The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Samenvatting
We hebben 23 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen geanalyseerd, functiesets, prijzen en praktijkcasestudies vergeleken om te bepalen waar elk platform uitblinkt. De juiste keuze hangt af van uw type accommodatie en prioriteiten:
PXP blinkt uit , met exclusieve functies zoals Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
roommaster blinkt uit in ease of use and customer support , met exclusieve functies zoals Payment Splitting.
Zij-aan-zij beoordelingen op basis van 23 geverifieerde hotelierbeoordelingen op HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen |
|
|
| Gebruiksgemak |
|
|
| Klantenondersteuning |
|
|
| Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding |
|
|
| Vanafprijs | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
| Geverifieerde beoordelingen | 0 | 23 |
Hoe elk product scoort onder Software voor betalingsverwerking-leveranciers voor verschillende accommodatiegroottes, -typen en regio's — op basis van geverifieerde beoordelingen van hoteliers in elk segment.
Op hotelgrootte
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Klein (10-24 kamers) ▾ | — | #2 6 beoordelingen |
| Middelgroot (25-74 kamers) ▾ | — | #3 7 beoordelingen |
| Groot (75-199 kamers) | — | #4 1 beoordelingen |
| Extra groot (200+ kamers) | — | #4 0 beoordelingen |
Op accommodatietype
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 beoordelingen |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 beoordelingen |
| Merk / Keten | — | #4 1 beoordelingen |
| Langverblijf | — | #4 0 beoordelingen |
Op regio
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Noord-Amerika ▾ | — | #4 14 beoordelingen |
| Europa | — | #5 0 beoordelingen |
| Midden-Oosten | — | #3 0 beoordelingen |
Both PXP by PXP and roommaster Payments aim to streamline hotel payment processes, but they approach this goal from different angles. PXP offers a comprehensive payment platform with multiple payment options and global reach, while roommaster Payments focuses on deep integration within your existing property management system (PMS) to reduce manual work and improve operational efficiency. How do these differences impact your hotel’s specific needs?
PXP’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating suggest it’s unproven in current hotel environments, whereas roommaster’s more recent feedback and higher customer support scores indicate a more reliable choice. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
While PXP promises a broad set of features and multiple payment options, it lacks recent user feedback and a clear satisfaction record. roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews in the past six months and an NPS score of 8.4/10, demonstrates higher customer satisfaction and ongoing support. Given the importance of reliable support in payments processing, roommaster is the stronger choice at this moment.
In terms of overall ratings and recent review activity, roommaster Payments far exceeds PXP. Its ease of use, customer support, and positive hotel segment ratings make it the more dependable option for your hotel today.
PXP and roommaster Payments both promise to simplify payments, but they serve different hotel profiles. PXP provides a global, multi-channel payment ecosystem with extensive payment method support, ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs multi-currency settlement options like DCC and accepts diverse payment methods including Apple Pay, Paypal, and American Express.
roommaster Payments, on the other hand, is designed for hotels wanting seamless integration within their PMS, with features like deposit handling, pre-authorizations, and dispute resolution built into the system. If your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, automated reconciliation, and reducing manual workload, roommaster is more suitable.
However, PXP’s lack of recent user reviews and an overall 0/5 rating make it difficult to recommend confidently. Do you need a proven, well-supported system, or are you prepared to navigate potential instability with a less-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a proven, support-rich system with a strong hotel user base and recent positive reviews, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 recent reviews in the last six months and an 8.4/10 NPS demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction and reliable support—crucial for payment systems.
If, however, your hotel requires a payment platform with diverse payment options supporting global currencies and multiple processors, PXP might seem appealing. But given the absence of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, its long-term reliability is questionable. For most hotels, especially those prioritizing stability and support, roommaster Payments is the safer choice.
roommaster Payments scores a high 4.4/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its straightforward integration and intuitive interface. Users highlight that support staff like Aladdein are helpful and resolve issues promptly, reflecting a strong support team.
