The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 452 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成, 磁带图,而 Preno 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, channel management, 报告和分析。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
+
Dynamic Pricing
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | #13 80 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | #32 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | #39 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | #14 65 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | #21 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | #8 26 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | #27 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | #25 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | #13 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and revenue growth. innRoad and Preno both aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they differ markedly in features, support, and overall market presence. While innRoad offers a more extensive feature set and broader integration options, Preno shines in ease of use and recent user satisfaction. Your decision hinges on which priorities matter most for your property.
innRoad provides a comprehensive suite that covers nearly every aspect of hotel management, including channel management and revenue tools. Preno simplifies operations with a more intuitive interface and strong support, especially for multi-property management. Which of these align better with your hotel's current needs?
innRoad and Preno both target hoteliers seeking to automate and optimize their operations. innRoad’s strength lies in its rich feature set, including a booking engine, channel manager, and revenue management modules, all built to boost bookings and revenue. Preno, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing an accessible platform that minimizes training time.
innRoad boasts a higher overall rating (4.7/5 vs. Preno’s 4.73/5) and a larger review count (238 vs. 144), with recent reviews confirming its ongoing relevance. However, Preno’s more recent review activity—its latest review within the last six months—strengthens its feedback reliability. Does your team value extensive features over streamlined usability?
If your hotel operates multiple properties or needs advanced features like multi-currency, channel management, or in-house payment processing, innRoad is your best choice. Its 28 unique features, including a booking engine, gift vouchers, and task management, cater to hotels that require comprehensive control and automation.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes simplicity, rapid onboarding, and excellent support, Preno is preferable. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, small resorts, or properties wanting a straightforward system with robust integration, especially if you're emphasizing ease of use over extensive features. Your hotel’s complexity and growth plans should guide this decision.
Ease of use is a key differentiator. innRoad has a user rating of 4.49/5, with reviews citing some glitches, slow loading, and a less intuitive interface—especially for mobile use. Users praise innRoad’s customer support but note that onboarding can be more challenging, with some frustration over the learning curve.
Preno outperforms in usability with a 4.78/5 rating. Hotels find its interface clean and straightforward, with onboarding rated at 4.68/5. Recent reviews emphasize how easily staff adapt to Preno, making staff training faster and more effective. Edge: Preno.
innRoad offers 28 exclusive features not found in Preno, including multi-currency support, channel management, property and revenue management modules, digital registration, guest messaging, and integrated payment terminals. These features make innRoad a more flexible, all-in-one platform for hotels with complex needs.
Preno features only two functions exclusive to it: native email marketing and EPoS, which are useful but less comprehensive. Given the substantial feature count, innRoad is better suited for hotels requiring extensive operational tools. Edge: innRoad.
Customer support influences your experience significantly. innRoad’s reviews show a support rating of 4.54/5, with comments praising 24/7 live support, dedicated advisors, and helpful technical assistance. Some users mention occasional delays but overall value.
Preno receives a slightly higher rating of 4.8/5 and is praised for its prompt, friendly, and knowledgeable support. Recent reviews highlight how Preno’s support team quickly resolves issues, making daily operations smoother. Edge: Preno.
innRoad leads with 34 verified partners, including major names like QuickBooks, Revinate, and Impulsify. It supports a broad ecosystem, giving your hotel flexibility to connect with various revenue, marketing, and operations tools.
Preno offers 17 verified integrations, including Xero, SiteMinder, and TrustYou. While fewer, these are highly relevant for small to mid-sized properties seeking streamlined accounting and channel management. innRoad’s broader partnership network makes it the better choice for hotels with diverse tech stacks. Edge: innRoad.
Both products enjoy high overall ratings, but innRoad’s reviews are more numerous and recent, providing a more current perspective. innRoad’s 4.7/5 is based on 238 reviews, with hotel segments like boutique and budget properties giving strong ratings (around 4.72/5).
Preno’s 4.73/5 rating, from 144 reviews, is slightly higher but less recent overall. Boutique hotels and small resorts favor Preno’s ease of use, while innRoad receives praise from larger properties. Given the review volume and recency, innRoad’s rating reflects a more dependable consensus. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a flat base fee of $300, with no hidden or additional charges. Preno’s pricing starts at $800 per month, with no mention of discounts or tiered plans. The higher price suggests Preno is targeting smaller, boutique hotels with less complex needs, while innRoad’s more affordable model suits larger or more feature-demanding properties.
Your choice depends on your budget and required features: innRoad offers a more cost-effective, all-in-one solution, whereas Preno may justify its premium price with smoother usability and support.
Hotels that should consider innRoad:
Not ideal if:
InnRoad works best for mid to large-sized hotels, resorts, and properties with complex operational needs.
Hotels suitable for Preno:
Not ideal if:
Preno is ideal for small to medium properties, especially boutique hotels, that want a straightforward platform with excellent support.
innRoad delivers a broad, feature-rich PMS tailored for hotels with complex management demands. Its extensive integrations, revenue tools, and channel management make it well-suited for larger or multi-property operations seeking automation and growth.
Preno excels in simplicity and support, making it perfect for boutique hotels and small resorts prioritizing ease of use and rapid onboarding. Its clean interface and dedicated team help hotels reduce training time and focus on guest experiences.
If your hotel needs a powerful, all-encompassing solution with advanced features, innRoad is the clear winner. For properties that prefer a user-friendly, supportive environment with essential tools, Preno is the smarter choice.
In conclusion, choose innRoad if your hotel requires extensive features and integrations. Opt for Preno if your priority is ease of use, support, and a straightforward system.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
支持团队通常因其响应迅速、乐于助人而备受赞誉,尽管一些评论指出,他们可能会出现延迟,尤其是在周末或繁忙时段。响应速度和与支持人员的直接联系至关重要。
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Preno 的报告功能褒贬不一,一些用户对其易用性感到满意,而另一些用户则希望获得更深入的分析,以便做出更明智的战略决策。一些用户表示需要定制报告功能。
尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出... 尽管一些用户对 Preno 的功能表示赞赏,但也有人呼吁其移动应用功能更加强大。评论表明,增强移动应用的离线功能和更丰富的功能将提升其可用性,尤其对于经常出差的管理人员而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 Preno 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。Preno:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Preno 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问