The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
AutoClerk, Inc. se destaca .
SiteMinder se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.3/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Performance Reporting and Mobile optimized/responsive.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 1,332 |
Apos analisar 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do AutoClerk, Inc. mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do SiteMinder destacam channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, desafios no suporte ao cliente. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 470 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #50 0 avaliacoes | #1 527 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #46 0 avaliacoes | #1 96 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #1 50 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 564 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #48 0 avaliacoes | #1 411 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #44 0 avaliacoes | #1 230 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 174 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #41 0 avaliacoes | #2 157 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #5 266 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #1 418 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #3 13 avaliacoes |
You’re evaluating two booking engines—AutoClerk and SiteMinder—that aim to boost your hotel's direct bookings, streamline distribution, and manage reservations more efficiently. While both solve the core problem of online booking management, they diverge significantly in features, support, and market reach. AutoClerk’s small user base and limited recent reviews contrast sharply with SiteMinder’s extensive global presence and ongoing user feedback, positioning SiteMinder as the more reliable choice today.
Are you prioritizing a platform with proven scalability, a broad partner network, and recent hotel reviews? Or are you considering a more niche, independent solution? The answer depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
AutoClerk offers a straightforward, web-based booking engine designed mainly for independent hotels and management companies. However, it has zero recent reviews, a very limited user base, and no recent feedback, making it difficult to assess ongoing support or product evolution. Conversely, SiteMinder boasts over 1,200 reviews in the past six months, with a 4.48/5 overall rating and a strong Net Promoter Score of 9.08/10.
SiteMinder’s extensive feature set includes multi-channel distribution, real-time rate updates, and integrations with PMS systems, making it suitable for hotels aiming for growth and broader online visibility. AutoClerk’s minimal recent data suggests it may no longer be actively evolving or supporting a broad user base.
Given the volume of recent reviews and high ratings, SiteMinder clearly dominates in current hotel market confidence. Do you want a proven, extensively supported platform or a less tested alternative?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich booking engine that integrates with a wide array of distribution channels, go with SiteMinder. Its 39 unique features—including rate comparison, multi-currency support, and PMS connectivity—are designed to maximize your reach and revenue. On the other hand, if your hotel prioritizes simplicity and has minimal distribution needs, AutoClerk’s limited feature set and lack of recent support data might suffice, but it’s less likely to support growth.
Hotels seeking international presence and robust analytics will find SiteMinder’s global reach and scalable platform more aligned with their goals. Smaller properties or independent hotels content with basic booking functions might consider AutoClerk, but the absence of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing support and development.
SiteMinder has a user rating of 4.6/5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process—average onboarding ratings are 4.4/5. Conversely, AutoClerk’s ratings are nonexistent, and reviews are sparse and outdated, with some praising its power but also noting difficulties resolving issues.
Based on current feedback, SiteMinder’s platform is more accessible for staff training and daily use, especially given its mobile-optimized interface and clear navigation. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder offers 39 exclusive features, including room and rate filtering, performance reporting, yield rules, multi-lingual support, automated emails, and website integration—all geared toward advanced revenue management and distribution. AutoClerk, by comparison, has no unique features listed and appears to focus mainly on basic reservation management and web booking.
If your hotel requires sophisticated rate management, extensive channel control, and detailed analytics, SiteMinder’s comprehensive feature set provides a clear advantage. AutoClerk may serve smaller, less complex properties, but it lacks the depth to support scalable growth. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder has a support rating of 4.43/5, with recent reviews describing responsive, multilingual help and quick issue resolution—examples include users praising its “excellent support team” and “instant help when needed.” AutoClerk, on the other hand, has no recent review data, and previous feedback indicated difficulty resolving problems and a lack of follow-up support.
Given SiteMinder’s active support team and recent positive feedback, it is the more dependable choice for hotels that cannot afford downtime or delays. AutoClerk’s support record is too uncertain to rely on. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder integrates with 245 verified partners, including PMS, revenue management, and CRM systems, with six shared partners with AutoClerk. It supports over 400 OTAs and offers extensive API access, making it highly adaptable for diverse operational needs.
AutoClerk’s smaller ecosystem of only 8 verified partners limits its interoperability and potential for future expansion. If your hotel depends on seamless connectivity and scalable integrations, SiteMinder’s ecosystem is the clear winner. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s recent reviews showcase a strong 4.48/5 overall rating, with hotels ranging from boutique to large properties praising its ease of use and performance. Independent hotels, resorts, and city center hotels particularly rate it highly, often citing increased bookings and operational efficiency.
AutoClerk has no recent reviews, making current hotel sentiment impossible to gauge. Its previous reputation was limited to small, independent properties, but the lack of recent feedback makes it less reliable. For ongoing support and user satisfaction, SiteMinder wins decisively.
AutoClerk does not list pricing publicly, but it appears to be a web booking engine targeted at smaller hotels or management companies with straightforward needs. In contrast, SiteMinder charges a $500 monthly base fee, with no additional implementation or per-room costs.
While the higher upfront cost of SiteMinder might seem daunting, its extensive features and support justify the investment for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency. AutoClerk’s minimal cost structure could appeal to very small properties, but at the expense of scalability and support.
Not ideal if you plan to expand or require sophisticated revenue management features, multi-channel distribution, or advanced analytics.
Not ideal if you have very simple booking needs or operate a single small property with minimal online distribution requirements.
SiteMinder is a comprehensive, globally recognized platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and recent positive reviews from over 1,200 hotels. Its scalability and integrations make it suitable for hotels with growth ambitions, while its user-friendly interface supports staff adoption.
AutoClerk, while potentially suitable for very small or independent properties with limited distribution needs, suffers from a lack of recent user feedback and a limited feature set. Its minimal ongoing support and small partner network make it a less attractive choice for hotels planning to expand.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich booking engine with broad connectivity and active support, SiteMinder is the clear choice. For simple, budget-conscious properties, AutoClerk might suffice—but at the risk of limited support and scalability.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Autoclerk (Web Booking Engine) e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API aberta | ||
| Comparação da tarifa do quarto | ||
| Filtragem de tipo de quarto e tarifa | ||
| Filtros de compras de taxa rápida | ||
| Relatório de desempenho | ||
| Taxa de inteligência |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 27 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Autoclerk (Web Booking Engine) e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Autoclerk (Web Booking Engine) oferece 8 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto SiteMinder Booking Engine oferece 245. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. SiteMinder Booking Engine lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Autoclerk (Web Booking Engine): Nao. SiteMinder Booking Engine: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. AutoClerk, Inc. tem um HT Score de 0 e SiteMinder tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos