The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
549件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを最も評価し、VIPSのユーザーはを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #5 219件のレビュー | — |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #3 238件のレビュー | — |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | #2 46件のレビュー | — |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | #8 7件のレビュー | — |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #5 239件のレビュー | — |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | #3 241件のレビュー | — |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | #4 143件のレビュー | — |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | #4 49件のレビュー | — |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #52 4件のレビュー | — |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #2 384件のレビュー | — |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | #5 111件のレビュー | — |
| 中東 ▾ | #1 21件のレビュー | — |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) can dramatically impact your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and profitability. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and VIPS PMS by VIPS both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and market focus. HotelTime’s extensive feature set and broad regional presence position it as the more mature, reliable choice for most hotels.
Your team needs a system that not only covers your basic operational needs but also integrates seamlessly with other tools and scales with your property. Which of these PMS solutions aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
HotelTime PMS is a cloud-based platform designed to serve a wide range of properties, from boutique hotels to large resorts, with over 650 properties globally. Its highly rated features—such as advanced integration capabilities, extensive modules, and a comprehensive guest CRM—make it suitable for hotels seeking a centralized, adaptable solution.
VIPS PMS, on the other hand, offers a versatile yet less feature-rich platform with a focus on simplifying daily operations through modular tools. While it supports online bookings, guest communication, and self-service check-ins, it has a much smaller market presence and fewer integrations.
HotelTime boasts a 91.17/100 HTR Score, a 4.83/5 overall rating, and 433 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its continued relevance. VIPS, with zero reviews and a lack of recent user feedback, cannot match its credibility or proven track record.
Is your hotel looking for a trusted, well-established PMS with proven results? If so, HotelTime is the clear choice.
If you need a comprehensive, scalable system that supports large and complex operations, HotelTime PMS is the better fit. Its broad feature set—which includes guest profiles, multi-currency support, spa & wellness modules, and a mobile app—caters to diverse hotel types, including resorts, city hotels, and branded properties.
VIPS is more suited for smaller or mid-sized hotels that want straightforward management tools without the extra bells and whistles. If your property primarily needs basic reservation management, online check-ins, and simplified communication, VIPS might suffice—though its limited reviews and lack of recent feedback diminish confidence in its effectiveness.
For properties that value extensive integration options, multiple modules, and a proven track record, HotelTime’s larger number of verified partners (58 vs 11 for VIPS) give it a marked advantage.
HotelTime PMS’s user interface receives a 4.66/5 rating, and users consistently praise its intuitive design and ease of onboarding. Its onboarding score of 4.63/5 reflects well-structured support, although some users note that the system's multiple modules can introduce initial complexity.
VIPS, with no available ratings or recent reviews, offers limited information on user experience. Its smaller employee count and lack of documented customer feedback suggest a less mature support infrastructure.
Given the extensive positive reviews and high usability ratings, HotelTime’s platform is easier for staff to adopt, train on, and operate daily. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 43 shared features plus 8 exclusive modules, including guest CRM, multi-currency support, integrated ID scanners, online checkout, and a comprehensive spa & wellness module. These features support a fully integrated hotel operation, from front desk to back-office management.
VIPS provides only two features unique to its platform: centralized messaging and automated assignments, with a total of 45 features. However, it lacks the depth and variety found in HotelTime’s modules, limiting its scalability and customization.
HotelTime’s broader feature set and dedicated modules position it as the more capable platform for hotels aiming for full operational control. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with numerous reviews highlighting responsiveness, knowledgeable assistance, and proactive onboarding. Customers report that HotelTime staff go above and beyond to resolve issues quickly and help implement new features.
VIPS, with no recent reviews or ratings available, provides no clear insight into support quality. Its smaller team size and absence of testimonials suggest less dedicated customer service and onboarding support.
For reliable, prompt, and expert support, HotelTime’s established reputation and positive feedback make it the stronger choice. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, covering a broad spectrum of third-party services like RevControl, SiteMinder, and STR. Its extensive integration ecosystem enables hotels to connect with booking engines, revenue management, and other operational tools efficiently.
VIPS offers only 11 verified integrations, including popular tools like Omnitec Systems and RoomChecking, but its ecosystem is smaller and less diverse.
If your property depends on a wide array of integrations for smooth operations, HotelTime’s larger partner network provides a clear advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 and NPS score of 9.26/10 derive from 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, feature richness, and customer support. It is particularly favored by luxury, resort, and city-center hotels.
VIPS, lacking recent reviews or ratings, offers no data to support user satisfaction claims. The absence of feedback diminishes confidence in its performance or customer experience.
HotelTime’s more established presence and recent positive reviews solidify its reputation among hoteliers. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or monthly per-room charges. Its straightforward pricing model provides transparency for hotels evaluating ROI.
VIPS charges $800 per month, also with no free tier or additional fees. Despite being slightly more expensive, VIPS’s limited feature set and lack of recent reviews make its value proposition less compelling.
Based on available data, HotelTime offers a more competitive and transparent pricing structure. Edge: HotelTime.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime PMS stands out with its extensive feature set, proven market presence, and high user satisfaction. Its broad integration network and scalability make it suitable for a wide range of properties, from boutique hotels to large resorts.
VIPS, with fewer features, limited integrations, and no recent reviews, appears better suited for small properties with simple needs. Its lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence, and it’s less likely to support complex or growing hotel operations.
For hotels seeking a dependable, feature-rich PMS with a track record of client success, HotelTime remains the clear choice. If your property is small, simple, and budget-conscious, VIPS could be an option, but it lacks the credibility and support infrastructure of HotelTime.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。HotelTime PMSとVIPS PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。HotelTime PMSは58件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、VIPS PMSは11件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
HotelTime PMS:いいえ。VIPS PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。HOTELTIMEのHT Scoreは91、VIPSは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー