The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 195 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Breezeway se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Customizable per room checklists and Cleaning checklists.
hub OS se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (5.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile Request Dispatching.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 195 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 18 | 177 |
Apos analisar 195 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Breezeway mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do hub OS destacam eficiência na gestão de tarefas, opções de personalização, módulo de limpeza. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Eficiência na gestão de tarefas
▾
|
|
|
+
Opções de personalização
▾
|
|
|
+
Módulo de limpeza
▾
|
|
|
+
Módulo de manutenção
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Integração com PMS
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de limpeza para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #7 4 avaliacoes | #5 13 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #13 11 avaliacoes | #4 85 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #13 3 avaliacoes | #2 62 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #16 0 avaliacoes | #5 9 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #16 3 avaliacoes | #4 74 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #17 3 avaliacoes | #3 73 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #14 5 avaliacoes | #2 70 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #16 1 avaliacoes | #8 11 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #6 18 avaliacoes | #8 10 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #3 132 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #8 1 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #2 7 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right housekeeping software can make a significant difference in your hotel's daily operations, guest satisfaction, and staff productivity. Breezeway and hub OS both aim to streamline housekeeping tasks, but they serve different hotel types and operational needs. Breezeway is primarily designed for short-term rentals and vacation properties, while hub OS caters to larger hotels and resorts with more complex operational requirements. Which solution aligns best with your property's size, segment, and technology ecosystem?
Both products aim to improve task management, communication, and reporting, yet they diverge in features, user experience, and market presence. Breezeway, with only 18 reviews, has limited recent feedback, raising questions about its current usability and support. Conversely, hub OS boasts 161 reviews, all within the last six months, making its reputation clearer and more reliable. Given the review volume and recency, hub OS presents a more mature and proven platform for larger properties.
Are you ready to make a data-backed choice that aligns with your specific hotel profile and operational priorities?
While Breezeway has been a leader in vacation rental operations with a focus on property maintenance and guest communication, its limited review count and recent activity suggest less ongoing development and support. hub OS, on the other hand, with a 4.88/5 rating from 161 recent reviews, demonstrates broad acceptance across various hotel segments, especially large properties and resorts. Its higher review volume and more recent feedback make it the stronger candidate for hotels seeking proven reliability today.
In terms of overall rating, hub OS's 4.88/5 vastly outpaces Breezeway's 0/5 rating, indicating more consistent user satisfaction. The difference in review count and recency significantly influences the confidence you can have in each platform's current performance and support quality. Therefore, hub OS is the recommended choice for hoteliers prioritizing stability, feature richness, and a trusted vendor.
Both platforms address operational efficiency, task tracking, and communication, but they target different hotel types and operational complexities. Breezeway is tailored for short-term rentals, vacation homes, and villas, offering features like customizable checklists, multi-lingual support, and remote inspections. It excels in simplifying property-specific workflows, but its limited recent reviews cast doubt on ongoing development and support.
Meanwhile, hub OS is designed for larger hotels, resorts, and branded properties, providing extensive modules like automated room assignments, lost & found management, and API integrations. Its recent reviews emphasize its seamless cross-departmental communication, real-time updates, and detailed reporting capabilities. Do your property's needs lean toward managing individual vacation rentals or handling complex hotel operations?
In summary, Breezeway is better suited for small, vacation rental-focused properties, while hub OS is ideal for full-service hotels with multiple departments. Given the current review data, hub OS’s proven track record makes it the safer, more reliable choice for larger operations.
If your hotel needs a streamlined, all-in-one platform with extensive operational modules, go with hub OS. Its features like automated room assignments, open API, and detailed reporting are designed for properties with high occupancy and multiple departments. For hotels that prioritize real-time data, task automation, and cross-department collaboration, hub OS provides proven tools backed by 161 recent reviews.
On the other hand, if your property is primarily short-term or vacation rentals, and your focus is on cleaning checklists, remote inspections, and multilingual support, Breezeway could be a fit. However, given its limited recent reviews and ongoing billing issues reported by some users, its suitability for scaled hotel operations appears less robust.
