Amadeus Property Management vs. Preno:
Qual e o Ideal para Voce?

The Decision

Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Amadeus Property Management and Preno aim to streamline your workflows, but they serve very different hotel segments and feature sets. Amadeus, with a long industry history and extensive distribution capabilities, is often favored by larger or more complex properties, while Preno's cloud-native approach and high customer ratings make it appealing for small to mid-sized hotels. Which suits your needs better?

Amadeus offers a broad suite of features with distribution integrations and multi-language/multi-currency support, but its user reviews are limited, and recent feedback is scarce. Preno, on the other hand, benefits from a large, recent review base, high user satisfaction, and a focus on simplicity and connectivity. Are you ready to explore the differences in detail?

Is Amadeus Property Management or Preno Better for Hotels?

Both products aim to manage reservations, guest data, and operational tasks, but they do so with different emphases. Amadeus provides a traditional, on-premise system with multi-lingual and multi-currency features appropriate for international or chain hotels, yet recent reviews are absent, and its overall user rating is low at 2.5/5. Conversely, Preno, with a 4.73/5 rating from 144 reviews, is cloud-based, easy to use, and highly rated for support and value.

Amadeus’s last reviews are over six years old, with a notably negative recent review citing service issues and ongoing problems. Preno’s latest reviews, all within the last six months, consistently praise its simplicity, customer support, and continuous upgrades. Given the strong recent review volume and high ratings, Preno’s reputation currently holds more weight. Are you comfortable with an older, less-reviewed system, or do you prefer the active, recent validation of Preno?

Preno vs Amadeus: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

Your choice depends heavily on your hotel’s size, complexity, and regional needs. If your hotel is a boutique, B&B, or small chain seeking an intuitive, cloud-based system with excellent support, Preno is the clear choice. It offers features like a booking engine, native email marketing, real-time status updates, and an EPoS system, all highly praised by users.

If your hotel is larger, requires multi-lingual or multi-currency support, or relies heavily on distribution channels, Amadeus may seem appealing. However, its limited recent reviews and lower overall ratings suggest it may not meet modern hotel demands as effectively as Preno. For most hoteliers evaluating current performance and support, Preno is the recommended option.

Is Amadeus Property Management or Preno Easier to Use?

Ease of use can make or break your staff adoption of a PMS. Amadeus scores a 3.5/5 for ease of use, with users citing its interface as manageable but noting older, less modern design elements. Its onboarding process appears adequate but not outstanding, and some users report ongoing difficulties with service responsiveness.

Preno excels with a 4.78/5 ease of use rating, with reviews highlighting its intuitive navigation, straightforward setup, and helpful support team. Multiple users describe onboarding as smooth and emphasize how quickly staff adapt to Preno’s simple, clean interface. Edge: Preno.

Which Has Better Features: Amadeus or Preno?

Amadeus offers 18 features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and on-premise deployment, catering to specific international and chain hotel needs. Its distribution integrations are extensive, with 104 verified partners, making it suitable for hotels that rely heavily on advanced distribution channels.

Preno boasts 30 features, including ancillary revenue tracking, real-time reporting, a booking engine, native email marketing, and a mobile app—features critical for small to medium hotels focused on operational agility. It also integrates with Xero and channel managers like SiteMinder, making daily management smoother.

While Amadeus has certain unique capabilities, the sheer number of features in Preno, especially its mobile app and automation tools, give it a noticeable advantage in user-perceived value. Edge: Preno.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Amadeus or Preno?

Customer support quality can impact your daily operations significantly. Amadeus’s support ratings average at 3.63/5, with reviews citing delays and inconsistent service, particularly in remote regions like the Netherlands. A negative review describes six years of unresolved issues and poor support experience.

Preno’s customer support averages 4.8/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, friendly, and effective assistance. Customers consistently mention how Preno’s team is proactive, responsive, and helpful, making onboarding and ongoing use much easier. Edge: Preno.

Which Has More Integrations: Amadeus or Preno?

Amadeus offers a robust network of 104 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment systems, and analytics tools. Its extensive integrations support complex, multi-channel distribution strategies, which are essential for larger or international hotels.

Preno has 17 verified partners, with key integrations including Xero, SiteMinder, and TrustYou. Its focus on core hotel management functions combined with essential integrations suits small to mid-sized hotels seeking reliable, straightforward connectivity.

Given the larger ecosystem supporting Amadeus, it has an edge for properties needing deep and broad integrations. Edge: Amadeus.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Amadeus or Preno?

Review data shows Preno with a 4.73/5 rating based on 144 reviews, while Amadeus scores only 2.5/5 from 4 reviews. Recent reviews overwhelmingly favor Preno’s ease of use, support, and feature set, with 95% likelihood to recommend and a 9.53/10 NPS score.

Amadeus’s reviews are sparse and include negative feedback about service and ongoing issues, with the best review still only rated 4.5/5. For current user satisfaction, Preno clearly leads.

Edge: Preno.

How Much Do Amadeus and Preno Cost?

Amadeus does not publish pricing information publicly, which suggests it operates on a customized quote basis, often making it more expensive and suitable for larger hotels or chains. Preno’s straightforward pricing is $800 per month, with no setup or implementation fees, making it transparent and accessible for smaller properties.

If budget transparency and predictable costs are important, Preno’s model provides better clarity. Amadeus likely costs more but offers customized, enterprise-level solutions.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Amadeus?

Hotels that will benefit most from Amadeus include:

• Large, international hotels requiring multi-lingual and multi-currency support.
• Properties that depend heavily on global distribution channels.
• Chain hotels with complex operational needs.
• Hotels with existing infrastructure that prefer on-premise systems.
• Hotels seeking advanced distribution and revenue management capabilities.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or prioritizes ease of use and quick setup.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Preno?

Preno is ideal for:

• Boutique hotels, bed & breakfasts, and small chains.
• Hotels seeking an easy-to-use, cloud-based system with minimal IT overhead.
• Properties prioritizing support, automation, and real-time reporting.
• Hotels with a focus on guest communication and online booking.
• Hotels looking for transparent, fixed monthly costs.

Not ideal if you require multi-lingual, multi-currency capabilities, or complex distribution integrations.

Preno vs Amadeus: The Bottom Line for Hotels

At its core, Amadeus offers a traditional, feature-rich system designed for larger, complex hotels with international demands. Its extensive integrations and multi-language/multi-currency support cater to global properties but come with limited recent reviews, making its current performance less certain.

Preno, with its high user ratings, recent positive reviews, and mobile-friendly features, is better suited for small to mid-sized hotels aiming for simplicity, excellent support, and cost transparency. Its feature set is comprehensive for its target segment, but it may lack some advanced distribution options.

If your hotel values ease of use, support, and recent validation, Preno is the recommended choice. For larger, international operations with complex needs, Amadeus may be appropriate but requires careful consideration given the limited latest feedback. Overall, Preno’s current user satisfaction makes it the stronger recommendation for most hoteliers today.