The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
DOWHAT se destaca .
SiteMinder se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.3/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Performance Reporting and Mobile optimized/responsive.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 1,332 |
Apos analisar 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do DOWHAT mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do SiteMinder destacam channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, desafios no suporte ao cliente. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #45 0 avaliacoes | #1 470 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #45 0 avaliacoes | #1 527 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #39 0 avaliacoes | #1 96 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #30 0 avaliacoes | #1 50 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #46 0 avaliacoes | #1 564 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #42 0 avaliacoes | #1 411 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #42 0 avaliacoes | #1 230 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #36 0 avaliacoes | #1 174 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #42 0 avaliacoes | #2 157 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #5 266 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #32 0 avaliacoes | #1 418 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #3 13 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Booking Engine by DOWHAT and SiteMinder's Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and strategic priorities. Both aim to streamline reservations and increase direct bookings, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. DOWHAT’s booking engine is a newcomer with no reviews or recent data, while SiteMinder’s platform is well-established, with over 1,200 reviews and recent performance metrics. Given the stark contrast, the decision should lean heavily toward the product with current, robust user feedback.
DOWHAT’s booking engine is very new, with no reviews or recent user feedback to gauge real-world performance, reliability, or support quality. In contrast, SiteMinder’s platform boasts a 4.48/5 overall rating based on over 1,200 reviews, with recent feedback from 72 users in the last six months, reflecting ongoing updates and user satisfaction. SiteMinder’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it the more trustworthy choice for today’s hotelier.
Both products aim to optimize online reservations, but SiteMinder offers a comprehensive array of features, integrations, and a global presence that DOWHAT currently cannot match. If your hotel values proven reliability, a mature ecosystem, and extensive support, SiteMinder is the clear leader. Do you want to risk untested technology, or prefer a platform with recent, high-quality feedback confirming its effectiveness?
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich booking engine with proven support, go with SiteMinder. Its large user base and recent reviews underscore its stability, ease of use, and extensive integrations across multiple channels and PMS systems. For hotels looking to expand distribution and improve operational efficiency with a trusted platform, SiteMinder is the safer, more scalable choice.
Conversely, if your team is open to testing new technology and your primary concern is cutting-edge innovation without current user feedback, DOWHAT might be tempting. But given its lack of reviews, support data, or recent updates, it’s a high-risk option. For a decision rooted in confidence and proven performance, SiteMinder is the clear recommendation.
SiteMinder’s interface receives a 4.6/5 ease of use rating, with many users praising its intuitive setup, straightforward navigation, and quick onboarding process. Reviewers highlight its user-friendliness even for staff with limited tech experience, along with clear documentation and support.
DOWHAT’s booking engine, however, has no reviews or ratings available, leaving its usability and onboarding quality completely unverified. While AI descriptions suggest a simple interface, the absence of user feedback makes it impossible to gauge real-world user satisfaction. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s booking engine offers 39 features across various categories, including room & rate filtering, performance reporting, rate intelligence, multi-currency support, PMS connectivity, and automation tools like pre-stay and post-stay emails. These features cater to large and small hotels seeking detailed control and insights.
DOWHAT’s booking engine appears to lack any listed features beyond basic booking functionalities, with no public information on advanced tools or integrations. The feature gap is significant, especially for hotels aiming for sophisticated revenue management or multi-channel distribution. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s customer support scores 4.43/5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness, multilingual support, and helpful onboarding. Notably, clients like Hotel Amicizia and Hotel Graf Bentinck report improved efficiency and fewer manual errors thanks to reliable support.
DOWHAT’s support quality cannot be assessed, as it has no reviews or customer feedback available. The absence of data raises questions about its responsiveness, onboarding, and ongoing assistance. For dependable support, SiteMinder clearly leads. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder provides integrations with over 245 verified partners, including major PMS systems, channel managers, and booking platforms like Oracle Hospitality, Duve, and others. Its open API and extensive partner network enable hotels to connect seamlessly with existing systems and expand distribution.
DOWHAT’s platform has only 2 verified partners, with one shared integration (Oracle Hospitality). The limited connectivity suggests fewer options for expanding or customizing your hotel’s tech ecosystem. For scalability and flexibility, SiteMinder offers the superior integration capability. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s overall rating of 4.48/5 across 1,207 reviews makes it the most highly-rated choice. Recent reviews emphasize its stability, ease of use, and ability to increase direct bookings, especially among boutique, city center, and resort hotels.
DOWHAT has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Without recent, verified feedback, hoteliers should favor SiteMinder’s proven track record. Edge: SiteMinder.
DOWHAT’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating either a lack of transparent pricing or a nascent product. This obscurity complicates value assessment and budget planning.
SiteMinder charges a base fee of $500 monthly, with no additional implementation or per-room fees. This predictable structure allows hotels to budget effectively. Given the lack of transparent pricing for DOWHAT, SiteMinder offers clearer value for investment.
Hotels that are experimental, early adopters, or operating on very tight budgets might consider DOWHAT, especially if they want to test new technology without significant upfront costs. It could be suitable for small, independent hotels or vacation rentals looking for basic booking capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust features, reliable support, or integration with multiple channels. Larger, revenue-focused hotels that depend on proven technology should avoid DOWHAT until it demonstrates stability and feature maturity through user feedback.
Hotels seeking a proven, scalable, and feature-rich booking engine should choose SiteMinder. It is ideal for independent boutique hotels, resorts, and city hotels that need extensive distribution control, detailed analytics, and seamless PMS integration.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget or requires a simple booking system without extensive features. Small properties with minimal distribution needs or those preferring a DIY approach might find SiteMinder’s cost and complexity overwhelming.
The core difference between the two products is maturity and proven performance. SiteMinder’s booking engine has a long track record, extensive features, and highly positive recent reviews, making it the more dependable choice today.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich system with global distribution, robust support, and proven scalability, choose SiteMinder. Its extensive integrations and customer satisfaction ratings make it a particularly strong candidate for most mid-sized and larger hotels.
However, if you are willing to take a risk on an untested platform, and your priorities are experimentation or niche use cases, DOWHAT’s offering might be worth exploring—though it’s important to note the current lack of evidence supporting its performance.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for stability, growth, and confidence in their online booking operations, SiteMinder’s booking engine stands out as the smarter, more secure investment today.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Booking Engine by DOWHAT e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API aberta | ||
| Comparação da tarifa do quarto | ||
| Filtragem de tipo de quarto e tarifa | ||
| Filtros de compras de taxa rápida | ||
| Relatório de desempenho | ||
| Taxa de inteligência |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 27 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Booking Engine by DOWHAT e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Booking Engine by DOWHAT oferece 2 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto SiteMinder Booking Engine oferece 245. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. SiteMinder Booking Engine lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Booking Engine by DOWHAT: Nao. SiteMinder Booking Engine: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. DOWHAT tem um HT Score de 0 e SiteMinder tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos