The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 21 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Getaroom se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 21 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 21 | 0 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #38 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #37 3 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #23 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo | #46 1 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #39 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada | #36 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #17 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico | #26 1 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s success. Both ASI WebRes and Getaroom aim to streamline reservations, but they serve distinctly different needs. ASI WebRes, integrated within a comprehensive property management system, offers deep operational control and extensive features. Conversely, Getaroom is a standalone booking platform focused on consumer experience and wide inventory access. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
ASI WebRes is part of the larger ASI Property Management System, designed to help independent hotels, resorts, and multi-property portfolios manage reservations, channels, and operations in one platform. It boasts a 4.95/5 ease-of-use rating based on 20 recent reviews, with glowing comments about its straightforward workflows and quick support, making daily management smoother.
Getaroom, with zero reviews and a lack of recent data, currently has no proven user feedback to support its effectiveness. Its core strength appears to be offering a broad inventory of hotel rooms globally and a simplified booking interface, but without recent reviews, its actual usability and reliability remain uncertain.
This leaves you to ask: which platform truly meets your operational needs and guest experience expectations?
If your hotel needs a full hotel management system that consolidates reservations, front desk, housekeeping, billing, and distribution, ASI WebRes is the clear choice. Its 20 recent reviews confirm high satisfaction, especially with its ease of use and support, making it ideal for independent properties or multi-property portfolios seeking operational control.
On the other hand, if your primary goal is online guest acquisition with a wide inventory and minimal integration complexity, Getaroom’s extensive hotel listings and user-focused booking experience might appeal—though the lack of recent reviews makes it a risky choice for reliability right now.
Thus, for hotels prioritizing operational integration and proven customer satisfaction, ASI WebRes stands out. For those focusing on broad inventory access and a consumer-facing booking platform, Getaroom could be considered, but with caution.
ASI WebRes offers a highly rated 4.95/5 ease of use based on 20 recent reviews, with owners praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and support responsiveness. Users highlight how it simplifies daily operations, from reservations to housekeeping, with very few complaints.
Getaroom, with no available recent reviews, provides no clear data on user experience or ease of use. Its interface is described as streamlined in marketing materials, but without recent, verified feedback, its usability remains unconfirmed.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes packs in 27 features exclusive to it, including mobile optimization, special offers, multi-channel booking, Google and Tripadvisor integrations, multi-lingual support, flexible rates, and social media integration. These features cater to operational complexity and direct booking optimization, giving it a significant advantage.
Getaroom offers no documented features beyond basic booking functions, lacking the extensive operational and marketing tools that ASI WebRes provides. Its feature set appears minimal and less suited for comprehensive hotel management.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Based on recent reviews, ASI WebRes scores a 4.85/5 for customer support, with users describing the team as professional, courteous, and quick to resolve issues. One review states, "Technical issues are resolved immediately, support staff are knowledgeable and friendly."
Getaroom’s customer support information is limited, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or quality. Its support reputation remains unverified, making ASI WebRes the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes connects with 19 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Duetto, and integrates with social, analytics, and booking platforms. This extensive partner network enhances its flexibility for diverse hotel needs.
Getaroom offers a single verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, limiting its integration options. Without broader connectivity, it may not fit hotels requiring multi-channel or third-party system integrations.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews and a 4.95/5 ease-of-use score, ASI WebRes's user base of independent and multi-property hotels consistently praises its simplicity and support. Hotels in North America, South America, Asia Pacific, and other regions report high satisfaction levels.
Getaroom has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences at this time.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable, suggesting they may require custom quotes based on property size and features. ASI WebRes’s value is reflected in its feature set and support quality, while Getaroom’s lack of transparency makes cost comparisons difficult.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, standalone booking platform without operational management features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs deep operational controls or proven support, especially given the lack of recent reviews.
ASI WebRes is a comprehensive hotel management and booking platform bolstered by a strong recent review base, high customer ratings, and extensive features. Its ability to unify reservations, distribution, billing, and guest management makes it suitable for independent hotels and multi-property groups aiming for operational efficiency.
Getaroom, despite its broad inventory and consumer-facing focus, currently lacks recent user feedback and detailed features, making it a less reliable choice right now. Its potential is evident, but without verified reviews, your hotel risks investing in unproven technology.
In summary, if your priority is a trusted, feature-rich booking engine integrated within a broader PMS, ASI WebRes is the clear leader. For hotels primarily seeking a straightforward, inventory-heavy booking platform and willing to accept the risk of limited recent validation, Getaroom might be considered—but caution is advised.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Getaroom |
|---|
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ASI WebRes e Getaroom compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Getaroom |
|---|---|---|
| Ofertas e descontos especiais | ||
| Otimizado para dispositivos móveis/responsivo | ||
| Reserva de plano multi-quarto e multi-tarifa | ||
| Reservas de anúncios de hotéis do Google | ||
| Reservas do Tripadvisor | ||
| Substituições de Sala |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 15 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ASI WebRes e Getaroom compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ASI WebRes oferece 19 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Getaroom oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ASI WebRes lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ASI WebRes: Nao. Getaroom: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) tem um HT Score de 0 e Getaroom tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.