The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
18件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
Asana 優れています .
LIKE MAGIC 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて 、Mobile access on any deviceなどの独自機能を備えています.
HTRの18件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| 認証済みレビュー | 2 | 16 |
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別のスタッフ間のコラボレーションツールベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #14 1件のレビュー | #7 7件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #25 1件のレビュー | #16 5件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) | — | #19 2件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #17 5件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー | #26 1件のレビュー | #24 2件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン | #26 1件のレビュー | #25 1件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #8 8件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #32 1件のレビュー | #33 0件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #23 1件のレビュー | #6 15件のレビュー |
When evaluating staff collaboration tools for your hotel, you face a choice between Asana and LIKE MAGIC. Both aim to improve team coordination and streamline operations, but they serve different needs. Asana is a well-established project management platform, while LIKE MAGIC is a hotel-specific, automation-driven guest experience platform. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products address operational inefficiencies, but they approach the problem differently. Asana focuses on task and project management for teams, whereas LIKE MAGIC automates guest interactions and routine tasks. Are you looking to enhance internal collaboration or guest-facing automation? That’s the core question.
The more recent reviews and the higher review count favor LIKE MAGIC. With 16 reviews in the last six months and a 99% likelihood to recommend, LIKE MAGIC’s data is more current and reliable. Asana’s only two reviews, both older, make its ratings less representative of today’s performance. So, which product do you trust more based on recent user feedback?
Both products aim to improve operational workflows, but they are designed for different aspects of hotel management. Asana offers a simple, flexible tool for task tracking and team communication, suitable for various industries but not purpose-built for hospitality. LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, is a dedicated hotel operations platform that automates guest interactions from booking to checkout.
Asana’s core strength lies in its ability to organize internal team tasks, with a 4/5 ease-of-use rating and mostly positive reviews about managing communication and teamwork. It’s used mainly by standard hotels and is appreciated for its versatility in non-hotel settings. However, its lack of hotel-specific features and integrations can be a drawback.
LIKE MAGIC excels in automating guest journeys with 12 unique features, including digital check-in, in-room dining, and automated messaging. Its 5/5 ease of use rating and near-perfect customer support score (4.88/5) reflect its hotel-specific design, making it ideal for properties seeking to reduce staff and enhance guest experiences. Which platform better suits your hotel’s operational focus?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
If your hotel needs a dedicated platform to automate guest interactions and reduce staffing costs, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its automation features—integrations with PMS, digital keys, guest messaging, and self-service capabilities—are unmatched and designed specifically for hotel operations.
If your team primarily needs a straightforward project management tool to organize internal tasks and improve communication, Asana is suitable, especially for hotels with smaller or less complex operations. However, given its limited hotel-specific features and the small volume of recent reviews, it’s less ideal for hotels aiming for digital guest experience enhancements.
For properties focused on internal team productivity without guest-facing automation, Asana could suffice. But for hotels committed to automating guest journeys and operational workflows, LIKE MAGIC offers a comprehensive, purpose-built solution. Which aligns with your immediate needs?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s interface is rated 4/5 and is praised for being simple and open, helping teams adopt the platform with some training. Its onboarding score (3/5) indicates a decent experience but may require internal effort to standardize usage across teams.
LIKE MAGIC’s interface scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with a nearly perfect onboarding score of 4.93/5. Its hotel-specific design minimizes staff training time and reduces onboarding friction, especially for properties with limited tech experience.
Based on recent reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s intuitive platform and quick setup give it a notable edge for hotels seeking rapid deployment without extensive training.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana offers 0 unique hotel-specific features, focusing mainly on task tracking, communication, and project management. Its strengths lie in general collaboration tools, but it lacks automation for guest services or operational workflows.
LIKE MAGIC provides 12 distinct features tailored for hospitality, including work prioritization, real-time task tracking, file libraries, automated replies, multi-property monitoring, and an open API. These features directly support automating guest interactions, staff workflows, and service delivery, making it the more feature-rich choice for hotels.
Given the hotel-specific features and integrations, LIKE MAGIC clearly stands out. If you need automation and guest journey management, it offers more relevant tools.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s customer support score of 2.5/5 reflects mixed reviews. Some users find it difficult to get timely help, and onboarding can be inconsistent, requiring additional internal effort.
LIKE MAGIC boasts a support rating of 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and dedicated assistance. Hotel clients praise the platform’s ongoing product evolution and attentive support, which enhances their operational confidence.
For hotels prioritizing reliable, responsive support, LIKE MAGIC’s high rating makes it the preferable option.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with hotel systems directly. This can restrict its usefulness in a hotel environment where seamless data flow is essential.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including PMS systems like 4SUITES, apaleo, and Mews, as well as payment and guest messaging platforms. These integrations streamline operations and reduce manual data entry.
If integrations are crucial for your hotel’s technology ecosystem, LIKE MAGIC’s broader connectivity provides a significant advantage.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s reviews are limited and older, with a 4.5/5 overall rating based on only 2 reviews. Its users appreciate its simplicity but note its lack of hotel-specific features.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews, totaling 16 in the last six months, give it a 4.88/5 customer support score and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across Europe and Asia Pacific, particularly extended stay and boutique properties, praise its automation and operational efficiencies.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s user ratings are more indicative of current performance and satisfaction.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana does not publicly disclose pricing, and it offers a free basic version limited to small teams. Larger teams or advanced features require custom pricing, which can be costly and complex to scale.
LIKE MAGIC charges a flat fee of $1,100 per month, with no free tier or trial. This fee grants access to its full suite of hotel-specific features and integrations.
For clarity and predictability, LIKE MAGIC’s straightforward pricing makes it easier for hotels to budget and evaluate ROI.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Asana is suitable for basic internal collaboration but less so for automating guest services.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
LIKE MAGIC is best for hotels committed to digital guest experience transformation.
The core difference lies in their purpose: Asana is a general project management tool, while LIKE MAGIC is tailored for hotel operations automation. If your priority is internal team collaboration without guest-facing features, Asana might suffice, but it lacks hotel-specific integrations and automation.
Choose Asana if your team needs a flexible internal collaboration platform and your hotel’s operations are simple. However, for hotels seeking to streamline guest interactions, automate workflows, and reduce staffing, LIKE MAGIC provides a more suitable, hotel-centric solution.
When to choose Asana: You’re focused on internal team productivity, have a small team, and don’t require guest automation. When to choose LIKE MAGIC: Your goal is to automate guest journeys, reduce staffing costs, and integrate seamlessly with your property systems.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction through automation, LIKE MAGIC is the stronger choice. Its recent reviews, hotel-specific features, and broader integrations make it the more reliable, future-proof solution.
スタッフ間のコラボレーションツール の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
HTRの製品データベースによると、AsanaとLIKE MAGIC (Staff App)は0個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ケース管理 | ||
| ファイルライブラリのサポート(画像、ドキュメント、ビデオ) | ||
| リアルタイムのタスク追跡 | ||
| レイトチェックアウト | ||
| 仮想航海日誌 | ||
| 作業の優先順位付け |
4件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
高評価の分野
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。AsanaとLIKE MAGIC (Staff App)は多くの主要なStaff Collaboration Tools機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Asanaは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、LIKE MAGIC (Staff App)は10件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App)は使いやすさで5.0/5対4.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Asana:いいえ。LIKE MAGIC (Staff App):いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのStaff Collaboration Toolsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。AsanaのHT Scoreは0、LIKE MAGICは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
お客様の物件に合わせたカスタム提案