The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 21 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Orbitz se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 21 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 21 | 0 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
Orbitz |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #38 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #37 3 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #23 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
Orbitz |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo | #46 1 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #39 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada | #36 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
Orbitz |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #17 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico | #26 1 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and Orbitz as your hotel’s booking engine hinges on your specific operational needs and strategic goals. ASI WebRes is a dedicated hotel booking platform integrated within a broader property management system, while Orbitz is a travel marketplace that consolidates bookings across multiple travel services. Both aim to streamline reservations, but they serve different purposes and hotel profiles. Which aligns better with your hotel's growth trajectory?
Based on recent reviews and user feedback, ASI WebRes emerges as the more reliable and feature-rich solution for hoteliers. With 20 current reviews in the last six months and a high customer satisfaction score, it outperforms Orbitz, which has no recent reviews or verified user ratings. If you prioritize a proven, hotel-focused booking engine, ASI is the clear choice.
Both ASI WebRes and Orbitz provide online reservation capabilities, but their core functions differ significantly. ASI WebRes acts as a dedicated booking engine integrated into a property management system, offering tailored features for hotel operations, including rate management and real-time availability synchronization. Orbitz, on the other hand, is a broad travel marketplace that aggregates hotel listings alongside flights and car rentals, primarily targeting consumers rather than hotel operators. Do you need a booking engine designed to directly drive bookings on your site, or a marketplace to enhance visibility?
ASI WebRes’s strength lies in its deep integration with PMS, real-time channel management, and extensive hotel-specific features. Orbitz’s advantage is its wide reach for consumers, but it lacks direct hotel management functionalities. Given the recent, detailed reviews of ASI’s ease of use, support, and feature set, it’s evident that ASI WebRes is more suited for hotel teams seeking operational control. Would you prefer a system that enhances your direct booking channel or a marketplace for wider exposure?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive booking engine that integrates seamlessly with your property management system, ASI WebRes is the better fit. Its 20 recent reviews with an average rating of 4.95/5 underscore its stability, ease of use, and customer support, making it ideal for independent hotels, motels, resorts, and multi-property portfolios seeking efficiency. Conversely, Orbitz might appeal if you're looking for a platform to increase hotel visibility on a consumer-oriented travel marketplace, but its lack of recent reviews and user ratings makes its effectiveness uncertain.
Hotels that aim to optimize direct bookings, streamline operations, and benefit from extensive hotel-specific features should prioritize ASI WebRes. Resorts, boutique hotels, and multi-property groups needing real-time reservation management will find it indispensable. Orbitz is less suitable for hotel operators focused on direct management but could suit smaller properties wanting broader exposure if it were actively supported and reviewed. Which outcome aligns with your growth and operational needs?
Ease of use is critical for rapid staff adoption and minimal training time. ASI WebRes has a high ease of use rating of 4.95/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, straightforward workflows, and quick onboarding process. Support staff are lauded for their professionalism, with responses described as “prompt,” and reports as “clear and concise.”
Orbitz, however, receives no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its user experience or onboarding process directly. Industry feedback indicates Orbitz is a broad marketplace, which typically involves a more consumer-oriented interface not tailored for hotel staff. Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes offers 27 distinct features, many tailored specifically for hotel operations, such as multi-lingual support, rate plan comparisons, special offers, and integration with TripAdvisor and Google Hotel Ads. It also features customizable add-ons, flexible rates, multi-currency support, and POS integrations. These features support operational flexibility and marketing efforts.
Orbitz, by contrast, has no unique or hotel-centric features listed, functioning primarily as a booking aggregator. The lack of detailed feature offerings and recent reviews suggests it’s not specialized for hotel management. For hotels seeking advanced reservation, rate management, and guest engagement tools, ASI WebRes’s feature set is clearly superior. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Customer support ratings are a strong point for ASI WebRes, with a score of 4.85/5 based on recent reviews. Users describe the support team as “knowledgeable,” “courteous,” and “responsive,” with issues resolved promptly, contributing to smooth daily operations. The onboarding process is rated 4.8/5, highlighting ease of implementation.
Orbitz offers no recent reviews or verified feedback, leaving its support effectiveness unverified. As a dedicated hotel booking platform, ASI WebRes’s support is a key differentiator, especially for properties needing reliable assistance. Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes integrates with 19 verified partners, including site management systems like SiteMinder, channel managers, and OTAs like Expedia and Booking.com. It also supports social media booking and Google Analytics tracking, enabling comprehensive online presence management.
Orbitz has no listed integrations or partner connections, limiting its utility as a hotel management tool. Its role as a booking marketplace does not inherently include direct integration capabilities with property systems. For hotel teams seeking seamless operational integration and channel management, ASI WebRes is the clear choice. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Recent reviews overwhelmingly favor ASI WebRes, with a 99% likelihood to recommend and a far higher review count (20 reviews in the last six months). Hoteliers praise its user-friendliness, detailed reports, and support, especially in the independent hotel segment.
Orbitz has no recent reviews or ratings from hotel operators, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction. As a dedicated booking engine, ASI WebRes’s high approval rate confirms its value for properties seeking operational efficiency. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly disclosed, with no trial options available. ASI WebRes typically involves a licensing or subscription fee integrated into the broader property management system, while Orbitz, functioning as a marketplace, usually earns commissions from bookings.
Since specific prices are unavailable, your decision should consider the value of features, support, and integrations offered by ASI WebRes, which has demonstrated a strong return on investment through positive reviews. Cost comparison favors the platform with proven performance and support, which is ASI WebRes.
The core difference is that ASI WebRes is a dedicated hotel booking engine integrated into a property management system, whereas Orbitz functions as a broad travel marketplace. ASI WebRes’s recent, high-rated reviews and extensive feature set make it the more reliable choice for hotel operators.
If your hotel needs a full-featured, hotel-specific reservation solution that supports operational efficiency, direct bookings, and integrations, choose ASI WebRes. Its proven track record, recent customer support, and detailed reviews make it the superior option.
Choose Orbitz only if your strategy is to leverage a travel marketplace for broader exposure, not direct management. Its lack of recent reviews and hotel-centric features makes it unsuitable for hotels prioritizing operational control and direct bookings.
In summary, for most hotel operators, ASI WebRes offers a clearer, more dependable path forward.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
Orbitz |
|---|
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ASI WebRes e Orbitz compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
Orbitz |
|---|---|---|
| Ofertas e descontos especiais | ||
| Otimizado para dispositivos móveis/responsivo | ||
| Reserva de plano multi-quarto e multi-tarifa | ||
| Reservas de anúncios de hotéis do Google | ||
| Reservas do Tripadvisor | ||
| Substituições de Sala |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 15 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ASI WebRes e Orbitz compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ASI WebRes oferece 19 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Orbitz oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ASI WebRes lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ASI WebRes: Nao. Orbitz: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) tem um HT Score de 0 e Orbitz tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.