The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 34 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Tripadvisor Bookings and Flat, floating and discounted rates.
STAAH se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Automated reporting.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 34 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 21 | 13 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #38 2 avaliacoes | #35 4 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #37 3 avaliacoes | #36 5 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #37 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #23 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #45 1 avaliacoes | #36 8 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #46 1 avaliacoes | #33 9 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #39 2 avaliacoes | #34 4 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | #36 1 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #17 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #26 1 avaliacoes | #14 11 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical for your hotel's online reservations, guest experience, and revenue management. Both ASI WebRes and STAAH Booking Engine aim to streamline this process, but they diverge significantly in scale, user feedback, and features. Your decision hinges on which product aligns better with your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
ASI WebRes, integrated within Anand Systems Inc.'s broader PMS, offers a unified platform with a strong focus on operational efficiency and multi-property management. Meanwhile, STAAH's Booking Engine emphasizes direct bookings, dynamic pricing, and integrations, backed by a larger and more recent review base. Are you ready to pick the platform that best matches your needs?
Both products serve the core purpose of increasing online reservations, but they approach it differently. ASI WebRes is part of a comprehensive hotel management system, ideal for properties seeking an all-in-one platform that covers reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and reporting. Its primary strength is its deep integration with the broader ASI PMS, which simplifies multi-property management and internal operations.
STAAH Booking Engine specializes in driving direct bookings from your website and reducing OTA commissions. It focuses heavily on conversion tools like smart pricing, analytics, and add-ons like group bookings and Day Use Rooms, which appeal to properties aiming to maximize revenue from online channels. Do these differences impact your choice based on hotel size or operational complexity?
ASI WebRes tends to favor larger or multi-property hotels that need an integrated solution for operations and distribution, while STAAH suits small to medium-sized hotels prioritizing direct bookings and revenue optimization. Are you looking for a comprehensive management system or a dedicated booking engine to boost online sales?
If your hotel needs a full management system that centralizes reservations, front desk, housekeeping, billing, and reporting, go with ASI WebRes. Its 20 reviews, mostly from users in the last six months, highlight its ease of use (4.95/5), strong support (4.85/5), and high recommendation rates (99%).
If your focus is on increasing direct bookings, reducing OTA costs, and leveraging detailed analytics, STAAH is the better pick. Its 13 recent reviews give it a stellar overall rating of 4.81/5, with praise for support (4.88/5) and ease of setup.
For properties wanting an all-in-one hotel management platform, ASI WebRes fits best. For those seeking a dedicated, high-rated booking engine to maximize online revenue, STAAH leads the choice.
Based on current reviews, ASI WebRes scores 4.95/5 on ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward workflows. Users note that onboarding is smooth, and staff adoption is typically seamless, citing quick support and clear report layouts.
STAAH's booking engine rates slightly lower at 4.69/5 but still receives high marks for user-friendliness. Reviewers highlight its simple setup, helpful customer service, and easy inventory management, although some suggest the UI could be improved.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes offers 20 shared features plus 7 unique features such as Tripadvisor Bookings, Facebook integration, social media bookings, wedding & corporate modules, ADA compliance, and detailed Google Analytics tracking. This suite provides a comprehensive management and distribution toolkit.
STAAH provides 20 shared features with 5 exclusive ones, including a price comparison widget, Google tracking, automated reporting, Stripe, and PayPal integrations. Its focus is on dynamic pricing, analytics, and direct booking enhancements.
Edge: ASI WebRes, due to its broader feature set tailored for operational management.
Reviewers consistently praise both products’ support teams. ASI WebRes support scores 4.85/5, with comments on fast, knowledgeable support that resolves issues promptly. Users find the onboarding process straightforward and the support team highly responsive.
STAAH's customer support slightly outperforms with a score of 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing friendly, helpful, and professional service. Many mention that support is quick and supports ongoing system upgrades smoothly.
Edge: STAAH, owing to slightly higher recent review scores and emphasis on customer care.
STAAH boasts 54 verified partners, nearly triple ASI's 19 integrations, including popular systems like BookLogic, Preno, GuestTraction, and Stayntouch. Shared integrations include major vendors like Cendyn, RoomPriceGenie, and Triptease.
ASI, however, offers critical integrations within its ecosystem, notably its own PMS, channel manager, and booking engine, which are tightly coupled. For properties needing extensive third-party connections, STAAH’s broader partner network provides more options.
Edge: STAAH.
While ASI WebRes has 20 reviews, most are older, with recent feedback not available. Its overall rating is 0/5—indicating no current recent ratings, which limits confidence.
STAAH, with 13 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.81/5, enjoys consistent praise from a variety of hotel segments, including resorts, boutique, and city hotels. Reviewers appreciate its ease of setup, helpful support, and ability to reduce booking issues.
Edge: STAAH.
Pricing details for ASI WebRes are not publicly available, but it appears to be part of a larger PMS package, likely bundled and customized per property. It does not offer a freemium or trial, suggesting a tailored quote is required.
STAAH’s pricing is also not published explicitly but is based on a subscription model without a free trial. Given its focus on direct bookings and integrations, costs are likely variable depending on features and property size.
Both products typically require direct contact for quotes; no transparent pricing information is available.
ASI WebRes is suited for properties aiming for operational efficiency and scalability, especially with complex internal workflows.
STAAH is ideal for properties focused on revenue growth through online channels and direct customer engagement.
ASI WebRes offers a broad, integrated hotel management system with reservation, housekeeping, billing, and distribution all in one place. Its strengths lie in operational control, multi-property management, and detailed analytics, making it ideal for large or multi-property hotels.
STAAH excels at driving direct bookings, reducing OTA costs, and providing a highly-rated, flexible booking engine. Its extensive integrations, analytics, and support network make it a strong choice for properties emphasizing online sales and revenue optimization.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one management platform, ASI WebRes is the clear choice. For properties primarily looking to boost online bookings and reduce commissions, STAAH is the superior option.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|---|
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ASI WebRes e STAAH Booking Engine compartilham 20 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Comparação de preços | ||
| Compatível com ADA | ||
| Integração de mídia social/reservas | ||
| Listra | ||
| Módulos de reservas corporativas e de casamento | ||
| Paypal | ||
| Rastreamento de conversões do Facebook | ||
| Relatórios automatizados | ||
| Reservas do Tripadvisor | ||
| Tarifas | ||
| Tarifas fixas, flutuantes e com desconto |
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ASI WebRes e STAAH Booking Engine compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ASI WebRes oferece 19 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto STAAH Booking Engine oferece 54. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ASI WebRes lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ASI WebRes: Nao. STAAH Booking Engine: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) tem um HT Score de 0 e STAAH tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos