Folio Pay vs. roommaster Payments: あなたに最適なのはどちら?

May 21, 2026更新  ·  26件の認証済みレビューを分析

まとめ

26件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:

Folio 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて .

roommaster 優れています 、Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenizationなどの独自機能を備えています.

詳細な比較は以下をご覧ください ↓

Folio Payとroommaster Paymentsの比較

HTRの26件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。

HTScore
0
0
推奨度
100%
89%
使いやすさ
5.0/5
4.2/5
カスタマーサポート
5.0/5
4.3/5
コストパフォーマンス
5.0/5
4.0/5
開始価格 Contact sales From $300/mo
認証済みレビュー 3 23

Folio vs roommaster:ホテルセグメント別ランキング

各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の決済処理ソフトウェアベンダー内ランキング。

ホテル規模別

セグメント Folio Folio roommaster roommaster
小規模(10〜24室) #2 6件のレビュー
中規模(25〜74室) #3 7件のレビュー
大規模(75〜199室) #4 3件のレビュー #4 1件のレビュー
特大規模(200室以上) #4 0件のレビュー

施設タイプ別

セグメント Folio Folio roommaster roommaster
ブティック #4 7件のレビュー
ラグジュアリー #5 1件のレビュー #5 0件のレビュー
ブランド/チェーン #5 2件のレビュー #4 1件のレビュー
長期滞在型 #4 0件のレビュー

地域別

セグメント Folio Folio roommaster roommaster
北米 #5 3件のレビュー #4 14件のレビュー
ヨーロッパ #5 0件のレビュー
中東 #3 0件のレビュー

The Decision

Choosing between Folio Pay by Folio and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Folio Pay offers a modern, cloud-based solution focused on streamlining supplier payments and maximizing rebates, while roommaster Payments emphasizes seamless integration within your PMS to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and operational workflows. As a hotelier, your decision should reflect whether you prioritize financial control and cashback incentives or integrated operational efficiency.

Both products aim to improve payment workflows, but their core approaches diverge. Folio Pay’s strength lies in transforming accounts payable into a strategic financial tool with rebates, whereas roommaster Payments emphasizes reducing manual effort and chargebacks through tight integration. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?

Is Folio Pay or roommaster Payments Better for Hotels?

Folio Pay and roommaster Payments are designed to address different hotel payment challenges. Folio Pay is ideal if your hotel needs a comprehensive platform to manage supplier payments, improve cash flow, and earn rebates—especially if you’re looking to modernize your accounts payable process. Conversely, roommaster Payments targets hotels seeking to streamline internal payment workflows within their existing property management system, with a focus on deposits, pre-authorizations, and reducing manual labor.

Folio Pay’s cloud-based nature offers greater flexibility, with an all-in-one payment hub that consolidates scheduling and execution of supplier payments, supported by features like ACH transfers and Mastercard® prepaid options. Roommaster Payments, on the other hand, emphasizes operational integration, automating deposits and pre-authorizations directly within your PMS, which can be crucial for daily hotel operations.

The reviews reveal that Folio Pay's recent updates and high customer satisfaction—rated 5/5 for ease of use and support—make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking financial control. Roommaster’s mixed reviews about system outages and support issues suggest that while it’s feature-rich, it may face stability challenges.

Are your hotel’s core needs financial management and rebates, or operational efficiency and system stability?

Folio Pay vs roommaster Payments: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel prioritizes strategic financial management, cash rebates, and modern supplier payment workflows, Folio Pay is the clear choice. Its recent review count of 3, all within the last six months, coupled with a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend, indicates strong current confidence among users.

For hotels that require an integrated payments solution primarily to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and reduce manual processing within their PMS, roommaster Payments is suitable. However, it has a limited review base—20 reviews, with only 9 recent ones—and a slightly lower likelihood to recommend at 89%. Its more extensive feature set (13 features exclusive to it) makes it attractive for hotels with complex payment needs but also exposes it to potential stability issues noted in user feedback.

Your decision hinges on whether you need a modern, rebate-optimized platform (Folio Pay) or a tightly integrated operational tool (roommaster Payments).

Is Folio Pay or roommaster Payments Easier to Use?

Folio Pay earns a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, supported by recent reviews praising its straightforward interface and intuitive workflows. Users highlight that “it’s an excellent tool” and “easy to purchase,” with onboarding rated 5/5, indicating quick adoption and minimal training hurdles.

Roommaster Payments scores 4.4/5, with reviews citing its ease of use but noting glitches during busy periods and some frustrations with system outages. Support staff are praised for helpfulness, but the overall user experience is marred by instability and slower workflows.

Edge: Folio Pay.

Which Has Better Features: Folio Pay or roommaster Payments?

Folio Pay’s core offering is its all-in-one payment hub, with no additional features listed beyond payment processing. In contrast, roommaster Payments boasts 13 exclusive features, including authorization adjustments, refund management, contactless payments, tokenization, and PCI compliance—crucial for hotels requiring diverse payment options.

While Folio Pay excels in cash rebates and supplier payment control, roommaster Payments offers advanced features for deposit handling, chargeback management, and in-system payment splitting. Given the feature count and recent positive reviews, roommaster Payments has a slight edge for hotels seeking operational depth.

Edge: roommaster Payments.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Folio Pay or roommaster Payments?

Folio Pay’s reviews indicate a perfect 5/5 support rating, with comments like “support is great” and “they answer calls promptly.” The recent review count (3) suggests current positive experiences and high satisfaction.

roommaster Payments has a support rating of 4.45/5, with feedback pointing to helpful staff but also frustrations over outages and inconsistent issue resolution. The larger review base (20 reviews, with some highlighting system errors and slow support during outages) indicates lower overall confidence.

