The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 20 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Big Fish Internet se destaca .
Neobookings se destaca em ease of use and customer support .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 20 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 20 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Design de Websites para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #12 6 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #13 10 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #9 4 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | — | #18 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 11 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #13 7 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | — | #16 3 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #10 3 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| Europa ▾ | — | #14 5 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #17 0 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right website design platform for your hotel hinges on your priorities: ease of use, support, features, and overall value. Both Big Fish Internet and Neobookings aim to elevate your online presence, but they diverge significantly in their approach, user feedback, and market presence. Big Fish offers a comprehensive website management system, while Neobookings emphasizes beautiful, conversion-focused hotel websites paired with reservation tools.
Given that Neobookings has gathered more recent reviews and a larger number of favorable ratings, it currently provides a more reliable gauge of user satisfaction. This makes it the stronger choice for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly, well-supported website solution. But does the difference in focus and support justify a decision? Let’s examine each aspect closely.
Big Fish Internet presents itself as a broad website management platform designed to handle everything from hosting to content updates, with an emphasis on security and technical control. Its reviews are scarce, with no recent data or user feedback to substantiate its performance, reliability, or ease of use.
In contrast, Neobookings specializes in creating visually appealing, high-conversion hotel websites complemented by reservation management tools. It boasts 20 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.8, and a customer support rating of 5/5, indicating strong, recent user satisfaction.
While Big Fish touts its platform’s security and scalability, the lack of recent review data makes it tough to assess its current effectiveness. Neobookings’ recent positive feedback emphasizes its support, ease of use, and ongoing product improvements, making it a more dependable choice for hotels aiming to modernize their digital presence. Are you willing to base your decision on an untested, unreviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a website builder that prioritizes intuitive design, fast onboarding, and reliable support, go with Neobookings. It is especially suitable for properties that want an attractive, conversion-oriented site with integrated booking capabilities, supported by a team that actively improves their product.
If your team requires a comprehensive website management system focused on technical control, security, and extensive customization—possibly for larger or enterprise-level operations—Big Fish might initially seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews makes it difficult to confirm if it meets current industry standards.
For hoteliers seeking proven support, a user-friendly interface, and ongoing innovation, Neobookings clearly emerges as the better fit today. The platform's recent reviews and high recommendation rate solidify its standing as the more dependable solution.
Neobookings scores a near-perfect 4.85/5 for ease of use, backed by 20 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and excellent customer support. Users frequently describe the platform as “very professional,” “easy to navigate,” and “a pleasure to work with,” emphasizing the seamless experience and rapid setup.
Big Fish Internet, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its user experience. Its platform is designed for website management, but without recent feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Given the clear, recent positive feedback, Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings offers a suite of features tailored to hotels: a visually appealing website builder, integrated reservation engine, digital campaigns, and 20 verified partners including SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp. Its platform is designed to increase direct bookings and streamline operations.
Big Fish Internet claims to be a comprehensive website management platform but provides no specific features or integrations, and no verified partner data. Its feature set remains undefined, making it difficult to assess its capabilities or compare them meaningfully.
Edge: Neobookings, with its clear, targeted feature set and verified integrations.
Neobookings receives a perfect 5/5 support rating based on recent reviews praising its “super effective technical support” and “wonderful human team.” Customers highlight their satisfaction with ongoing communication, quick problem resolution, and proactive product updates.
Big Fish Internet has no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Its absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine if it offers the responsive service that hoteliers need.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings integrates with 20 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp, making it highly flexible for hotel operations and marketing. Its platform supports a variety of digital tools that directly enhance booking conversions and operational efficiency.
Big Fish Internet has no verified integrations or partner data, signaling limited or nonexistent connectivity with other hotel tech solutions. This restriction could hinder future growth or integration efforts.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings’ recent reviews reveal an exceptionally high likelihood to recommend score of 98%, with users describing it as “delightful to work with” and “an example of how all companies should operate.” Its target segment includes a diverse range of properties, from luxury hotels to boutique and city center hotels, with positive feedback across segments.
Big Fish Internet lacks any recent reviews, ratings, or customer feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment-specific performance. The absence of recent data favors Neobookings as the more trusted platform today.
Edge: Neobookings.
Big Fish Internet’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent pricing model—raising questions about value and accessibility.
Neobookings charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free trial, but offers a clear, predictable fee structure. Its focus on transparency and recent reviews of value for money (ROI of 4.74/5) suggest it’s a good investment for hotels seeking a balance of performance and affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel values ease of use, quick setup, or support—since these are unverified or absent for Big Fish.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a highly customizable backend or operates in regions where Neobookings has limited presence.
Big Fish Internet offers a broad, potentially scalable website management solution, but its lack of recent reviews or detailed features makes it hard to recommend confidently. Its focus on technical control might appeal to larger, tech-savvy teams but leaves smaller hoteliers in the dark regarding support and ease of use.
Neobookings, meanwhile, excels in recent customer satisfaction, ease of use, and support, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels today. It provides a well-rounded package—beautiful design, integrated booking, and strong support—that can help your hotel attract and convert more guests.
If your priority is rapid deployment, support, and proven user satisfaction, go with Neobookings. If you need deep customization and have technical resources, and are willing to accept the risk of limited recent feedback, Big Fish might meet your needs. For now, the data clearly favors Neobookings as the safer, more effective choice.
Os precos de Design de Websites raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Big Fish Internet |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
Estas sao as funcionalidades que cada fornecedor configurou, organizadas por grupo de funcionalidades — os mesmos dados mostrados no painel do fornecedor. Expanda um grupo para comparar as funcionalidades lado a lado.
| Funcionalidade | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Design & Content Management
|
|
|
| Construtor de páginas de arrastar e soltar | ||
| Modelos de site de hotel | ||
| Capacidade de Whitelabel | ||
| Temas totalmente personalizáveis | ||
| Compositor de postagens de blog | ||
| Mapas de atrações personalizáveis | ||
| Personalização de site | ||
|
▾
Conversion
|
|
|
| Marcação AMP do Google | ||
| Funcionalidade de vitrine/voucher | ||
| Otimizado para dispositivos móveis/responsivo | ||
| Revisar widgets | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Pop-ups e alertas | ||
| Mapas de atrações personalizáveis | ||
| Personalização de site | ||
|
▾
Internationalization
|
|
|
| Multilíngue | ||
|
▾
Analytics
|
|
|
| Conexão do Google Analytics | ||
|
▾
SEO & Traffic
|
|
|
| Integrações de mídia social | ||
| Marcação AMP do Google | ||
| Otimizado para dispositivos móveis/responsivo | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Plugins de SEO | ||
| Mapas de atrações personalizáveis | ||
|
▾
Security & Compliance
|
|
|
| Protocolos de segurança (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| Compatível com ADA | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| Funcionalidade de vitrine/voucher |
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Big Fish Internet e Neobookings Web Design compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Website Design, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Big Fish Internet oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Neobookings Web Design oferece 20. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Neobookings Web Design lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Big Fish Internet: Nao. Neobookings Web Design: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Website Design oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Big Fish Internet tem um HT Score de 0 e Neobookings tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.