The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 21 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Bookwize se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 21 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 21 | 0 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #38 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #37 3 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #23 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo | #46 1 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #39 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada | #36 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #17 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico | #26 1 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is essential for your hotel’s revenue and guest experience. Both ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. and Bookwize aim to streamline online reservations, but their approach, features, and market presence differ significantly. Your decision should hinge on which platform aligns best with your property’s size, technical needs, and growth ambitions.
ASI WebRes is the more established option, with extensive reviews, recent updates, and a comprehensive feature set. Bookwize, although newer, offers a simple, straightforward interface but lacks the depth and user feedback that ASI provides. Which platform will help your hotel thrive?
ASI WebRes addresses hotels seeking a full-featured booking engine integrated into a broader property management system (PMS). It offers extensive capabilities like multi-channel distribution, rate plan comparisons, and detailed reporting, making it suitable for properties that need a versatile system. Bookwize, on the other hand, is focused solely on online bookings, catering to smaller hotels that want a straightforward, no-fuss interface.
While ASI WebRes boasts 20 reviews in the last six months and a high customer satisfaction rating, Bookwize has no recent reviews, making it hard to assess its current performance or reliability. This review activity favors ASI’s reliability and ongoing support, critical factors for your decision. Do you need a comprehensive hotel management solution or a simple booking interface?
If your hotel needs a robust, integrated PMS with a powerful booking engine, go with ASI WebRes. Its 27 unique features, including Google Hotel Ads, multi-lingual support, and channel management, make it ideal for multi-property portfolios or hotels aiming to scale.
If your primary focus is a standalone, easy-to-implement booking tool without complex integration needs, Bookwize might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or feature details available, ASI’s proven track record and extensive integration options make it the more reliable choice for most hotels.
Based on recent reviews, ASI WebRes scores a near-perfect 4.95 out of 5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive dashboard, simple workflows, and quick onboarding process. Reviewers also highlight the clarity of setup and support staff’s professionalism, making staff adoption straightforward.
In contrast, Bookwize offers no publicly available user ratings or recent feedback, leaving its usability unverified. The lack of review data makes it difficult to assess whether its interface is as user-friendly as ASI’s.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes provides 27 distinct features, including mobile responsiveness, special offers, Tripadvisor and Google Hotel Ads integrations, multi-lingual support, rate plan comparisons, flexible rates, and advanced analytics. These tools enable your hotel to tailor the guest booking experience and optimize revenue management.
Bookwize’s feature set remains undisclosed, with no detailed list or recent updates available. The absence of documented features or reviews suggests it may lack the breadth and depth ASI offers.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Customer support is a strong point for ASI WebRes, with a 4.85 out of 5 rating and recent reviews emphasizing prompt, knowledgeable, and courteous assistance. Users report seamless onboarding and quick resolution of technical issues, which is vital for smooth operations.
Bookwize’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews exist to gauge its customer service quality. The lack of feedback makes it risky compared to ASI’s proven support structure.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes integrates with 19 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, and offers integrations with TripAdvisor, Google Hotel Ads, and social media platforms. These integrations help streamline operations and expand your marketing reach.
Bookwize has no publicly available integrations or verified partner list, limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For properties relying on diverse third-party tools, ASI’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 reviews in the last six months, ASI WebRes has an overall NPS score of 9.85/10 and a 99% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Hotels of all segments, especially independent and small chain properties, appreciate its ease of use and support.
Bookwize has no recent reviews or ratings, so its user satisfaction remains unknown. Relying on current feedback, ASI’s reputation is clearly superior.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed, which is common in the hospitality software industry. Typically, ASI WebRes’s comprehensive features may imply a higher investment, but its value is reflected in the positive reviews and support.
Since Bookwize provides no pricing or trial information, it’s difficult to compare costs directly. Your decision should consider the overall value and support quality, which favor ASI WebRes.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or only needs a basic booking engine, as the full feature set may be more than you require.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a comprehensive PMS or advanced analytics, as Bookwize’s features are limited or unverified.
ASI WebRes is a well-rounded booking engine that stands apart thanks to its extensive features, integration options, and proven customer support. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking a trusted, scalable solution.
Bookwize may appeal to very small properties or those with limited needs, but the lack of recent reviews and detailed features makes it a riskier option. If your hotel aims for growth, efficiency, and a seamless online booking experience, ASI WebRes is the clear winner.
In summary, if you want a mature, feature-rich platform with ongoing support and verified integrations, go with ASI WebRes. If simplicity and minimal features are your priority, you might consider Bookwize—but proceed with caution.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|---|
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ASI WebRes e Bookwize Booking Engine Interface compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ofertas e descontos especiais | ||
| Otimizado para dispositivos móveis/responsivo | ||
| Reserva de plano multi-quarto e multi-tarifa | ||
| Reservas de anúncios de hotéis do Google | ||
| Reservas do Tripadvisor | ||
| Substituições de Sala |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 15 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ASI WebRes e Bookwize Booking Engine Interface compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ASI WebRes oferece 19 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Bookwize Booking Engine Interface oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ASI WebRes lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ASI WebRes: Nao. Bookwize Booking Engine Interface: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) tem um HT Score de 0 e Bookwize tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.