The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 128 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
eRevMax se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.7/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como PMS connectivity and Analytics dashboard.
MaxiMojo se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 128 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 128 | 0 |
Apos analisar 128 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do eRevMax mais valorizam equipe de suporte, eficiência operacional, paridade de taxas, enquanto os usuarios do MaxiMojo destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Equipe de suporte
▾
|
|
|
+
Eficiência Operacional
▾
|
|
|
+
Paridade de taxas
▾
|
|
|
+
Análise e relatórios
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Problemas técnicos
▾
|
|
|
−
Análise e relatórios
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Gerentes de Canal para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #17 21 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #8 59 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #5 35 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #10 5 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 52 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #7 55 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #7 35 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #8 18 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #9 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #9 40 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 14 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #3 42 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between RateTiger Channel Manager by eRevMax and MaxiMojo hinges on your hotel’s specific needs—whether you prioritize extensive connectivity and proven reliability or an integrated property management approach. RateTiger has established itself as a leading channel management solution, widely used and highly rated, whereas MaxiMojo offers an all-in-one PMS and revenue management platform with limited reviews and fewer integrations. Both aim to streamline operations, but their core strengths vary significantly.
RateTiger by eRevMax is a well-known, mature product with a strong global presence and a large user base, while MaxiMojo is relatively new with a focus on AI-driven insights and simplified operations. Your decision should be based on whether you want a dedicated channel manager with extensive partner networks and proven performance or an integrated system that combines PMS and revenue management. Are you ready to prioritize connectivity or an all-encompassing management platform?
RateTiger offers an extensive suite of features tailored for hotels seeking to optimize online distribution, such as real-time updates, rate parity, and a comprehensive analytics dashboard. It works with over 70 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and Agoda, making its reach highly dependable for large or multi-channel hotels. MaxiMojo, in contrast, provides a more limited partner network—only 3 verified integrations—focusing on European and Asia-Pacific markets, and lacks the broad industry reputation RateTiger has built.
RateTiger’s reviews highlight its reliability, real-time synchronization, and ease of integration, with 115 reviews and a 4.7/5 overall rating. MaxiMojo’s absence of recent reviews and zero rating suggest less proven performance and less trust among hoteliers. If your hotel depends heavily on multi-channel distribution and proven tools, RateTiger is the clear leader. Are you comfortable with a newer, less-tested platform like MaxiMojo, or do you want the industry’s most trusted, established solution?
If your hotel needs a dedicated channel management system with a proven track record, go with RateTiger. It’s ideal for hotels of all sizes looking for reliable connectivity with a wide partner network, advanced rate management, and detailed analytics. Conversely, if your hotel is small, operates primarily in Europe or Asia-Pacific, and wants an integrated platform that combines PMS and revenue management, MaxiMojo might seem appealing, though its limited reviews and integrations raise questions about its maturity.
RateTiger’s strengths lie in its extensive global presence, real-time updates, and high customer satisfaction—rated 4.7/5 from 115 recent reviews. MaxiMojo’s focus on AI-powered insights and integrated management makes it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution, but with little verified performance data, it remains a less proven choice. Ultimately, if reliability and proven ROI matter most, RateTiger is the safer bet; if innovation and integration are your priorities, MaxiMojo may be worth exploring cautiously.
RateTiger’s user interface scores 4.39/5 based on reviews, and users praise its ease of establishing connectivity, with many describing onboarding as “fast” and “intuitive.” The platform’s learning curve appears manageable, supported by onboarding ratings of 4.46/5, though some users note the interface could be updated for modern aesthetics. Support quality is rated 4.61/5, with reviews emphasizing responsive assistance, though some mention occasional delays.
MaxiMojo’s interface and usability are not well-documented in recent reviews, and with zero reviews available, it’s impossible to assess its user-friendliness. Given RateTiger’s high ratings and established reputation, it clearly provides a more reliable and familiar user experience. Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger offers a suite of 10 exclusive features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-currency support, and multi-lingual operation. It also supports unlimited channels, bulk updates, and derived rates, giving your team extensive control over distribution and pricing strategies. MaxiMojo, on the other hand, has no listed unique features or detailed technical capabilities, which suggests its feature set may be limited or less detailed.
With a proven set of features tailored to channel management and revenue optimization, RateTiger’s capabilities support complex hotel operations and large portfolios. MaxiMojo’s lack of detailed feature information and no exclusive offerings make it less appealing for hotels needing advanced management tools. Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s support team is rated 4.61/5, with reviews describing their responsiveness as “very efficient” and “helpful,” though some call for quicker response times. Customers appreciate the support’s professionalism, but a few mention delays during peak times. MaxiMojo has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support reputation unverified.
