The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 15 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
AeroGuest se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como PMS Integration.
Hoteza se destaca em ROI and onboarding , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Lobby Kiosk.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 15 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 13 | 2 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Check-in sem contato para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) | #15 1 avaliacoes | #20 0 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #8 9 avaliacoes | #11 2 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | #17 1 avaliacoes | #22 0 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #11 2 avaliacoes | #9 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 10 avaliacoes | #12 2 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #11 5 avaliacoes | #12 1 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | #19 1 avaliacoes | #16 0 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | #16 0 avaliacoes | #17 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #12 0 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #8 12 avaliacoes | #11 1 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #8 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | #8 1 avaliacoes | #6 0 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right contactless check-in system for your hotel hinges on understanding each product’s strengths and limitations. AeroGuest Check-in by AeroGuest and Hoteza Check-In by Hoteza both aim to streamline arrivals, reduce queues, and enhance guest experiences, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, segment, and technological needs.
AeroGuest boasts broader adoption, more recent reviews, and a higher overall rating, making it a compelling choice if your priority is proven reliability and extensive integrations. Hoteza, despite fewer reviews, offers a highly rated, easy-to-use platform with strong support and customization options. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals?
Both AeroGuest and Hoteza focus on contactless check-in, reducing manual front-desk interactions and providing a smoother arrival experience. AeroGuest’s platform emphasizes automation with integrations to over 14 PMS systems, allowing full pre-arrival check-in and room selection, which is ideal for hotels seeking high levels of operational automation. Conversely, Hoteza’s solution is web-based and app-free, designed for quick, straightforward implementation, often favored by smaller or mid-sized hotels needing a simple, reliable solution.
While AeroGuest has a broader market footprint, including regions like North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, Hoteza maintains a strong presence mainly in North America, South America, and Europe. Both products aim to reduce queues and manual input, but AeroGuest’s more extensive integration ecosystem and broader geographic reach make it more adaptable for large or international hotels. Do you prioritize a globally proven solution or a straightforward, easy-to-deploy system?
If your hotel operates in a large market or requires integration with multiple PMS and third-party systems, AeroGuest is the better fit. Its 26 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SiteMinder, provide seamless integration, making it ideal if automation and data flow are critical to your operations. AeroGuest’s high review count (11 reviews in the last six months) and 5/5 overall rating reflect proven customer satisfaction.
If your hotel is smaller, values simplicity, or wants a solution with a quick setup and high ease of use, Hoteza should be your choice. With only 2 recent reviews but a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use rating and support, Hoteza appeals to hotels prioritizing straightforward implementation and dedicated support. Its cloud-based, app-free approach minimizes tech complexity, suitable for properties that prefer minimal integration efforts.
In summary, choose AeroGuest if you need advanced automation and extensive integrations; opt for Hoteza if you prefer simplicity and direct support. Your hotel’s size and technological infrastructure should guide this decision.
AeroGuest scores 4.77/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its seamless, mobile-first approach that lets guests check in, select rooms, and pay before arrival. Its onboarding process averages 4.6/5, and users highlight the platform’s intuitive nature, though some note room for improved chat features outside the backend.
Hoteza, rated slightly higher at 5/5, is praised for its straightforward, web-based interface, which requires no app download. Its onboarding is rated perfect, with users finding it quick to teach staff and guests. Given Hoteza’s focus on simplicity and quick setup, it’s favored for properties that want minimal training and hassle.
Edge: Hoteza.
Both platforms share 18 core features, such as digital check-in, payment processing, and multilingual support. AeroGuest offers additional capabilities like PMS integration, a feature only it possesses, allowing it to connect seamlessly with existing property systems.
Hoteza provides unique features like Lobby Kiosk and Automatic Translations, which are absent in AeroGuest. Its customizable, multilingual interface and digital signature options enhance international guest handling. Overall, AeroGuest’s extensive integrations and feature set make it more comprehensive for large properties, while Hoteza’s simplicity and specialized features suit smaller hotels.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s support team scores 4.77/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, reliable assistance and smooth onboarding. Customers describe AeroGuest support as "responsive and helpful," though some suggest more proactive communication on emerging trends.
Hoteza’s support is rated perfect at 5/5, with reviews praising its promptness and personalized attention. Hotel staff appreciate the straightforward, effective support that helps them implement the platform quickly, especially for international properties with multilingual needs.
Edge: Hoteza.
AeroGuest boasts 26 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, and integrations with channel managers and mobile access systems. Shared integrations include Stayntouch, Mews, and Vingcard, but AeroGuest’s broader partner list indicates greater flexibility for complex setups.
Hoteza offers 20 verified partners, including hotelkit, Shiji Group, and Amadeus, focusing more on hospitality-specific solutions but with fewer total integrations. If extensive third-party connectivity is vital, AeroGuest’s larger partner ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s 11 recent reviews and overall 5/5 rating underscore its strong customer satisfaction, especially among city center and boutique hotels. Reviewers appreciate its automation, ease of use, and integration capabilities, with one noting, “AeroGuest makes the check-in process effortless, reducing queues and administrative work.”
Hoteza’s limited reviews (2 recent) and perfect 5/5 ratings reflect a highly favorable perception among early adopters, mainly in North America and Europe. Its simplicity and dedicated support earn praise, though the smaller sample size suggests less widespread validation.
Given the larger review base and higher recent activity, AeroGuest holds the edge.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest charges a base fee of $400, with no mention of additional implementation, monthly, or per-room fees. Its straightforward pricing appeals to hotels seeking predictable costs without extra charges.
Hoteza’s base price is $600, also without additional charges, but often requires a longer-term commitment for full deployment. While slightly more expensive, Hoteza’s pricing reflects its comprehensive features and support.
If budget is a primary concern, AeroGuest’s lower price point offers more value for similar core functionality. However, consider whether additional features justify the extra cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
AeroGuest and Hoteza both aim to simplify contactless check-in, but AeroGuest’s extensive integrations, broader global presence, and larger review base give it a decisive advantage. Its focus on automation and scalability makes it suitable for larger, complex hotels.
Choose AeroGuest if your goal is high-level automation, proven performance, and extensive system connectivity. Its broad market reach and recent high ratings assure reliability and ongoing support.
Opt for Hoteza if your hotel is smaller, values ease of use, quick setup, and personalized support. Its app-free design and simplicity make it ideal for properties seeking to enhance guest experiences without heavy tech investments.
In conclusion, AeroGuest is the more proven, feature-rich platform for most large or international hotels. Hoteza is a strong contender for properties valuing simplicity, quick deployment, and personalized support.
Note: This comparison is based solely on available reviews, feature lists, and pricing data. Your specific needs and technical environment will ultimately determine the best fit.
Os precos de Check-in sem contato raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, AeroGuest Check-in e Hoteza Check-In compartilham 18 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Integração PMS | ||
| Quiosque do saguão | ||
| Traduções Automáticas |
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. AeroGuest Check-in e Hoteza Check-In compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Contactless Check-in, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. AeroGuest Check-in oferece 26 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Hoteza Check-In oferece 20. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Hoteza Check-In lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
AeroGuest Check-in: Nao. Hoteza Check-In: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Contactless Check-in oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. AeroGuest tem um HT Score de 0 e Hoteza tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.