FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access vs. Salto:
Qual e o Ideal para Voce?

The Decision

Choosing between FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access and SALTO Systems for your hotel’s keyless entry hinges on your operational priorities and experience expectations. Both address the need for contactless, secure access, but they diverge significantly in user feedback, system reliability, and feature depth. FLEXIPASS, with its high review count and recent positive ratings, is clearly the more trusted option. But which solution truly fits your hotel's unique needs?

Is FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access or SALTO Systems Better for Hotels?

Both products aim to modernize room access through keyless technology, reducing reliance on physical keys and enhancing guest safety. FLEXIPASS primarily focuses on simple integration, user-friendliness, and rapid deployment, making it ideal for hotels seeking quick results. SALTO, in contrast, offers a comprehensive, hardware-heavy approach with advanced security features but suffers from mixed reviews on support and reliability.

While FLEXIPASS’s reviews highlight high satisfaction with ease of use and customer service, SALTO’s feedback centers around frequent technical failures and support issues. Are you comfortable with a system that has proven stability and positive recent feedback, or do you prefer a more traditional, security-heavy approach that may come with support challenges?

FLEXIPASS vs SALTO: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel values a straightforward, quick-to-implement solution with a high satisfaction rate, go with FLEXIPASS. Its 33 reviews and 4.9/5 overall rating, including a 9.12/5 NPS score, showcase strong recent performance and high customer recommendation. On the other hand, SALTO’s 6 reviews and 2/5 rating, with some guests reporting multiple lock failures and poor support, suggest caution.

For boutique hotels, serviced apartments, and properties prioritizing guest convenience and operational simplicity, FLEXIPASS’s approach is ideal. If your hotel requires extensive security features, custom hardware, or has already invested heavily in SALTO’s ecosystem, then SALTO might be worth considering — but only if you’re prepared for potential support headaches.

Is FLEXIPASS or SALTO Easier to Use?

FLEXIPASS scores an impressive 4.65/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its user-friendly interface and simple onboarding process. Users report that both staff and guests find the mobile app intuitive, which helps reduce training time and accelerates staff adoption. Support ratings of 4.73/5 further reinforce its ease of support and troubleshooting.

SALTO, however, scores a low 2.58/5 for ease of use, with reviews citing frequent lock malfunctions, complex hardware, and support that leaves much to be desired. Guests faced issues with lock responsiveness, and staff struggled with system reliability, which diminishes confidence.

Edge: FLEXIPASS.

Which Has Better Features: FLEXIPASS or SALTO?

FLEXIPASS offers 8 core features, including whitelabeling, notifications, and a developer SDK—capabilities that support customization and integration flexibility. It also connects with more than 30 verified partners, broadening its compatibility with PMS, guest apps, and communication systems.

SALTO provides extensive hardware options and a highly integrated access control ecosystem, but it lacks dedicated features like notifications or SDKs, relying more on traditional lock hardware. Its features focus on physical security and networked systems, but reviews suggest these features are less reliable in practice.

Edge: FLEXIPASS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: FLEXIPASS or SALTO?

Customer support is a strength for FLEXIPASS, with a 4.73/5 rating and reviews praising quick responses, professional assistance, and proactive problem solving. Many hoteliers highlight the responsiveness of Patrick and his team as a key benefit, especially when integrating new systems.

In contrast, SALTO’s support scores a disappointing 1.5/5, with reviews describing support as unresponsive, support staff as unhelpful, and frequent lock failures that require extensive troubleshooting. The hotel staff’s frustration with SALTO’s support directly impacts guest satisfaction and system reliability.

Edge: FLEXIPASS.

Which Has More Integrations: FLEXIPASS or SALTO?

FLEXIPASS boasts 31 verified partners, including popular PMS systems like Cloudbeds, RoomRaccoon, and Booking Factory, plus integrations with guest communication providers like Whistle and HelloShift. This extensive network facilitates smooth operation across various hotel management platforms.

SALTO’s 36 verified partners include many hardware and system integrators like Oracle Hospitality and Stayntouch, emphasizing its hardware-centric approach. While it has more total partners, many are focused on hardware integration rather than PMS or guest experience platforms.

Edge: SALTO, but FLEXIPASS offers broader hotel management system integrations.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: FLEXIPASS or SALTO?

Based on recent reviews, FLEXIPASS receives a 4.9/5 overall rating, with 94% likelihood to recommend, and a strong focus on boutique, independent, and serviced apartments. Its recent review volume and high ratings make it the preferred choice for most hoteliers.

SALTO’s reviews are limited and negative, with some rating as low as 0.5/5 due to lock failures and poor support. No recent high scores support SALTO as a reliable or recommended choice currently.

Edge: FLEXIPASS.

How Much Do FLEXIPASS and SALTO Cost?

Pricing details are scarce or unavailable for both. FLEXIPASS does not list explicit prices but operates on a per-hotel basis, with a pay-as-you-go model via monthly fees, while SALTO typically involves hardware purchase and licensing fees that can be costly. Given the limited data, cost-effectiveness favors FLEXIPASS, especially with its high ROI score.

What Type of Hotel Should Use FLEXIPASS?

• Hotels seeking quick deployment of contactless, mobile keys.
• Boutique hotels and independent properties prioritizing guest experience.
• Hotels with limited IT support, needing an easy-to-manage system.
• Properties aiming to reduce costs related to physical keys.
• Hotels that want flexibility with integrations and future scalability.

Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on traditional hardware or requires extensive physical security features not supported by mobile access.

What Type of Hotel Should Use SALTO?

• Large hotels or resorts with existing SALTO infrastructure.
• Hotels requiring high-security hardware solutions.
• Properties with established relationships with SALTO hardware vendors.
• Hotels with dedicated IT teams prepared for complex hardware management.
• Facilities prioritizing physical access control over guest experience innovations.

Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or heavily reliant on seamless, mobile-first solutions, especially given recent support issues.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

FLEXIPASS and SALTO serve very different hotel needs. FLEXIPASS excels in ease of use, recent positive reviews, and quick deployment, making it the logical choice for most modern hotels. SALTO’s hardware-centric approach appeals to properties seeking high-security physical access, but recent support issues and poor ratings diminish its appeal.

Choose FLEXIPASS if your focus is on guest convenience, operational simplicity, and reliable support. Opt for SALTO only if your hotel’s security needs demand high-end hardware and your team is equipped to handle complex systems that may not be well-supported currently.

In conclusion, the clear winner based on current reviews, recent performance, and customer satisfaction is FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access. Its high review count, ratings, and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more reliable choice for today’s hotelier.