The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 85 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Blastness se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
MappingMaster se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 85 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 85 | 0 |
Apos analisar 85 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Blastness mais valorizam gestão de canais, apoio e assistência, revenue management, enquanto os usuarios do MappingMaster destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Gestão de Canais
▾
|
|
|
+
Apoio e assistência
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração de Sistemas
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Gerentes de Canal para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #11 32 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #7 48 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | #33 0 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 25 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #9 36 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #11 18 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada | #17 3 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #16 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #7 83 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico | #21 0 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Blastness Channel Manager and MappingMaster Channel Manager hinges on your hotel’s needs for sophistication, integration, and growth potential. Both products aim to streamline your online distribution, but Blastness offers a more comprehensive, feature-rich solution backed by extensive reviews and recent positive feedback. MappingMaster, meanwhile, provides a simpler, straightforward approach to multi-channel updates but lacks the depth of features and user validation that Blastness delivers.
Your decision should depend on whether you prioritize advanced tools and proven performance or a basic, easy-to-use system. Do you want a platform that scales with your property and offers detailed analytics, or one that gets the essentials done efficiently? Let’s explore how these two compare in key areas.
Blastness and MappingMaster both serve the core function of managing your hotel’s online distribution channels, but they diverge significantly in scope and reviews. Blastness, founded in 2004 in Italy, has established a broad presence across six regions, serving a mix of luxury, boutique, and branded hotels, and boasts 81 reviews with recent feedback from 17 in the last six months. It consistently earns high scores for ease of use, customer support, and value, with a 98% likelihood of recommendation.
MappingMaster, based in Switzerland since 2017, appears to target smaller properties like holiday units, B&Bs, and hostels. It offers a less comprehensive feature set and has no available reviews, making it difficult to assess real-world performance or customer satisfaction. With only one verified integration and no recent reviews, MappingMaster’s market presence and credibility are limited. Are you comfortable choosing a product without proven customer feedback?
Edge: Blastness.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, validated platform that supports sophisticated revenue management, multiple languages, multi-currency support, and detailed analytics, Blastness is the clear choice. It is especially suitable for properties that require detailed control, automation, and a proven track record of supporting large and small hotels alike.
Conversely, if your property is a small operation such as a B&B or hostel that primarily needs basic online rate and availability updates across a handful of portals, MappingMaster might suffice. Its simplicity could be advantageous if you prefer an uncomplicated system for daily updates without advanced analytics or integrations. However, the lack of reviews and detailed feature info limits confidence in its long-term reliability.
In summary, for hotels seeking proven, comprehensive management, Blastness is the safer bet. For minimal needs and quick updates, MappingMaster may be considered, but with caution given its limited validation.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness receives a remarkable ease-of-use rating of 4.84 out of 5, based on 81 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users appreciate its clear dashboards, smooth PMS connectivity, and helpful onboarding, with an average onboarding rating of 4.76 out of 5. Support is highly rated at 4.88 out of 5, with many users describing the team as responsive and proactive.
MappingMaster offers no available ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to judge its usability or onboarding experience. Given the absence of review data, it’s uncertain whether it offers comparable simplicity or requires extensive training.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness boasts 15 exclusive features, including yield rules, support for weekly and monthly rates, derived rates, inventory management, channel self-mapping, bulk updates, real-time 2-way integrations, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, integrated payment processing, and advanced analytics dashboards. These features collectively support complex pricing strategies and streamline operations.
MappingMaster offers fewer features with no detailed list available. Its core function appears to be basic rate and availability updates across portals, lacking the advanced tools found in Blastness.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness enjoys a 4.88 out of 5 customer support rating, with reviews praising its caring, professional team and quick responses. Customers highlight recurring meetings, insights, and proactive support as key strengths, contributing to a high Net Promoter Score of 9.74 out of 10.
MappingMaster provides no support ratings or reviews, so assessing its support quality is impossible. Its lack of feedback suggests it may not be as established or responsive as Blastness.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers integrations with 15 verified partners, including prominent systems like Oracle Hospitality, hotelcube, and Vertical Booking. This extensive partner network enables smooth connections with PMS, CRS, and other hotel management tools, enhancing automation and data flow.
MappingMaster has only a single verified partner, RoomPriceGenie, limiting its integration options and potential for broader connectivity. This restricts its flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s reviews, totaling 81 with recent feedback from 17 hotels, consistently rate it highly for ease of use, support, and value. Hoteliers from diverse segments, especially hotels in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, praise its reliability, comprehensive features, and professional support. Its 98% likelihood to recommend underscores satisfaction.
MappingMaster has no publicly available reviews or ratings, preventing any meaningful comparison. Its market presence and user feedback are insufficient to gauge hoteliers’ satisfaction.
Edge: Blastness.
Pricing details for Blastness are not publicly disclosed; it likely offers custom quotes based on property size and needs, typical for enterprise-grade systems. No free trial or freemium options are available.
MappingMaster’s pricing is similarly unavailable, and with no trial or review data, estimating value is difficult. Both products appear to operate on bespoke pricing models, typical for channel management solutions.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Blastness offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform supported by a strong user base and recent positive reviews, making it suitable for a wide range of hotel types. Its extensive integrations, advanced tools, and proven support justify its higher complexity and likely cost.
MappingMaster provides a basic, straightforward solution ideal for small properties with simple needs, but its lack of reviews and features makes it less reliable for hotels seeking growth or advanced management capabilities. Its minimal presence suggests it’s best for very small operations or those with minimal requirements.
If your hotel values proven performance, detailed control, and scalable features, Blastness is the clear choice. If you only need basic rate and availability management on a tight budget or low complexity, MappingMaster might be enough—but proceed cautiously without customer validation.
This comparison underscores the importance of recent, validated user feedback and extensive feature sets. Given Blastness’s more extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, it stands out as the safer, more capable choice for hotels aiming to optimize their online distribution and revenue management.
Os precos de Gerentes de Canal raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|---|
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Blastness Channel Manager e MappingMaster Channel Manager compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automapeamento de canal | ||
| Gestão de inventário | ||
| Grade de inventário | ||
| Regras de rendimento | ||
| Suporte para tarifas semanais e mensais | ||
| Taxas derivadas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 3 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 3 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
O Blastness Channel Manager destaca-se pela sincronização em tempo real, disponibilidade e preços consistentes, reduzindo os riscos de overbooking. Os... O Blastness Channel Manager destaca-se pela sincronização em tempo real, disponibilidade e preços consistentes, reduzindo os riscos de overbooking. Os usuários o consideram intuitivo e essencial para uma gestão de distribuição otimizada em múltiplos canais.
Embora a Blastness seja elogiada pelo seu excelente e rápido suporte ao cliente, alguns usuários sugerem estender o horário de atendimento, incluindo... Embora a Blastness seja elogiada pelo seu excelente e rápido suporte ao cliente, alguns usuários sugerem estender o horário de atendimento, incluindo fins de semana, para melhor lidar com problemas urgentes.
Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven... Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven approach allows for dynamic pricing, enhancing overall profitability.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Blastness Channel Manager e MappingMaster Channel Manager compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Channel Managers, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Blastness Channel Manager oferece 15 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto MappingMaster Channel Manager oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Blastness Channel Manager lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Blastness Channel Manager: Nao. MappingMaster Channel Manager: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Channel Managers oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Blastness tem um HT Score de 78 e MappingMaster tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos