The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 42 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
DJUBO se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Housekeeping module and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Visitor se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 42 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 19 | 23 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de Gestão Hoteleira para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) | #31 3 avaliacoes | #37 3 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) | #43 0 avaliacoes | #30 3 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #25 0 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #31 2 avaliacoes | #42 0 avaliacoes |
| Luxo | #31 2 avaliacoes | #33 2 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | #39 0 avaliacoes | #28 2 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | #31 0 avaliacoes | #22 2 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #33 0 avaliacoes | #31 0 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #10 23 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | #10 3 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio | #16 0 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between DJUBO and Visitor hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently—DJUBO consolidates an extensive suite of features into one platform, while Visitor emphasizes simplicity with core functionalities. Your decision should factor in your hotel size, segment, and whether you need advanced integrations or straightforward operation. Are you ready to dive into the finer details to see which suits your team best?
DJUBO, with its 19 recent reviews and a near-perfect overall rating of 5/5, stands out as the more proven and comprehensive option. Visitor, while also highly rated and praised in customer support, has fewer recent reviews (22 total, no reviews in the last six months) and lacks the same level of feature breadth. For most hoteliers looking for a robust, all-in-one platform, DJUBO offers a more reliable choice backed by more recent user feedback.
DJUBO and Visitor both target hotel management, tackling reservation, channel distribution, and guest engagement, but they diverge sharply in scope and complexity. DJUBO integrates a PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office tools, creating a unified environment for larger or multi-property hotels. Visitor focuses on essential functions like bookings, channel management, and guest communication, suitable for smaller or boutique properties.
The main difference is the level of feature depth: DJUBO offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, such as group booking, automated night audits, and digital registration, designed for scalability. Visitor’s 7 unique features include website development, guest CRM, and online checkout, emphasizing ease of use and quick deployment. Do you need a full-stack management system or a straightforward, guest-centric tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management solution capable of handling multi-channel distribution, detailed revenue analysis, and operational automation, DJUBO is the clear winner. Its broad feature set and integrations support complex workflows for independent hotels and groups alike.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, quick setup, and core functionalities such as online bookings and guest management without extensive customization, Visitor fits better. It’s especially ideal for properties like bed & breakfasts, hostels, or budget hotels that value straightforward operations and strong customer service.
Hoteliers with a focus on growth, automation, and detailed reporting should lean toward DJUBO, while those seeking an easy-to-deploy, user-friendly platform for basic needs should opt for Visitor. Which profile aligns with your hotel’s current and future needs?
DJUBO scores a high 4.95/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, real-time updates, and supportive onboarding process. Its comprehensive dashboard consolidates multiple functions, which might initially seem overwhelming but is designed for straightforward navigation once familiar.
Visitor slightly edges out with a 4.91/5 rating, praised for its simplicity, fast setup, and accessible online platform. Customers highlight how intuitive the booking and channel management features are, making onboarding smoother for small teams.
Edge: DJUBO, thanks to its highly rated user experience combined with extensive feature depth, particularly for larger hotels or groups requiring more complex management.
DJUBO offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including group booking engine, automated night audits, guest communication via SMS, digital registration, and integrated CRS. It supports real-time status updates, task management, and ancillary revenue tracking—capabilities that cater to complex, multi-layered hotel operations.
Visitor comes with 7 unique features, such as website development, guest CRM, online checkout, and GDPR compliance, focusing on core operations. While its features cover essential booking and communication needs, it lacks the automation and advanced modules DJUBO provides.
For hotels requiring extensive automation, detailed revenue management, and operational control, DJUBO’s feature set is superior. If your needs are basic, Visitor’s streamlined features may suffice.
Edge: DJUBO, with 20 exclusive features that support scalable, multifaceted hotel management.
DJUBO’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews highlighting its supportive staff and quick issue resolution. Customers mention ongoing upgrades and a responsive onboarding experience, reinforcing confidence in their support system.
Visitor’s reviews, though limited, give it a perfect 5/5 score, with feedback emphasizing friendly, helpful customer service and quick problem-solving. However, the smaller review base means less data to assess consistency.
Edge: DJUBO, due to its larger review count and more recent feedback indicating strong support for hotel teams at all levels.
DJUBO connects with three verified partners, including Tripadvisor, Simplotel, and its own booking platform. These integrations can expand your reach and streamline data flow across channels and platforms.
Visitor currently has no verified integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with other tools or expand its ecosystem. This may challenge hotels that rely on multiple platforms for operations.
Edge: DJUBO, with established partnerships that enhance connectivity and operational flexibility.
DJUBO’s review count (15 in the last six months) and near-perfect overall rating of 5/5 make it the more trusted choice for hoteliers. It is especially popular among independent hotels and multi-property groups, consistently rated highly across segments.
Visitor, with 22 reviews but no recent feedback, receives uniformly positive praise for customer service but lacks the same level of recent validation. Its niche appeal is more prominent among bed & breakfasts and small properties.
Edge: DJUBO, owing to more recent reviews and higher overall ratings among diverse hotel types.
Neither DJUBO nor Visitor provides explicit pricing details; both follow a custom pricing model without freemium options or monthly flat fees. Your hotel will need to contact each provider for tailored quotes.
This lack of transparent pricing emphasizes the importance of evaluating value and features during demos rather than initial costs.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or only needs basic booking and guest management.
Not ideal if your hotel requires automation, advanced revenue management, or extensive reporting features.
DJUBO delivers a comprehensive management experience, suited for hotels aiming to scale or operate multiple properties with complex needs. Its broad feature set, integrations, and recent positive reviews make it a dependable choice for larger or growing hotels.
Visitor offers a simplified, user-friendly platform that works well for small hotels, B&Bs, and properties focused on guest experience over automation. Its high customer service ratings speak to its value for properties valuing simplicity and personal support.
If your hotel demands a full-suite management system with automation and detailed analytics, DJUBO is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is ease of use, quick setup, and core functionalities, Visitor is worth considering.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich solution supported by recent, extensive user reviews, DJUBO stands out as the more reliable, proven option.
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Djubo e Visitor App compartilham 22 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Auditoria noturna automatizada | ||
| Avalie o Módulo de Compras | ||
| CRM para hóspedes | ||
| Desenvolvimento de sites | ||
| Em conformidade com o RGPD | ||
| Faturamento direto | ||
| Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções | ||
| Gráfico de arrastar e soltar | ||
| Motor de reservas de grupo | ||
| Pagamento online | ||
| Relatórios RevPaR e ADR | ||
| Serviço de limpeza |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 15 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Djubo e Visitor App compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel Management Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Djubo oferece 3 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Visitor App oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Djubo lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.9/5 vs 4.9/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Djubo: Nao. Visitor App: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel Management Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. DJUBO tem um HT Score de 0 e Visitor tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos