The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #22 4 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 2 条评价 | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #14 1 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #19 3 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #21 0 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Guest Services by SmartStay (Liverton) and STAY Guest App hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational goals, and guest experience vision. Both products aim to streamline guest interactions, but they diverge in features, ease of use, and market presence. Your decision should reflect which platform aligns best with your hotel's size, guest profile, and digital maturity.
Liverton’s Guest Services emphasizes digital check-in, upselling, and in-room service interactions primarily through QR codes and integrations with PMS. STAY’s Guest App offers a broader range of guest-centric features, from real-time updates to extensive service digitization, supporting larger hotel networks and multi-property operations.
Are you prioritizing a comprehensive guest app with extensive service options or a tailored digital check-in and upsell platform? Let's explore how they compare across key factors.
Both Liverton and STAY address the core challenge of elevating guest engagement and operational efficiency. Liverton’s platform specifically centers on digital check-in, room selection, and in-room requests, integrating with property systems to facilitate upselling and contactless access. Conversely, STAY offers a complete guest experience OS that digitizes nearly all hotel services, from reservations to amenities, with a focus on reducing front desk queues and maximizing revenue.
Liverton shines with its emphasis on digital check-in and key issuance, ideal for hotels seeking to enhance arrivals and departures. STAY excels at providing a broad, integrated guest engagement ecosystem suitable for properties aiming to digitize their entire service spectrum.
Which features matter most to your hotel’s digital transformation journey?
If your hotel needs a digital check-in system that handles room selection, pre-arrival upselling, and mobile key issuance, Liverton is your partner. It’s especially suited for hotels wanting to modernize check-in processes and enable in-room service requests via QR codes, with a focus on integration with PMS and POS systems.
If you require a broader guest experience platform that offers real-time updates, service ordering, guest messaging, and detailed analytics, STAY is the better choice. Its extensive feature set, proven in large chains and resorts, supports hotels looking for a full-service digital guest experience.
Hotels focused on frontline check-in efficiency and mobile key solutions should lean toward Liverton, while those aiming for comprehensive guest engagement and service digitization should opt for STAY.
Both platforms are designed with user-friendliness in mind, but STAY’s interface garners higher praise with a 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating, compared to Liverton’s 4.57/5. Overall, STAY’s mobile app and CMS are recognized for their intuitive navigation, easy content updates, and straightforward guest interactions. Liverton’s platform also scores well but may require more technical onboarding due to its specialized features like digital check-in portals and device-agnostic options.
Based on recent reviews and user feedback, STAY offers a slightly simpler, smoother experience for staff and guests alike.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Liverton provides 20 unique features, including hotel website check-in portals, lobby kiosks, self-service check-in/out, device agnosticism, document scanning, ID verification, and door lock integration. Its focus is on streamlining arrival, check-in, and in-room requests, with capabilities for pre-arrival upselling and contactless access.
STAY offers 14 features but covers a broader spectrum: mobile app access, chatbot, automated replies, request management, room service ordering, hotel directory, local recommendations, and guest profiles. Its features aim for a comprehensive digital guest experience beyond just check-in.
While Liverton excels in check-in and access features, STAY’s broader feature set supports end-to-end guest engagement.
Edge: Liverton — thanks to its extensive suite of check-in, security, and upsell features.
STAY’s support ratings are slightly higher, with a 4.83/5 score versus Liverton’s 4.29/5. Review comments highlight STAY’s quick issue resolution, helpful onboarding, and ongoing support, though some users mention limited phone support and regional hours. Liverton’s technical support is recognized as knowledgeable, but some users experienced delays or difficulties during trial phases.
Given the recent review volume and support ratings, STAY provides more responsive and reliable support for hotel teams.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY’s platform integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and reservation systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SiteMinder. It offers extensive native integrations, enabling seamless data flow and operational automation.
Liverton supports 8 integrations, including Shiji Group, RMS, and Cloudbeds, but with fewer options. The limited partner network may restrict integration flexibility for larger or more complex tech stacks.
STAY’s broader integration network makes it a more adaptable choice for hotels with diverse systems.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY’s reviews are significantly more recent—over 200 in the past six months—offering fresh insights into user satisfaction. Its 3/5 rating is based on large, diverse properties, with praise for operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.
Liverton’s 7 reviews are older and less recent, with consistent but limited feedback. Given the volume and recency, STAY enjoys higher confidence in current user satisfaction.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Liverton charges a base fee of $500, with no freemium or monthly per-room charges, and no implementation fees. Its pricing may be suitable for smaller hotels or those seeking a straightforward, fixed-cost solution.
STAY’s pricing starts at $300, with no additional implementation fees or monthly charges, making it slightly more affordable. Pricing details suggest a simple flat-rate model, advantageous for mid-sized hotels.
Pricing is competitive, but STAY offers a more flexible, transparent price point.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a full-service guest app beyond check-in and access, or if you require broad digital communication features.
Not ideal if your focus is solely on digital check-in or you operate a small boutique hotel with minimal service digitization needs.
Core difference: Liverton’s Guest Services centers on digital check-in, keyless entry, and upselling, while STAY provides a broad, all-in-one guest experience platform.
When to choose Liverton: If your hotel’s priority is modernizing arrivals, automating check-in/out, and improving in-room service with QR codes and mobile keys, Liverton is the right fit. Its suite of check-in, documentation, and security features make it ideal for properties focused on operational efficiency at arrival and departure.
When to choose STAY: If your goal is a full-service guest app that enhances overall guest satisfaction through real-time updates, service requests, messaging, and content management, STAY offers a more expansive, flexible solution. Its proven track record in large chains and resorts confirms its ability to scale and support diverse guest needs.
Final recommendation: For hotels seeking a dedicated check-in and access solution, Liverton’s Guest Services is suitable. For those wanting a comprehensive, multi-feature guest engagement platform, STAY Guest App is the clearer choice.
In terms of recent reviews, STAY’s higher volume and freshness of feedback make it the more reliable indicator of current performance and user satisfaction.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Guest Services by SmartStay 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Guest Services by SmartStay 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Guest Services by SmartStay:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Liverton 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问