Edge: Folio Pay.

Which Has More Integrations: Folio Pay or roommaster Payments?

roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major hospitality technology providers such as Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia. This extensive network makes it suitable for hotels needing diverse third-party integrations within their PMS environment.

Folio Pay, with zero verified integrations, appears more standalone and less flexible if your hotel relies heavily on external systems. If seamless integration is a priority, roommaster Payments clearly leads.

Edge: roommaster Payments.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Folio Pay or roommaster Payments?

Folio Pay, with only 3 recent reviews, has a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend from all reviewers, suggesting high satisfaction when it is used. However, the limited review count makes this less conclusive.

roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews and an 89% likelihood to recommend, shows generally positive feedback but some frustrations with outages, stability, and support. Given the recent reviews, Folio Pay’s higher recent confidence makes it the stronger rated product currently.

Edge: Folio Pay.

How Much Do Folio Pay and roommaster Payments Cost?

Folio Pay’s pricing details are not publicly available, indicating it may follow a custom quote model suited to larger enterprise clients or those with significant supplier payment needs. No free trial or flat rate info is provided.

roommaster Payments charges a flat fee of $300/month, with no mention of tiered pricing. This straightforward pricing makes it easy to budget for, though it may be costly for smaller hotels relying on fewer transactions.

Folio Pay’s lack of transparent pricing suggests it’s aimed at hotels with higher transaction volumes or complex financial needs, while roommaster Payments offers predictable costs for operational integration.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Folio Pay?

  • Hotels that want to modernize and optimize supplier payments, especially those seeking to earn rebates on spend.
  • Teams that require a flexible, cloud-based platform with control over accounts payable.
  • Hotels aiming for better visibility and transparency in financial transactions.
  • Hotels that value cashback incentives and strategic cash flow management.
  • Not ideal if your hotel has minimal supplier payments or prefers highly integrated PMS payment features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use roommaster Payments?

  • Hotels that need comprehensive payment automation directly within their property management system.
  • Teams that want to streamline deposits, pre-authorizations, and chargeback management.
  • Hotels that handle a high volume of transactions and require robust features like tokenization and PCI compliance.
  • Hotels seeking extensive third-party integrations to connect with existing technology stacks.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes rebate programs or requires a standalone financial platform.

roommaster Payments vs Folio Pay: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference is that Folio Pay emphasizes financial rewards and strategic accounts payable management, while roommaster Payments focuses on operational transaction efficiency within the PMS. Folio Pay, with a recent surge of reviews and perfect support ratings, offers a more current and reliable solution for hotels looking to modernize their financial workflows.

Choose Folio Pay if your hotel seeks rebates, transparent control over supplier payments, and a cloud-based, easy-to-use platform. Opt for roommaster Payments if your hotel needs comprehensive in-system payment features, extensive integrations, and a solution embedded within daily operations.

In conclusion, for hotels that want a modern, well-reviewed, and highly supported payment platform, Folio Pay stands out as the preferable choice. However, if your hotel’s primary focus is operational depth, integration, and automation, roommaster Payments remains a solid, feature-rich option—though with some caveats about stability and support.

Folio Payとroommaster Paymentsの費用は?

決済処理ソフトウェア の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。

Folio Folio roommaster roommaster
Starting Price From $300/mo

Folio Payにあってroommaster Paymentsにない機能(およびその逆)は?

HTRの製品データベースによると、Folio Payとroommaster Paymentsは0個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。

機能 Folio Folio roommaster roommaster
Visaを受け入れる
チップ機能
パーシャルキャプチャ
リンクで支払う
承認の調整
返金管理

主な違いを表示しています。これらの製品間にはさらに1個の異なる機能があります。

Folio vs roommaster:まとめ

Folio
Folio
3件のレビューで5.0/5
使いやすさ 5.0/5 サポート 5.0/5 0件の連携
プロフィールを見る
roommaster
roommaster
23件のレビューで4.5/5

高評価の分野

空港・会議ホテル #4 vs #10

独自の機能

承認の調整 返金管理 リンクで支払う チップ機能 パーシャルキャプチャ
使いやすさ 4.4/5 サポート 4.5/5 56件の連携
プロフィールを見る

評価が最も分かれる分野

使いやすさ Folio 5.0 vs 4.4 (+0.6)
カスタマーサポート Folio 5.0 vs 4.5 (+0.6)
コストパフォーマンス Folio 5.0 vs 4.2 (+0.8)
オンボーディング Folio 5.0 vs 4.1 (+0.9)

Folio Pay vs roommaster Paymentsに関するよくある質問

Folio Payはroommaster Paymentsの代わりになりますか?

お客様の要件次第です。Folio Payとroommaster Paymentsは多くの主要なPayments Processing Software機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Folio Payは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、roommaster Paymentsは56件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。

小規模または独立系ホテルにはどちらが適していますか?

小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Folio Payは使いやすさで5.0/5対4.2/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。

Folio Payまたはroommaster Paymentsに無料プランはありますか?

Folio Pay:いいえ。roommaster Payments:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのPayments Processing Softwareベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。

HTRはFolio Payとroommaster Paymentsをどのように評価・ランク付けしていますか?

HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。FolioのHT Scoreは0、roommasterは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。

基準グループ ウェイト 測定内容
顧客評価とレビュー

ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか?

評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例

最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。

パートナーエコシステム

テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか?

パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質

パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。

顧客中心主義

この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか?

認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性

企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。

リーチ、継続性、リソース

この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか?

地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア

グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。

顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →

パーソナライズされた製品推奨事項を取得する

製品推奨アドバイザー

Ghostel icon

ホテル情報を調べてみましょう