In contrast, PXP’s interface and usability are unverified, and no recent reviews or ratings are available to confirm its user-friendliness. Given the critical importance of smooth payment workflows, roommaster’s more recent positive feedback makes it the clear winner here.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP offers 13 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, DCC, Google Pay, Apple Pay, Paypal, American Express acceptance, and multiple processor gateways. These features cater well to international hotels or properties needing flexible, multi-channel payment options.
roommaster Payments provides only one exclusive feature—payment splitting—but covers core hotel payment needs effectively, including deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management, with a focus on automation and integration. If you want a broader array of payment methods, PXP has the edge; if operational workflows matter more, roommaster’s features are sufficient.
Edge: PXP
roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating and recent reviews citing helpful, knowledgeable staff willing to resolve issues quickly. Comments like “they answer my calls and help resolve issues in a timely manner” reinforce the perception of reliable support.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for PXP, but its overall lack of feedback and a 0/5 rating cast doubt on its support quality. For critical payment operations, dependable support is essential, making roommaster Payments the superior choice.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments boasts 56 verified partners, including major property management and hospitality systems like Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric, along with shared integrations with Oracle Hospitality and Canary Technologies. This broad ecosystem supports extensive operational connectivity.
PXP has only 7 verified partners, with some notable integrations like Canary Technologies and Profitroom but far fewer overall. For hotels that rely on multiple integrated systems or plan to expand integrations, roommaster’s larger partner network offers more flexibility.
Edge: roommaster Payments
roommaster Payments has a recent, high NPS score of 8.4/10 based on 20 reviews, with hotel segments like resorts and independent hotels giving positive feedback on support and ease of use. Its recent review activity signals current relevance and satisfaction.
PXP, on the other hand, has a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews, making it impossible to determine user sentiment. Given the importance of user satisfaction for ongoing support, roommaster’s higher recent ratings hold considerable weight.
Edge: roommaster Payments
PXP’s pricing is not explicitly listed, but it appears to be a base fee of $100 with no mention of additional charges. roommaster Payments charges a base price of $300, with no mention of implementation fees or monthly per-room charges.
In absence of detailed PXP pricing, roommaster’s transparent flat fee provides clarity. If cost predictability is essential, roommaster’s straightforward pricing model is preferable.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a proven, support-driven platform, or if you prefer a system with recent reviews and high user satisfaction.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a broad array of payment methods or operates in multiple countries with complex international requirements.
The core difference lies in support and proven reliability. roommaster Payments is a well-supported, recent, and highly rated solution tailored for operational efficiency, whereas PXP’s limited recent feedback, unverified usability, and fewer integrations suggest it’s a less stable choice.
Choose roommaster Payments if your priority is support, ease of use, and recent positive hotel feedback. Its extensive integrations and proven track record make it a safer, more dependable option for most properties.
Opt for PXP only if your hotel needs its specific features like multi-currency settlements and diverse payment options, and you’re prepared to accept higher risk due to limited recent review data.
In summary, roommaster Payments currently stands out as the more reliable, well-supported payment platform, especially for hotels seeking operational stability and support. PXP may appeal to highly international or technologically advanced properties, but its unproven recent standing makes it a riskier option.
Prijzen voor Software voor betalingsverwerking zijn zelden eenvoudig. Dit is wat we weten op basis van de openbare prijsgegevens van elke leverancier. Vraag altijd een offerte op maat aan voor uw accommodatie.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $300/mo |
Volgens de productdatabase van HTR delen PXP en roommaster Payments 12 functies. Dit zijn de belangrijkste verschillen — functies die de een wel heeft en de ander niet.
| Functie |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepteert Apple Pay | ||
| Accepteert Google Pay | ||
| Accepteert Paypal | ||
| Betaling splitsen | ||
| Betalingen in meerdere valuta's | ||
| Dynamische valutaconversie (DCC) | ||
| Terugkerende betalingen |
De belangrijkste verschillen worden getoond. 2 meer functies verschillen tussen deze producten.