For larger hotels or resorts seeking reliability, support, and proven ROI, hub OS clearly stands out. Breezeway might serve smaller, niche properties better, but it currently lacks the review confidence and recent activity to recommend broadly.
Both platforms score highly on ease of use, with Breezeway rated 4.56/5 and hub OS slightly higher at 4.86/5. Breezeway’s interface is described as straightforward for scheduling and reporting, but some users find it complicated for field employees and report issues with billing and task management. Its onboarding score of 4.65/5 indicates a relatively smooth initial setup, but recent support concerns could impact staff adoption.
hub OS’s user interface is praised for being intuitive and stable, especially on mobile devices. Reviews highlight that staff across departments find it easy to navigate, with onboarding rated 4.76/5. Its real-time updates and task management features are perceived as more user-friendly, enabling faster adoption and fewer training hurdles.
Edge: hub OS.
Breezeway offers 8 features not found in hub OS, including customizable checklists, cleaning protocols, multi-lingual support, remote inspections, and compliance tracking—ideal for short-term rental operations emphasizing property standards. It also integrates well with Airbnb and other PMS systems, adding flexibility for vacation property managers.
hub OS provides 5 unique features, such as lost & found management, automated room assignments, drag-and-drop scheduling, an open API, and mobile request dispatching—tailored for larger hotels requiring detailed task automation and department integration. It boasts a total of 13 shared features, covering core housekeeping needs like checklists, task tracking, and reporting.
The choice depends on your hotel’s complexity: Breezeway’s specific property checklists and compliance tools are great for managing individual rentals, while hub OS’s automation and department connectivity suit multi-department hotels. Given the broad feature set and recent reviews, hub OS offers the more comprehensive hotel-specific functionality.
Edge: hub OS.
Breezeway’s support rating is 4.5/5 based on 18 reviews, with some users citing billing issues and difficulty resolving complex problems. The limited recent feedback makes it harder to gauge current support responsiveness or improvements.
hub OS scores slightly higher at 4.8/5 from 161 recent reviews, with users praising its quick response times and proactive support. Many mention that the support team is attentive, helpful, and quick to implement improvements based on user feedback, contributing to higher satisfaction.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, hub OS’s support experience is clearly more reassuring for hotel operators who rely on dependable customer service.
Edge: hub OS.
Breezeway integrates with 15 verified partners, including PMS and channel managers like Guesty, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder. Its integrations focus mainly on vacation rental platforms and PMS systems, facilitating property management and OTA connections.
hub OS boasts 23 verified integrations, including shared integrations with Breezeway and additional partners like HiJiffy, Quinta, and Infor. Its open API allows for custom integrations, enabling hotels to connect with maintenance, POS systems, and other operational tools.
For hotels seeking extensive connectivity and customization, hub OS’s broader integration ecosystem provides more flexibility and future-proofing.
Edge: hub OS.
Given Breezeway’s limited review volume, it’s difficult to gauge overall hotel satisfaction accurately. Its only 18 reviews, with a 99% likelihood to recommend, suggest strong satisfaction among its niche users, mostly vacation rental managers.
hub OS’s 161 recent reviews yield an average rating of 4.88/5, with properties across hotel segments consistently praising its ease of use, support, and functionality. The high review volume reinforces confidence in its performance, especially among large hotels and resorts.
Clearly, hoteliers rate hub OS higher because of its proven reliability and breadth of features, supported by recent, extensive feedback.
Edge: hub OS.
Breezeway does not publicly disclose its pricing, which could indicate custom quotes based on property size or a tiered model. This lack of transparency makes cost comparisons difficult but suggests it may be more expensive or complex for larger properties.
hub OS charges a flat $300/month, with no free tier or per-room fees, indicating a straightforward pricing model suitable for mid-to-large-sized hotels. Its transparent pricing aligns well with its extensive feature set and integration capabilities.
For budget-conscious properties or those preferring predictable costs, hub OS’s flat rate offers clarity and ease of budgeting.
