HOIST GROUP - HotSoft vs. Stayntouch:
Welke past bij u?

The Decision

When choosing a property management system (PMS), your team needs a solution that simplifies operations, elevates guest experiences, and integrates smoothly with existing systems. Both HotSoft by HOIST GROUP and Stayntouch aim to meet these needs, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. HotSoft has a long history but lacks recent reviews or a strong modern reputation, while Stayntouch boasts a high user rating and active, recent reviews, making it the clearer choice for hotel operators today.

Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize comprehensive features, ease of use, or global reach. HotSoft’s limited recent feedback makes it difficult to assess ongoing support and innovation, while Stayntouch’s proven track record and extensive integrations speak to its relevance in the current market. Are you ready to prioritize a platform with active, recent user validation?

Is HotSoft or Stayntouch Better for Hotels?

Both HotSoft and Stayntouch intend to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and market alignment differ. HotSoft is a traditional on-premise PMS that offers reservation, billing, and housekeeping functions but lacks recent reviews or a clear roadmap for innovation. Conversely, Stayntouch is a cloud-based system lauded for its mobile friendliness, real-time updates, and extensive third-party integrations, all supported by over 300 recent reviews.

HotSoft’s lack of recent feedback and zero verified reviews in the last six months make it difficult to gauge ongoing support, updates, or user satisfaction. Meanwhile, Stayntouch’s 26 recent reviews and a 94% likelihood of recommendation highlight its active user base and ongoing improvements. Given the rapid evolution of hospitality technology, would you prefer a vendor actively validated by recent user experiences?

Stayntouch vs HotSoft: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a modern, scalable platform with robust integrations, focus on guest experience, and easy remote management, Stayntouch is the better fit. Its cloud-based architecture, extensive third-party partner network, and high user satisfaction score make it suitable for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.

If your hotel operates in a more static environment with limited need for mobility or multi-system integration, and you prefer a traditional on-premise setup, HotSoft might meet your needs — but remember, it has no recent reviews to confirm current performance. For most hotels today prioritizing flexibility and tech-forward features, Stayntouch is the clear winner.

Is HotSoft or Stayntouch Easier to Use?

Stayntouch scores a 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and mobile capabilities. Users highlight how quickly staff can be trained and adopt the system, with one review calling it “the most intuitive platform on the market.”

HotSoft, on the other hand, has no recent user ratings or reviews, leaving its ease of use unverified. Historically, traditional PMSs tend to have a steeper learning curve, especially without ongoing updates or user feedback to improve usability.

Edge: Stayntouch.

Which Has Better Features: HotSoft or Stayntouch?

Stayntouch offers a comprehensive suite with 49 unique features, including revenue management, online check-in, guest profiles, digital registration, shift planning, and integrated payment terminals. Its mobile app, automated night audits, and multi-property management set it apart, especially for hotels seeking modern, flexible tools.

HotSoft provides core reservation, billing, and housekeeping functionalities but lacks the advanced features and integrations available in Stayntouch. It has no unique features listed, indicating a more limited scope.

Edge: Stayntouch.

Which Has Better Customer Support: HotSoft or Stayntouch?

Stayntouch’s recent reviews rate its support at 4.68/5, with users praising the onboarding process, friendly staff, and quick resolution times. One hotel operator describes their support as “excellent, friendly, and very thorough,” emphasizing the system’s ease of implementation.

HotSoft’s lack of recent reviews means support quality cannot be reliably assessed today. Historically, traditional vendors often have limited support channels or slower response times, especially without active user feedback confirming current service levels.

Edge: Stayntouch.

Which Has More Integrations: HotSoft or Stayntouch?

Stayntouch boasts 188 verified third-party integrations, including prominent partners like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and hotel investor apps. This extensive network enables seamless connection with revenue management, channel managers, and contactless check-in solutions.

HotSoft offers no verified integrations, which limits its connectivity and scalability in a modern hotel environment. For hotels relying on diverse systems, this makes Stayntouch the more adaptable and future-proof choice.

Edge: Stayntouch.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: HotSoft or Stayntouch?

Stayntouch enjoys a 4.56/5 overall rating based on 317 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months confirms high satisfaction. Hotels across segments, from boutique to branded properties, praise its usability, support, and feature set.

In contrast, HotSoft has no recent reviews or current rating data, indicating a lack of active user feedback or satisfaction measurement. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to gauge current performance or user happiness.

Edge: Stayntouch.

How Much Do HotSoft and Stayntouch Cost?

HotSoft’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be a traditional on-premise solution with custom quotes. Stayntouch’s base price starts at $800 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options.

Given the cloud-based subscription model of Stayntouch, your hotel can expect predictable monthly costs, making budgeting easier. HotSoft’s pricing remains opaque, which might hinder decision-making for budget-conscious hotels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use HotSoft?

• Hotels that operate primarily with traditional systems and prefer on-premise solutions.
• Properties with minimal need for mobility or third-party integrations.
• Teams that prioritize straightforward reservation and billing functions.
• Hotels with limited IT support or infrastructure to manage complex cloud systems.

Not ideal if:

• You require mobile access and contactless check-in.
• You want frequent feature updates and modern automation.
• Your hotel is part of a growing chain or seeks multi-property management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Stayntouch?

• Hotels seeking a flexible, cloud-based PMS that scales with growth.
• Properties emphasizing mobile check-in/out and contactless solutions.
• Multi-property chains requiring centralized management.
• Hotels wanting extensive third-party integrations and real-time data access.
• Teams that value quick onboarding and ongoing support.

Not ideal if:

• You operate in environments with unreliable internet, limiting cloud access.
• You prefer on-premise software for security or compliance reasons.
• Your property is very small and doesn’t need advanced features.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

HotSoft offers a traditional route for properties with straightforward needs but lacks recent validation or modern features. Stayntouch, with its recent reviews, extensive integrations, and mobile-first approach, caters to hotels aiming for operational agility and growth.

If your hotel prioritizes staying current with technology, improving guest experiences, and scaling efficiently, Stayntouch is the clear choice. HotSoft may suit very limited environments or legacy setups, but it’s less future-proof in today’s fast-evolving hospitality landscape.

For most hoteliers, the active, recent user validation and feature-rich platform make Stayntouch the more reliable and scalable option. Choosing Stayntouch means investing in a system that has proven its value with real-world hotels actively deploying and supporting it today.