Unieke mogelijkheden
Unieke mogelijkheden
Waar de beoordelingen het meest uiteenlopen
Dat hangt af van uw eisen. PXP en roommaster Payments delen veel kern-Payments Processing Software-functies, maar elk heeft unieke mogelijkheden. PXP biedt 7 geverifieerde integratiepartners, terwijl roommaster Payments er 56 biedt. Bekijk de functievergelijking hierboven om te zien waar ze verschillen voordat u overstapt.
Kleine hotels moeten prioriteit geven aan gebruiksgemak en snelle onboarding. roommaster Payments scoort het hoogst op gebruiksgemak met 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Let op transparante prijzen en de mogelijkheid van een proefperiode of demo. Filter beoordelingen op elke productpagina op accommodatiegrootte om te horen van hotels zoals het uwe.
PXP: Nee. roommaster Payments: Nee. Geen van beide producten biedt momenteel een gratis abonnement aan. De meeste Payments Processing Software-leveranciers bieden demo's of proefperiodes aan — vraag er bij beide een aan om te evalueren voordat u zich vastlegt.
De HT Score is een samengestelde ranglijst die 4 criteriagroepen en meer dan tien variabelen meeweegt om hoteliers te helpen hoteltechnologieproducten objectief te vergelijken. PXP heeft een HT Score van 0 en roommaster heeft 0. Zo wordt de score berekend.
| Criteriagroep | Weging | Wat het meet |
|---|---|---|
| Klantbeoordelingen & reviews |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen gebruikers dit product? Beoordelingsscore, reviewvolume, marktaandeel, reviewdiepte, reviewrecentheid, succesverhalen ▾ De zwaarst gewogen factor. Analyseert gemiddelde tevredenheidsbeoordelingen (waarschijnlijkheid om aan te bevelen, gebruiksgemak, ondersteuning, ROI), het totale aantal reviews ten opzichte van categoriegenoten, recentheid van reviews (minimaal 20 reviews in de afgelopen 6 maanden) en marktaandeel over unieke hotelklanten om selectiebias te detecteren. |
| Partnerecosysteem |
|
Hoe hoog beoordelen technologiepartners dit bedrijf? Partneraanbevelingen, integratieaantal, integratiekwaliteit ▾ Evalueert partneraanbevelingen als expertstemmen van vertrouwen, het aantal geverifieerde integraties en ecosysteemkwaliteit — de gemiddelde HT Scores van integratiepartners. Producten met een kwalitatief beter integratie-ecosysteem leveren waarschijnlijker een verbonden technologiearchitectuur. |
| Klantgerichtheid |
|
Hoe klantgericht is deze organisatie? Gecertificeerde ondersteuning, reviewconsistentie, profielvolledigheid ▾ Beoordeelt of het bedrijf HTR Customer Support-certificering heeft verdiend, consistente reviewverzameling in de loop der tijd onderhoudt (een indicator van feedbackgedreven cultuur) en productprofielen compleet houdt met mogelijkheden, schermafbeeldingen, prijzen en functies. |
| Bereik, stabiliteit & middelen |
|
Hoe uitgebreid is het bereik en de middelen van dit bedrijf? Geografisch bereik, stabiliteit, bedrijfsmiddelen, trendscore ▾ Meet wereldwijde aanwezigheid (bediende landen en regio's), aantal jaren in bedrijf als stabiliteitsindicator, teamgrootte als middelenproxy en een trendscore op basis van kopersaanvragen, reviews, partneraanbevelingen en persactiviteit in de afgelopen twaalf maanden. |
Klantbeoordelingen en reviews zijn veruit de belangrijkste factor in het HT Score-algoritme. HTR accepteert geen betaling voor hogere ranglijstposities. Alle reviews zijn geverifieerd — alleen professionals uit de hotelbranche met bevestigde affiliaties kunnen beoordelingen indienen. Bekijk de volledige HT Score-methodologie →
Adviseur productaanbevelingen