ASI PMS vs. Bokun:
Qual e o Ideal para Voce?

The Decision

Choosing between ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and Bokun involves evaluating core differences in features, user experience, support, and overall market presence. ASI PMS offers a comprehensive property management system tailored specifically for hotels, with a focus on streamlining operations and revenue management. Bokun, by contrast, specializes in tour and activity booking management, targeting experience providers rather than hotel operations.

Given the detailed reviews and recent user feedback, ASI PMS's strong recent engagement makes it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a full-featured PMS. Are you ready to compare how these two products stack up across key hotel management needs?

Is ASI PMS or Bokun Better for Hotels?

ASI PMS, with its 26 recent reviews and a high NPS score of 9.69 out of 5, is clearly favored by hotel operators. It provides extensive features specifically for hotel management, including reservations, front desk, housekeeping, billing, and detailed reporting.

Bokun, by comparison, has no recent reviews or ratings from hotel users, and its primary focus is on tour and activity bookings, not hotel operations. It lacks the dedicated hotel management features and user feedback that make ASI PMS more trustworthy for hotels.

Are you prioritizing a proven hotel PMS with active hotel user reviews, or are you exploring a niche booking platform?

ASI PMS vs Bokun: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a full-fledged PMS covering reservations, billing, housekeeping, and revenue management, go with ASI PMS. Its 26 recent reviews and high rating confirm its effectiveness for hotel operations.

If your goal is managing activity bookings, tours, or experiences as part of your hotel offerings, Bokun is suitable—although it lacks hotel-specific features and hotel operator reviews. Given your hotel’s core needs, ASI PMS is the clear choice for operational control.

Are you looking for a hotel-centric management system or a platform for experience bookings? The answer will guide your decision.

Is ASI PMS or Bokun Easier to Use?

ASI PMS boasts an ease of use rating of 4.88 out of 5, supported by consistent positive reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward workflows. Users highlight how quickly new staff can be trained and how easily daily tasks are managed.

Bokun has no available user ratings or detailed reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability for hoteliers. Its focus on activity bookings suggests a different user experience designed for activity providers, not hotel staff.

Edge: ASI PMS.

Which Has Better Features: ASI PMS or Bokun?

ASI PMS offers 47 distinct features, including multi-lingual support, centralized user management, online check-in, integrated payment processing, channel management, revenue modules, and advanced reporting tools. These features directly address hotel management needs, helping streamline operations and maximize revenue.

Bokun provides no detailed feature set or hotel management tools, focusing instead on booking components for tours and activities. Its lack of hotel-specific features makes it unsuitable for comprehensive hotel management.

Edge: ASI PMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: ASI PMS or Bokun?

Based on recent reviews, ASI PMS's support scores 4.73 out of 5, with users describing the team as professional, responsive, and helpful, especially for onboarding and technical issues. Support responsiveness is generally praised, though some mention room for faster response times.

Bokun has no recent reviews or ratings for customer support, making it difficult to evaluate its service quality for hotel clients. Its user base appears to be smaller and less engaged from a hotel perspective.

Edge: ASI PMS.

Which Has More Integrations: ASI PMS or Bokun?

ASI PMS integrates with 18 verified partners, including major booking engines, channel managers, revenue tools, and payment platforms like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn. These integrations streamline operations and distribution for hotels.

Bokun currently has no verified or listed integrations, limiting its connectivity options. For hotels relying on seamless connectivity across multiple systems, ASI PMS’s integrations are a significant advantage.

Edge: ASI PMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: ASI PMS or Bokun?

ASI PMS’s recent reviews reflect a high satisfaction rate, with a 97% likelihood to recommend among hotel users. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, stability, and comprehensive features, especially in North America and other regions.

Bokun, lacking recent hotel reviews, defaults to a neutral position without user ratings. Its user base appears more focused on activity providers rather than hotels, making hotel-specific ratings unavailable.

Edge: ASI PMS.

How Much Do ASI PMS and Bokun Cost?

ASI PMS costs $300 monthly, with no additional implementation or hidden fees, offering a predictable investment for hotel management. Pricing details for Bokun are not publicly available, which could complicate budgeting.

Bokun’s pricing model is unavailable, limiting direct cost comparison. However, the clear and transparent pricing of ASI PMS simplifies decision-making for hotels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ASI PMS?

• Hotels seeking a full property management system to streamline reservations, billing, and housekeeping.
• Hotels that need advanced reporting and revenue management tools.
• Properties aiming for multi-property management and scalable operations.
• Hotels prioritizing integrations with OTAs, payment gateways, and channel managers.
• Teams that value stability, detailed analytics, and user-friendly interfaces.

Not ideal if your hotel primarily offers tours or experiences rather than traditional lodging.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Bokun?

• Hotels integrating with a broader activity or tour booking platform.
• Small or boutique hotels offering experiences or packages as part of their services.
• Teams that need a simple booking widget or API to embed activity reservations on their website.
• Operators seeking to expand their reach through travel channels supported by Bokun.
• Hotels with minimal reliance on complex property management features.

Not ideal if you require a comprehensive PMS for daily hotel operations or detailed reporting.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

ASI PMS’s core advantage lies in its complete hotel management capabilities, proven stability, and robust recent reviews from active hotel users. It addresses every fundamental hotel need, from reservations to revenue optimization, with a broad range of integrations.

Bokun, while effective for activity booking, does not serve as a comprehensive hotel PMS. Its lack of recent hotel reviews and features makes it unsuitable for hotels seeking operational control and detailed management tools.

Choose ASI PMS if you want a mature, hotel-focused system supported by recent reviews, active customer support, and extensive integrations. Opt for Bokun only if your hotel’s core operations revolve around activity bookings and you do not need a full PMS solution.

This comparison is grounded in current user data, recent reviews, and feature analysis, ensuring you make an informed, confident decision for your hotel’s management system.