The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 400 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
innRoad 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Planet 表现出色 在 功能和特点 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Guest profiles.
在分析了 400 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成,而 Planet 用户则强调 功能和特点, 易于使用, 多物业管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
功能和特点
▾
|
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
+
多物业管理
▾
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
−
支持问题
▾
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
−
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
−
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | #27 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | #15 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | #21 42 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | #21 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | #17 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | #20 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | #10 79 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
Choosing between innRoad by innRoad and protel PMS by Planet requires understanding how each system addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Both products aim to streamline management, boost revenue, and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and user experience. With innRoad boasting more recent reviews and a larger review base, it offers more reliable, up-to-date insights for hoteliers. So, which system genuinely fits your property?
InnRoad and protel PMS both serve to simplify hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. innRoad emphasizes ease of use, robust integration, and direct booking tools, making it appealing for properties focused on increasing direct bookings and operational efficiency. Conversely, protel PMS offers extensive customization, a broad array of integrations, and multi-channel support, catering to larger or more complex hotels. Are you prioritizing quick deployment and user-friendly features, or deep customization and extensive integrations?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-adopt platform with a proven track record of increasing direct bookings, innRoad is the better choice. Its current review count of 238 and recent reviews underscore strong user satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. For hotels seeking a highly customizable, scalable system with vast integration capabilities—especially larger resorts or multi-property groups—protel PMS is more suitable, despite its more complex interface and slower support response times. Are your hotel’s needs more aligned with simplicity or flexibility?
innRoad’s ease of use scores 4.49/5 from user reviews and a support rating of 4.54/5, with many users praising its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding. Its Tape Chart feature, in particular, is lauded for visual clarity and ease of reservation management, making staff onboarding and daily operations smoother. In contrast, protel PMS scores 4.12/5 for ease of use, with some users citing slower response times and complexities in navigation, especially during updates. Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad provides 20 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, online check-in, gift vouchers, and revenue management tools, which streamline front- and back-of-house operations. Protel PMS offers 10 unique features such as multi-lingual support, guest profiles, and SOC2 compliance, focusing on scalable solutions and enhanced security. Shared features total 36, but innRoad’s larger feature set, especially its booking engine and OTA connections, give it a clear edge. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s 4.54/5 customer support rating reflects a responsive, dedicated support team praised for its professionalism and availability. Review quotes highlight prompt issue resolution and effective communication, critical for smooth operations. Meanwhile, protel PMS scores 3.95/5, with users noting support delays and less consistent responsiveness, particularly after Planet’s acquisition. Given recent reviews and higher satisfaction scores, innRoad’s support is the stronger choice. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including key systems like QuickBooks, Airbnb, and channel managers, offering solid connectivity for smaller to mid-sized properties. Protel PMS boasts 195 verified integrations, featuring over 1,200 partner systems, including advanced revenue management, CRM, and BI tools, ideal for larger, more complex operations. The sheer volume of integrations favors protel for extensive connectivity, but innRoad’s targeted options are more manageable for many hoteliers. Edge: protel PMS.
innRoad’s reviews show a 4.7/5 overall rating, with 89% Likelihood to Recommend and recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness and support quality. Its customers—mainly independent and boutique hotels—highlight increased bookings and revenue. Conversely, protel PMS scores 4.11/5, with reviews mostly from larger hotels, citing good functionality but issues with support and system bugs. Considering recent data, innRoad consistently receives higher ratings across key categories. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a flat monthly fee of $300, with no additional hidden costs, making it transparent and predictable. protel PMS’s base price starts at $500 per month, with no trial or freemium options, which may be a barrier for smaller properties. The higher initial investment for protel reflects its broader feature set and enterprise focus. Does your hotel prefer a straightforward, lower-cost solution or a premium system with extensive capabilities?
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive multi-property management, complex rate customization, or on-premise solutions requiring high security.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a straightforward, easy-to-use system, or if quick support response is crucial to your operation.
The core difference lies in target complexity: innRoad offers a user-friendly platform with a strong focus on increasing direct bookings and simplifying daily tasks. Its higher review count and recent feedback demonstrate consistent satisfaction, especially with onboarding and support.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick deployment, and support, innRoad is the better option, with a proven track record of boosting revenue in boutique and independent sectors. However, if your property is larger, with multiple locations and complex needs, protel’s extensive integrations, customization options, and scalability make it more suitable—despite its steeper learning curve and support challenges.
Choosing the right system hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational priorities. For most small to mid-sized hotels focused on simplicity and revenue growth, innRoad stands out as the smarter choice. Larger properties with complex workflows should consider protel but be prepared for longer onboarding and support times.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 protel PMS (by Planet) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。protel PMS (by Planet):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Planet 的为 33。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问