Not ideal if:
Breezeway suits niche properties that need property-specific checklists and simple operational oversight.
Not ideal if:
hub OS is optimal for properties seeking a comprehensive, integrated hotel management system built for scale and efficiency.
hub OS and Breezeway tackle different segments and operational scales. Breezeway specializes in short-term rentals, offering property-specific checklists and inspections, but currently has limited recent reviews and support data. Its focus on property management makes it appealing for vacation rental managers but less suited for large hotels.
hub OS, with its robust features, recent extensive reviews, and broad integrations, is the clear choice for mid-to-large hotels aiming to improve efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its focus on automation, real-time data, and cross-department collaboration makes it a dependable solution for complex hotel operations.
If your hotel is a sizable property or resort, hub OS’s proven track record, higher ratings, and comprehensive features make it the best choice. Breezeway remains ideal for small, vacation rental properties prioritizing simplicity and property-specific workflows, but current review data favors hub OS for overall reliability and support.
Os precos de Software de limpeza raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Breezeway (Housekeeping) e hub OS Housekeeping compartilham 13 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API aberta | ||
| Atribuições Automatizadas de Sala | ||
| Atribuições de sala de arrastar e soltar | ||
| Compatível com Android | ||
| Compatível com iOS | ||
| Despacho de solicitação móvel | ||
| Listas de verificação de limpeza | ||
| Listas de verificação personalizáveis por sala | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Perdidos e achados | ||
| Serviços de inspeção remota |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 1 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
O que os hoteleiros adoram
O Hub OS aumenta significativamente a eficiência do gerenciamento de tarefas em departamentos como limpeza, manutenção e recepção. O sistema melhora a... O Hub OS aumenta significativamente a eficiência do gerenciamento de tarefas em departamentos como limpeza, manutenção e recepção. O sistema melhora a comunicação, delegação de tarefas e rastreamento, levando a operações mais simplificadas e maior produtividade. Algumas avaliações, no entanto, apontam para áreas onde recursos adicionais poderiam aprimorar ainda mais o gerenciamento de tarefas.
Embora o Hub OS seja apreciado por sua flexibilidade e capacidades de personalização, vários usuários observam que certas personalizações e configuraç... Embora o Hub OS seja apreciado por sua flexibilidade e capacidades de personalização, vários usuários observam que certas personalizações e configurações personalizadas são desafiadoras de serem alcançadas sem suporte técnico. Há um desejo por mais opções de autoatendimento dentro do software, especialmente relacionadas ao aplicativo móvel e à interface do usuário.
O módulo de limpeza do Hub OS recebe muitos elogios como um divisor de águas, melhorando drasticamente a eficiência e a produtividade. Ele permite que... O módulo de limpeza do Hub OS recebe muitos elogios como um divisor de águas, melhorando drasticamente a eficiência e a produtividade. Ele permite que a equipe veja o status dos quartos, relate problemas prontamente e gerencie tarefas de forma eficaz. Várias avaliações mencionam especificamente que o sistema ajuda a manter altas pontuações de limpeza da limpeza.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
O Hub OS é altamente elogiado por sua integração perfeita com Property Management Systems (PMS), facilitando o gerenciamento de várias operações de ho... O Hub OS é altamente elogiado por sua integração perfeita com Property Management Systems (PMS), facilitando o gerenciamento de várias operações de hotéis, como limpeza e manutenção, de forma eficiente em um só lugar. No entanto, algumas avaliações mencionam atrasos ocasionais e problemas com a sincronização de integrações, especificamente com sistemas como SAP e Opera.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Breezeway (Housekeeping) e hub OS Housekeeping compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Housekeeping Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Breezeway (Housekeeping) oferece 15 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto hub OS Housekeeping oferece 23. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. hub OS Housekeeping lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Breezeway (Housekeeping): Nao. hub OS Housekeeping: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Housekeeping Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Breezeway tem um HT Score de 0 e hub OS tem 34. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos