The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 551 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Bnovo (Биново) se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 551 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 2 | 549 |
Apos analisar 551 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Bnovo (Биново) mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #55 1 avaliacoes | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #51 0 avaliacoes | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #70 1 avaliacoes | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #70 0 avaliacoes | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #39 2 avaliacoes | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and overall profitability. You are evaluating Bnovo PMS by Bnovo and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME, both designed to automate core tasks but differing greatly in maturity, features, and support. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent reviews, extensive features, or cost—each product aims to streamline hotel operations but targets different hotel profiles.
Bnovo offers a more affordable, simpler solution primarily serving motels and villas with limited reviews and less recent feedback. HotelTime, with over 430 recent reviews, offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform preferred by a wide range of property types, especially larger or more complex hotels. Which aligns better with your current needs and growth plans?
Both Bnovo and HotelTime aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge sharply in their maturity and user feedback. Bnovo’s limited review count (only 2) and lack of recent feedback suggest a less stable or widely adopted platform, especially outside its core markets. Conversely, HotelTime boasts 433 reviews, with 27 from the last 6 months, offering a more current and representative user perspective.
HotelTime's reviews highlight its robust real-time management, automation, and extensive integrations, making it appear more suited for hospitality businesses seeking scalability and advanced features. Bnovo’s reviews underscore connectivity to sales channels and ease of implementation but also mention stability issues and poor support. Do you need a proven, well-supported PMS or a more niche, budget-friendly option?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that supports complex operations, extensive integrations, and has a proven track record, HotelTime is the clear choice. It is ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and properties that need automation, POS, spa modules, and detailed reporting—evidenced by its 4.83/5 rating and extensive third-party partnerships.
If your hotel is small, budget-sensitive, or in a region where Bnovo’s language-specific knowledge base and channel integrations suffice, then Bnovo might suit your needs. However, be aware that its limited reviews and recent feedback indicate potential stability and support concerns. For most hotels prioritizing reliability and comprehensive features, HotelTime’s more recent, higher-rated offering is the safer choice.
Bnovo’s user ratings reflect a moderate ease of use at 3/5, with particular praise for its implementation process and personal room layout. However, reviews cite a "disgusting interface" and frequent server crashes, making the platform frustrating and difficult to adopt fully.
HotelTime scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, with users describing its interface as intuitive and management reporting as simple and clear. Its onboarding process is highly rated at 4.63/5, and users frequently mention how quickly staff adapt to it. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 32 features exclusive to its platform, including guest CRM, automated night audits, online check-in, mobile app, real-time reporting, and integrated payment terminals—features critical for larger or multifaceted properties. Bnovo, with no unique features listed, only shares 19 common features, indicating a more streamlined or basic function set.
HotelTime’s broader feature set allows for better automation, guest management, and operational control, making it more adaptable to complex property needs. Bnovo’s features may suffice for simple operations but lack depth for expansion. Edge: HotelTime.
Support ratings show a stark contrast: Bnovo scores a mere 1.25/5, with reviews criticizing support responsiveness and bug fixes, sometimes describing the support as "very bad." Users report support staff working "not in accordance with ITIL standards" and experiencing prolonged outages.
HotelTime’s support is rated 4.73/5, with reviewers citing quick, helpful responses and excellent onboarding. Clients describe their support as "responsive and knowledgeable," which significantly eases implementation and troubleshooting. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partner integrations, including popular systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, alongside extensive third-party modules. Bnovo only lists 2 verified partners—Compare.me and Aiosell Technologies—limiting its connectivity options.
This extensive integration ecosystem makes HotelTime more flexible, allowing your hotel to build a comprehensive tech stack. Bnovo’s limited integrations restrict potential automation and data sharing. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews, with 27 recent comments, consistently rate the platform highly, especially among larger properties and chains, with an overall score of 4.83/5. Hoteliers praise its user-friendliness, automation, and dedicated support.
Bnovo’s limited reviews (only 2) and ratings (2/5 overall) reflect dissatisfaction with stability and support, especially concerning server crashes and bugs. HotelTime’s stronger recent feedback makes it the preferred choice for property owners seeking reliable, well-reviewed software. Edge: HotelTime.
Bnovo does not publicly list pricing, suggesting a customized quote based on property size and needs. HotelTime charges a base fee of $600 per month, which covers a broad array of features and integrations.
While HotelTime’s pricing is transparent, it is higher than Bnovo’s, reflecting its extensive capabilities. Budget-conscious hotels might lean toward Bnovo, but larger properties requiring reliability and features will find the value in HotelTime’s investment.
Hotels or hostels that:
Teams that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Teams that:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime is a mature, feature-rich platform with a broad integration ecosystem, making it suitable for larger or complex properties. Bnovo, while more affordable, is less stable, has fewer features, and lacks recent positive reviews, indicating less reliability and support.
If your hotel prioritizes automation, integrations, and support, HotelTime’s higher investment is justified. For small, budget-minded properties with minimal needs, Bnovo might suffice but comes with significant risks.
HotelTime’s extensive reviews and recent feedback confirm it as the more dependable, scalable solution. Bnovo’s limited, older reviews make it a riskier choice unless your property’s scope is very narrow.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for growth, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction, HotelTime’s platform is the recommended option. Bnovo may only be viable for small, simple operations in specific regions, but its support issues and limited features caution against relying on it long-term.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Bnovo PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham 19 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| Aplicativo móvel | ||
| Auditoria noturna automatizada | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| Módulo de spa e bem-estar | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 20 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Melhor classificado em
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Bnovo PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Bnovo PMS oferece 2 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 3.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Bnovo PMS: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Bnovo (Биново) tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos