The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 577 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GraceSoft 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Employee Messaging.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 577 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 5 | 572 |
在分析了 577 条经验证的评价后,GraceSoft 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
|
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #36 3 条评价 | #5 214 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #8 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #8 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #35 2 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #32 3 条评价 | #4 149 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 2 条评价 | #5 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #34 0 条评价 | #3 72 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #24 1 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #33 1 条评价 | #1 445 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #8 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software (HMS) hinges on many factors, from ease of use to integrations and support. Both Easy Innkeeping by GraceSoft and RoomRaccoon HMS aim to streamline hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. Your decision should reflect your property size, tech needs, budget, and growth plans. Are you prioritizing a more established platform with extensive recent reviews or a more affordable, popular choice among small hotels?
While GraceSoft offers a straightforward, budget-friendly solution with a handful of features and a smaller review base, RoomRaccoon leads in user satisfaction, feature depth, and recent customer feedback. The question is: which system aligns best with your property’s current needs and future ambitions?
Both products serve the hotel management market but target different segments and operational styles. Easy Innkeeping is an all-in-one platform designed for small to midsized properties like inns, cabins, and vacation rentals, emphasizing reservation management and guest communication. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, combines property management, channel management, and booking capabilities into a single cloud-based system, with a focus on automation and scalability.
Where they diverge is in market presence and reviews. RoomRaccoon’s large base of 484 reviews, with recent feedback from 8 users in the last six months, indicates ongoing user engagement and evolving features. Easy Innkeeping’s only 5 reviews, all older and with no recent activity, offers less confidence in current performance or support.
Your choice depends on whether you prefer a lightweight, budget-conscious tool (Easy Innkeeping) or a highly-rated, feature-rich solution with a proven track record (RoomRaccoon). Do you need a system that adapts to growth and provides ongoing innovations? Or is simplicity and cost your priority?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, low-cost management tool focused primarily on reservations, guest communication, and CRM, Easy Innkeeping might suffice. It’s suitable for small properties with limited tech needs that prioritize ease of use over extensive automation or integrations. Its $300 monthly fee is attractive for properties with tight budgets but comes with limited features and a small review base.
However, if your hotel seeks a system capable of handling multiple channels, automating pricing, upselling, and offering a robust booking engine, RoomRaccoon is preferable. With a high overall rating of 4.95/5 and over 480 reviews—most recent—its platform demonstrates reliability and continuous improvement. It’s ideal for small to boutique hotels aiming to upscale their operations and guest experience.
In summary, choose Easy Innkeeping if budget and simplicity are key, but go with RoomRaccoon if you want a comprehensive, scalable platform backed by a large, recent user community.
Ease of use significantly influences staff adoption and operational efficiency. Easy Innkeeping scores 4.4/5 in user ratings, with users praising its straightforward interface and dedicated support. The onboarding process is rated 4.67/5, and reviews highlight that even staff with limited tech experience find it manageable, especially with GraceSoft’s support.
RoomRaccoon’s interface is rated even higher at 4.87/5, praised for its intuitive design that simplifies onboarding. Its onboarding process is slightly better-rated at 4.81/5, with many users emphasizing how quickly staff adapt to the system. Recent reviews highlight its user-friendly layout, which reduces training time and minimizes errors.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Easy Innkeeping offers 14 features unique to its platform, such as guest messaging, feedback management, and native email marketing—valuable for personalized guest communication. It shares 20 features with RoomRaccoon, including reservation management and reporting.
RoomRaccoon boasts 23 exclusive features, such as automated upselling, loyalty program integration, multi-currency support, and guest app functionalities—more advanced tools for guest engagement and revenue maximization. It also has 34 shared features, but its unique offerings surpass Easy Innkeeping’s.
Given the comprehensive feature set, RoomRaccoon provides more tools to grow and automate your business.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
GraceSoft scores a perfect 5/5 in customer support, with reviews emphasizing its prompt, courteous, and helpful service. Users praise the support team’s patience and responsiveness, stating it’s among the best support experiences they’ve encountered.
RoomRaccoon’s support is rated 4.74/5, with reviews noting its responsiveness and ongoing assistance. While generally positive, some users mention that after-sales support can sometimes lack immediacy, but most appreciate the company’s willingness to adapt and improve.
Edge: Easy Innkeeping.
RoomRaccoon’s integration count is 88 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment platforms, and other hotel systems. Its marketplace includes integrations with Sage, FLEXIPASS, Becurious, and many others, offering extensive connectivity.
GraceSoft, on the other hand, has no verified partners listed, limiting its ability to connect with external systems or third-party tools. This significantly restricts automation and data sharing capabilities.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.95/5 based on 484 reviews far exceeds GraceSoft’s 0/5 (with only 5 reviews). Recent reviews praise its reliability, feature depth, and ease of adoption, with users like Buff and Fellow and The Glen Boutique Hotel reporting increased revenue and time savings.
Conversely, GraceSoft’s reviews are all older, lack recent feedback, and are limited in number, which diminishes confidence in current performance or support.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Easy Innkeeping’s monthly fee is $300, with no mention of setup or implementation costs, making it an affordable choice. It offers a 30-day trial but no free tier or freemium model.
RoomRaccoon’s pricing starts at $1,000 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees specified. Its higher cost reflects its broader feature set and integration capabilities.
Both systems are subscription-based, but RoomRaccoon’s higher price correlates with its extensive features and integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel plans expansion, needs complex automation, or seeks extensive OTA connectivity.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a low-cost, minimal setup without many integrations or if you need offline capabilities.
RoomRaccoon clearly leads in reviews, features, integrations, and recent customer satisfaction. Its all-in-one platform suits hotels prepared to invest in automation and growth, offering a scalable solution with a wide partner network.
Easy Innkeeping offers a simple, cost-effective solution for very small properties with basic needs. Its limited features, small review base, and lack of recent feedback make it less suitable for hotels aiming to expand or automate.
If your hotel is looking to grow, automate, and improve guest experiences, RoomRaccoon is the stronger choice. Conversely, if your priorities are budget and simplicity, Easy Innkeeping might suffice—though with less confidence in ongoing support or performance.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 34 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 25 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ):否。RoomRaccoon HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GraceSoft 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问