The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 171 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
DJUBO se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Requests and Online Check-in.
Visual Matrix PMS se destaca quando se trata de technical support challenges , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest Messaging and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 171 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 19 | 152 |
Apos analisar 171 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do DJUBO mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Visual Matrix PMS destacam technical support challenges, interface amigável, comprehensive reporting tools. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface amigável
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Velocidade do sistema e disponibilidade de recursos
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de Gestão Hoteleira para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #31 3 avaliacoes | #18 23 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #43 0 avaliacoes | #2 117 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #11 5 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #25 0 avaliacoes | #16 1 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 2 avaliacoes | #12 38 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #31 2 avaliacoes | #16 17 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #39 0 avaliacoes | #1 124 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #31 0 avaliacoes | #4 44 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #33 0 avaliacoes | #7 141 avaliacoes |
| Europa | — | #32 1 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | #10 3 avaliacoes | #18 2 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | #16 0 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both DJUBO and Visual Matrix PMS aim to streamline your hotel’s daily tasks, but their approaches and strengths differ. DJUBO offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform that consolidates multiple functions, while Visual Matrix PMS specializes in operational efficiency with robust features and integrations. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
DJUBO is a cloud-based, all-in-one platform designed to unify your PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions. It’s built for hotels seeking a centralized system that reduces reliance on multiple disconnected tools, delivering real-time control across operations. Visual Matrix PMS, on the other hand, focuses on optimizing core hotel tasks with an emphasis on automation, staff coordination, and seamless integrations, especially suitable for understaffed properties or those needing quick operational boosts.
The key divergence lies in their scope: DJUBO consolidates many functionalities into one system, while Visual Matrix PMS emphasizes operational speed and ease of use with extensive integrations. DJUBO, with a perfect overall rating of 5/5 and more recent active reviews, clearly demonstrates strong adoption and confidence among hoteliers. Visual Matrix PMS boasts a broader user base, particularly in branded hotels, with a 3.75/5 overall score based on more reviews and a more established presence.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution that reduces complexity, or a specialized PMS that integrates well with existing tools? Your choice depends on your hotel’s scale, staff capacity, and operational priorities.
If your hotel needs a single platform to handle reservations, channel management, POS, revenue, and accounting, DJUBO is the better fit. Its broad feature set, including unique offerings like online check-in and payment requests, makes it appealing for independent hotels and multi-property groups seeking streamlined management.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, staff automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems, Visual Matrix PMS is ideal. Its focus on automation tools like housekeeping, shift planning, and guest messaging—paired with a large partner network—serves understaffed or tech-savvy properties well. For branded hotels looking for a flexible, well-supported platform, Visual Matrix often meets those needs better.
In summary, choose DJUBO when you need a comprehensive, all-in-one management suite. Opt for Visual Matrix PMS if your focus is operational automation, staff coordination, and extensive third-party integrations.
DJUBO scores a remarkable 4.95/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight how quickly staff can adapt to DJUBO, citing the platform's simplicity despite its wide scope, and appreciate its user-friendly design across multiple modules. Training sessions are rated highly, reducing the learning curve for new team members.
Visual Matrix PMS also earns a strong 4.43/5 in usability, with many users citing its familiar interface and ease of navigation. However, some mention that system speed issues and feature bloat can hamper workflows, especially during peak times. Support and onboarding are generally rated well, but the speed limitations are a common concern among users.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 42 features, including unique capabilities like online check-in and payment requests, not available in Visual Matrix PMS. These features support guest self-service and streamlined payments, which are increasingly important in modern hospitality.
Visual Matrix PMS boasts 40 shared features, with 15 additional exclusive functionalities like guest messaging, integrated payment terminals, drag-and-drop tape charts, and guest CRM. Its automation tools, such as shift planning and GDPR compliance, enhance operational control and staff management.
While both systems are rich in features, DJUBO’s unique offerings around payments and check-in give it a slight edge for properties focused on guest experience. Visual Matrix PMS’s automation and extensive integrations make it a strong choice for operational efficiency.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO is rated 4.76/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing its supportive staff and ongoing upgrades. One reviewer highlighted, “The support team is always available and very professional,” reflecting its strong reputation for responsiveness.
Visual Matrix PMS has a support rating of 4.34/5, with users appreciating knowledgeable tech support and helpful weekly tips. Some reviewers mention occasional difficulties in reaching support quickly during critical moments, but overall, support is considered reliable.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO features 3 verified integration partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but its ecosystem is relatively limited. This might restrict your ability to connect with specialized third-party tools if your hotel requires extensive custom integrations.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 23 verified partners, including Hotel Investor Apps, SiteMinder, SkyTouch, and LaaSie.ai. Its broader ecosystem allows more flexible connections with booking engines, POS systems, and revenue tools, making it suitable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
DJUBO has a higher review count (19 reviews), with an outstanding overall rating of 5/5 and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, comprehensive features, and excellent support, especially in the last six months.
Visual Matrix PMS, with 143 reviews and a 3.75/5 rating, has a more extensive history of user feedback. Its recent reviews highlight its operational strengths but also point to speed issues and some missing functionalities. Its higher review volume suggests a mature product with steady user experience.
Considering recency and scores, DJUBO’s reviews lend it a significant edge for current hotelier confidence.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly list specific pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. It operates on a subscription model without a free tier or trial, making its cost structure less transparent upfront.
Visual Matrix PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no free trial or tier, and no mention of additional costs. Pricing appears straightforward but may be prohibitive for smaller properties or those seeking flexible plans.
In absence of clear, comparable data, your best bet is to request quotes directly from vendors to assess value based on your hotel’s requirements.
Not ideal if you require extensive third-party integrations or highly specialized billing features. Smaller boutique hotels might find DJUBO’s comprehensive approach too broad or costly.
Not ideal if speed and system responsiveness are critical during peak times or if your property relies heavily on advanced billing functionalities absent in the platform.
DJUBO stands out as a highly rated, all-in-one platform with a perfect review score and recent positive feedback. It suits independent hotels and multi-property groups that want unified control over their operations without juggling multiple tools.
Visual Matrix PMS excels in operational automation, extensive integrations, and support for understaffed hotels. Its broad feature set and established presence make it ideal for branded hotels and properties seeking a flexible, automation-driven system.
If simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive functionality are your priorities, DJUBO is the clear choice. If your focus is on operational efficiency, automation, and extensive third-party connections, Visual Matrix PMS will serve you better.
For most hotels actively evaluating these options today, DJUBO’s more recent reviews and higher satisfaction ratings position it as the more reliable and scalable solution.
Os precos de Software de Gestão Hoteleira raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Djubo e Visual Matrix PMS compartilham 40 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Check-in online | ||
| Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções | ||
| Gráfico de arrastar e soltar | ||
| Mensagens centralizadas | ||
| Mensagens para convidados | ||
| Mensagens para funcionários | ||
| Solicitações de pagamento | ||
| Terminal de Pagamento e Leitor de Cartão Integrados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 5 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
O design intuitivo do Visual Matrix reduz a curva de aprendizado, tornando-o acessível para novos contratados. No entanto, alguns usuários relatam dif... O design intuitivo do Visual Matrix reduz a curva de aprendizado, tornando-o acessível para novos contratados. No entanto, alguns usuários relatam dificuldades iniciais na transição de outros sistemas.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Djubo e Visual Matrix PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel Management Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Djubo oferece 3 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Visual Matrix PMS oferece 23. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Djubo lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.9/5 vs 4.4/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Djubo: Nao. Visual Matrix PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel Management Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. DJUBO tem um HT Score de 0 e Visual Matrix PMS tem 80. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos