The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,514 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Canary Technologies se destaca em onboarding — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Network security and Threat lifecycle management.
CheKin se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,514 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $300/mo | From $400/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 1,508 | 6 |
Apos analisar 1,514 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Canary Technologies mais valorizam contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, enquanto os usuarios do CheKin destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Notificações automáticas
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Integração Técnica
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Check-in sem contato para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #2 98 avaliacoes | #9 3 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 1042 avaliacoes | #22 0 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #1 228 avaliacoes | #18 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #1 105 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #1 573 avaliacoes | #21 1 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #1 680 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 116 avaliacoes | #18 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #1 1308 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #3 65 avaliacoes | #9 6 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #1 27 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #2 11 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Canary Contactless Check-In and Chekin hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. Both platforms aim to streamline check-in processes, improve guest experience, and boost revenue, but they diverge in scale, features, and market presence. Canary's extensive review base and recent user feedback make it a more data-backed choice. Which platform better aligns with your hotel's size, guest profile, and technological requirements?
Both Canary Technologies and Chekin aim to eliminate front desk queues, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance guest satisfaction. Canary, with over 1,391 reviews and a 4.68/5 overall rating, offers a well-rounded, highly-rated solution trusted worldwide. Chekin, with only 6 reviews and a 0/5 rating, lacks recent validation and a broad user base, making its effectiveness less certain. So, which platform truly meets modern hotel demands?
If your hotel requires a proven, widely adopted solution with extensive integrations, go with Canary. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and 54 verified partners—including major PMS integrations—make it a reliable choice. Chekin might appeal if you seek a highly customizable, all-in-one system for small-scale operations, especially in Europe; however, the limited reviews and regional presence suggest less maturity. For most hotels seeking confidence, Canary stands out as the safer, more supported option.
Canary boasts a UI rating of 4.82/5 supported by 1,391 reviews, with users praising its quick onboarding and intuitive interface. Chekin scores 4.67/5 with only 6 reviews, but its platform is described as user-friendly and simple, especially for small properties. Yet, Canary’s higher review volume and recent positive feedback give it a slight edge in user-friendliness.
Edge: Canary Contactless Check-In.
Canary offers 26 unique features, including threat lifecycle management, PCI compliance, and network security—features absent in Chekin. Chekin's core strengths lie in guest registration, remote access, and branding customization, but with fewer advanced security options. If your hotel prioritizes robust security and extensive integrations, Canary’s feature set is more comprehensive.
Edge: Canary Contactless Check-In.
Canary’s support rating of 4.69/5 is backed by over 1,300 reviews, with users highlighting quick responses and professional service. Chekin’s support, rated 4.5/5, receives positive remarks but with far fewer reviews, making Canary’s support more reliable and validated across a broader user base.
Edge: Canary Contactless Check-In.
Canary integrates with 54 verified partners, including leading PMS and distribution systems like ROOMRACCOON, SiteMinder, and Oracle Hospitality. Chekin has 20 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Guesty, Lodgify, and Beds24, but its broader ecosystem is less extensive. For seamless operation across diverse systems, Canary’s integration network is superior.
Edge: Canary Contactless Check-In.
Canary’s 4.68/5 rating from 1,391 reviews underscores a high level of satisfaction, especially among independent and branded hotels, with recent reviews confirming its effectiveness. Chekin’s rating of 0/5 from 6 reviews indicates insufficient data and no recent validation—its user satisfaction remains unverified and likely lower.
Edge: Canary Contactless Check-In.
Canary charges a base price of $300, with no freemium, flat monthly, or per-room fees, and no implementation costs. Chekin’s starting price is $400, also with no ongoing fees or trial info available. While Canary’s lower price point and transparent costs favor budget-conscious hotels, both platforms are similarly priced.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Canary Contactless Check-In offers a proven, feature-rich platform supported by a large, recent review base, making it a dependable choice for most hotels. Its extensive integrations, security features, and positive user feedback make it suitable for properties of all sizes wanting a reliable, scalable contactless solution.
Chekin provides a flexible, customizable alternative, particularly appealing to small hotels and vacation rentals with regional focus and a desire for branding. However, with limited reviews and a smaller user base, its effectiveness remains less validated.
If your hotel values proven performance, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction, go with Canary. Conversely, if your operation prioritizes customization and regional flexibility with a smaller tech footprint, Chekin could be worth exploring.
Final recommendation: For most hotels seeking confidence, efficiency, and proven results, Canary Contactless Check-In is the superior choice.
Os precos de Check-in sem contato raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $400/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Canary Contactless Check-In e Chekin compartilham 21 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Auditoria de conformidade PCI | ||
| Gerenciamento do ciclo de vida de ameaças | ||
| Prontidão de conformidade | ||
| Segurança de rede | ||
| Teste de penetração |
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
Embora muitos tenham considerado a plataforma da Canary fácil de usar, vários usuários relataram problemas com a integração com seus Sistemas de Gestã... Embora muitos tenham considerado a plataforma da Canary fácil de usar, vários usuários relataram problemas com a integração com seus Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades (PMS) existentes e sugeriram que melhorias nessa área facilitariam ainda mais as operações.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Canary Contactless Check-In e Chekin compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Contactless Check-in, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Canary Contactless Check-In oferece 54 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Chekin oferece 20. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Canary Contactless Check-In lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.8/5 vs 4.7/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Canary Contactless Check-In: Nao. Chekin: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Contactless Check-in oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Canary Technologies tem um HT Score de 100 e CheKin tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos