The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 22 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Madeep se destaca .
Simple Booking se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 22 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 22 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Gerentes de Canal para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Madeep |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #26 5 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #19 12 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #18 3 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Madeep |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #23 9 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #22 8 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | — | #28 3 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #26 2 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Madeep |
|
|---|---|---|
| Europa ▾ | — | #13 19 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #22 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #12 2 avaliacoes |
When choosing a channel manager for your hotel, you’re likely balancing ease of use, feature set, support quality, and overall value. Madeep’s MAD Connect aims to automate review management and customer insights but lacks any publicly available reviews, integrations, or recent user feedback. In contrast, Simple Booking’s Channel Manager boasts 21 recent reviews, a near-perfect 4.95/5 ease of use score, and a strong customer support reputation, making it a much more tangible choice for most hoteliers.
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven support and features or are considering a system with limited publicly available feedback. Since Simple Booking has more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, it’s clear that more hoteliers are actively using and recommending their platform. Which aligns more closely with your hotel’s current needs?
MAD Connect and Simple Booking both serve the core purpose of connecting your hotel to various distribution channels. MAD Connect appears to focus on AI-driven customer insights and reviews, but there’s no recent or extensive review data to confirm its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Conversely, Simple Booking’s Channel Manager is a documented, widely adopted product with 21 recent reviews and a 9.62/10 NPS score, indicating strong customer satisfaction.
MAD Connect’s lack of reviews and recent activity makes it difficult to assess its performance or reliability. Simple Booking’s clear customer praise, especially around ease of use and support, suggests it’s a more dependable choice. Do you need a proven, well-reviewed product now, or are you exploring innovative solutions like MAD Connect’s AI capabilities?
If your hotel needs a reliable, user-friendly channel management system with extensive integrations and proven support, go with Simple Booking. Its 14 unique features—including PMS connectivity, analytics, multi-currency support, and inventory management—are designed to streamline your operations and improve revenue.
If your focus is on leveraging AI-driven customer insights and review management, and you’re willing to accept limited evidence of effectiveness, MAD Connect might be worth exploring. However, the lack of reviews and integrations makes it a riskier choice at this stage. For most hotels looking for immediate value, Simple Booking is the clear winner.
Simple Booking’s UI scores a near-perfect 4.95/5, with reviews praising its speed, ease, and modern interface. Users report that managing bookings and updates is intuitive, even for those less tech-savvy. On the other hand, MAD Connect has a 0/5 rating across all usability metrics, with no available user reviews or feedback to gauge its interface or onboarding experience.
Given the overwhelming positive feedback, it’s evident that Simple Booking prioritizes user experience and smooth onboarding. Edge: Simple Booking.
Simple Booking boasts 14 distinct features such as PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, multi-lingual support, inventory management, yield rules, and bulk updates. MAD Connect doesn’t list any exclusive features, and no additional functionality is publicly available or documented.
While MAD Connect might offer AI review analysis and tailored recommendations, the absence of feature details or customer feedback limits confidence in its capabilities. Simple Booking’s extensive feature set provides clear operational advantages. Edge: Simple Booking.
Simple Booking’s support scores 4.81/5, with reviews highlighting availability, responsiveness, and ongoing updates. Customers appreciate its attentive support and consistent communication, which is critical when managing complex distribution channels.
MAD Connect has no available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess the quality of their customer service. Given the importance of reliable support in channel management, Simple Booking’s track record makes it the safer choice. Edge: Simple Booking.
Simple Booking offers 56 verified integrations, including popular platforms like AdsHotel, Lybra Tech, RateBoard, and Sojern, covering a broad range of online travel agencies, GDS, and marketing tools. MAD Connect does not list any verified partners or integrations publicly.
The extensive integration network of Simple Booking ensures your hotel can connect to most channels and tools you rely on. Edge: Simple Booking.
With 21 recent reviews, Simple Booking’s users rate it highly for ease of use, support, and overall value, reflected in its 9.62/10 NPS score. Reviews emphasize its speed, simplicity, and effectiveness for independent hotels and resorts.
MAD Connect has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific ratings. Given the robust feedback for Simple Booking, it clearly has the higher reputation among hoteliers. Edge: Simple Booking.
MAD Connect does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, suggesting a custom or unavailable quote. Simple Booking charges $200 monthly, with no free tier or trials, providing transparency and ease of budgeting.
The transparent pricing of Simple Booking allows your team to evaluate ROI upfront. MAD Connect’s unclear costs make it harder to assess value or affordability at this stage.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Simple Booking is a well-established, feature-rich channel manager with proven user satisfaction, whereas MAD Connect appears to be an unreviewed, experimental AI review tool lacking user feedback or integration details.
If your hotel needs a reliable, supported, and widely adopted channel management platform, Simple Booking’s extensive features and positive reviews make it the obvious choice. Its high NPS score and robust integration ecosystem provide confidence in its ongoing performance.
Choose Simple Booking if your goal is to streamline operations, increase direct bookings, and rely on proven technology. MAD Connect’s AI review capabilities might appeal to innovative teams willing to accept a higher risk, but for now, Simple Booking’s maturity and user trust make it the safer, smarter investment.
Os precos de Gerentes de Canal raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Madeep |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, MAD Connect e Simple Booking (Channel Manager) compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Madeep |
|
|---|---|---|
| Conectividade PMS | ||
| Gestão de inventário | ||
| Integrações bidirecionais em tempo real | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Painel de análise | ||
| Suporte a várias moedas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 2 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. MAD Connect e Simple Booking (Channel Manager) compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Channel Managers, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. MAD Connect oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Simple Booking (Channel Manager) oferece 56. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Simple Booking (Channel Manager) lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
MAD Connect: Nao. Simple Booking (Channel Manager): Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Channel Managers oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Madeep tem um HT Score de 0 e Simple Booking tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.