Given RateTiger’s extensive review history and higher support ratings, your team is more likely to experience reliable assistance when needed. MaxiMojo’s support quality remains unknown, which introduces risk for hotels requiring prompt help. Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s 115 recent reviews and a 4.7/5 overall score demonstrate strong satisfaction across hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Its ratings are consistent, and reviewers frequently praise its reliability and ease of use. MaxiMojo, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no data on user satisfaction—the platform’s reputation remains unverified.
Since recent reviews confirm RateTiger’s high satisfaction levels and recommendation rate of 90%, it clearly leads in hotel ratings. The absence of feedback for MaxiMojo makes it difficult to assess its standing. Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger does not publicly display its pricing structure, but it is known to operate on a custom quote basis, typically reflecting the size of your property and distribution needs. It is not a freemium product, and no implementation or monthly fees are listed publicly. MaxiMojo’s pricing details are also unavailable, and without transparent costs, assessing value is challenging.
Given RateTiger’s established market presence and extensive features, its pricing likely reflects its premium status. MaxiMojo’s lack of available pricing may suggest it is still in development or targeting smaller hotels with different models. For your hotel, budget transparency and value-for-money are crucial—RateTiger’s reputation suggests it’s a worthwhile investment if your budget allows.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, local, or operates solely in a single market with minimal distribution needs. Also, not ideal if your team prefers a simple, all-in-one platform without dedicated channel management features.
Not ideal if your property requires large-scale distribution, extensive channel partnerships, or proven reliability backed by large user reviews. Also, not suitable for hotels needing robust technical support or those in markets outside Europe and Asia-Pacific, where MaxiMojo’s presence is minimal.
RateTiger’s core strength lies in its extensive, proven connectivity and high customer satisfaction. With thousands of hotels worldwide and a broad partner network, it reliably streamlines multi-channel distribution and revenue management. MaxiMojo, while promising with AI-driven features and integrated management, has limited peer reviews and fewer integrations, making its effectiveness uncertain.
Choose RateTiger if you need a trusted, battle-tested channel manager capable of supporting complex distribution demands. Opt for MaxiMojo if your hotel operates in its targeted markets and you value an integrated platform, but be cautious given the limited user feedback and verification.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking proven performance and extensive global reach, RateTiger offers a safer, more reliable choice. MaxiMojo may appeal to smaller properties or those willing to experiment with newer technology, but it currently lacks the backing of substantial reviews and verified performance data.
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) e MaxiMojo compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conectividade PMS | ||
| Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções | ||
| Gestão de inventário | ||
| Integrações bidirecionais em tempo real | ||
| Painel de análise | ||
| Suporte a várias moedas |
Analisamos 2 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Embora a equipe de suporte do produto receba feedback geral positivo, alguns usuários sugerem melhorias para resolução mais rápida de problemas e disp... Embora a equipe de suporte do produto receba feedback geral positivo, alguns usuários sugerem melhorias para resolução mais rápida de problemas e disponibilidade consistente.
A integração entre o Booking Engine e o Channel Manager do eRevMax melhorou a eficiência operacional ao otimizar os processos de reserva.
Manter a paridade de tarifas entre todas as OTAs é considerado um benefício significativo, garantindo que os hóspedes vejam preços consistentes indepe... Manter a paridade de tarifas entre todas as OTAs é considerado um benefício significativo, garantindo que os hóspedes vejam preços consistentes independentemente da plataforma de reserva, o que aumenta a confiança e potencialmente as taxas de ocupação.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
As avaliações mencionam problemas técnicos recorrentes, como problemas de sincronização e falhas de atualização de disponibilidade, embora os usuários... As avaliações mencionam problemas técnicos recorrentes, como problemas de sincronização e falhas de atualização de disponibilidade, embora os usuários reconheçam que o suporte é rápido para lidar com esses casos.
As ferramentas abrangentes de relatórios e análises são elogiadas por fornecer insights valiosos sobre tendências de reservas, permitindo que os hotéi... As ferramentas abrangentes de relatórios e análises são elogiadas por fornecer insights valiosos sobre tendências de reservas, permitindo que os hotéis tomem decisões baseadas em dados para maximizar a receita e otimizar estratégias.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) e MaxiMojo compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Channel Managers, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) oferece 70 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto MaxiMojo oferece 3. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax): Nao. MaxiMojo: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Channel Managers oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. eRevMax tem um HT Score de 67 e MaxiMojo tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos