comprehensive tools provide long-term value.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s interface is praised in reviews for its clarity and simplicity, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating. Users report onboarding is quick, staff adopt the system rapidly, and managing reservations becomes intuitive, especially on mobile devices.
Protel’s interface, rated at 4.12/5, is generally user-friendly but can be overwhelming for new users due to its extensive features. Support and onboarding are reported to be slower, with some reviews mentioning a learning curve for complex functionalities.
Support staff at Counter receive frequent praise for their responsiveness, often replying within minutes, while protel’s support is criticized for slower response times, especially for complex issues. Which factor is more critical for your team—simplicity or comprehensive support?
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers three exclusive features: Channel Manager, Automated Night Audit, and a Mobile App—suitable for hostels needing streamlined operations and mobility. Its core features are minimal but effective for small-scale management.
Protel provides 30 features unique to its platform, including Revenue Management, Multi-currency, Guest Profiles, CRM, Gift Vouchers, Digital Registration, and advanced reporting tools. Its feature richness supports complex operational workflows and revenue optimization.
If your hotel prioritizes core functionalities with quick setup, Counter’s feature set is sufficient. If you need advanced features like rate management, integrated payment, and multi-lingual support, protel’s extensive capabilities are preferable.
Edge: protel.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting fast, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate ongoing improvements and the support team’s willingness to assist promptly.
Protel’s support rating is 3.95/5, with reviews frequently citing slow response times and difficulty resolving issues, especially post-acquisition. Some users suggest support could be more proactive and efficient.
Given the more recent and positive feedback, Counter’s customer support is the stronger choice for quick, reliable assistance.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds—mainly focusing on essential integrations for small properties.
Protel boasts over 1,200 integrations, including RMS, CRM, BI tools, and channel managers like SiteMinder and Innspire. This vast ecosystem allows hotels to connect a wide range of operational and revenue tools, ideal for larger or complex setups.
If your hotel requires broad integration options with many third-party systems, protel’s extensive ecosystem is unmatched. For smaller properties with limited integration needs, Counter’s select few integrations are adequate.
Edge: protel.
Counter’s reviews are limited but positive, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 reviews of hostel and independent hotel users, emphasizing ease of use and support.
Protel’s reviews are more diverse, with a 4.02/5 rating from 93 reviews across various hotel segments. Larger properties and hotel groups tend to rate protel higher due to its extensive features, despite some criticism of support delays.
Considering recent reviews, Counter’s higher and more consistent ratings reflect greater satisfaction among its niche user base.
Edge: Counter.
Counter is free, making it highly attractive for small hostels and budget properties. Its no-cost model includes core functionality, with optional paid upgrades or advanced features likely unavailable.
Protel charges a flat fee of $500 per month, with no free tier. Its cost reflects the extensive features and integration ecosystem, suitable for hotels with larger budgets seeking scalability.
If budget constraints are critical, Counter’s free model is compelling. For comprehensive, feature-rich management, protel’s investment may be justified.
Not ideal if your hotel needs complex revenue management, multi-property oversight, or extensive integrations. Larger resorts or chain hotels requiring detailed reporting and automation should look elsewhere.
Not ideal if your property is small, independent, or prioritizes ease over complexity. If budget is a concern, protel’s higher costs may also be a deterrent.
Counter is a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS tailored for hostels and small properties that prioritize simplicity and rapid deployment. Its limited but functional feature set, combined with high support ratings, makes it ideal for properties with basic operational needs.
Protel offers a highly customizable, feature-rich platform suited for larger hotels, chains, or resorts requiring detailed control, extensive integrations, and scalable solutions. Its strengths lie in automation, revenue management, and broad connectivity.
Choose Counter if your focus is on straightforward management, quick onboarding, and cost-effectiveness. Opt for protel if your hotel demands sophisticated operations, multi-property support, and extensive system integrations.
In conclusion, for small, independent properties or hostels, Counter is the more suitable choice. For larger, complex hotels aiming for growth and advanced control, protel is the better investment.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Planet 的为 33。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问