The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 26 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Folio se destaca em ease of use and customer support .
roommaster se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 26 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 3 | 23 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de processamento de pagamentos para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 6 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 7 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | #4 3 avaliacoes | #4 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | — | #4 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avaliacoes |
| Luxo | #5 1 avaliacoes | #5 0 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | #5 2 avaliacoes | #4 1 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #4 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #5 3 avaliacoes | #4 14 avaliacoes |
| Europa | — | #5 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #3 0 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Folio Pay by Folio and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Folio Pay offers a modern, cloud-based solution focused on streamlining supplier payments and maximizing rebates, while roommaster Payments emphasizes seamless integration within your PMS to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and operational workflows. As a hotelier, your decision should reflect whether you prioritize financial control and cashback incentives or integrated operational efficiency.
Both products aim to improve payment workflows, but their core approaches diverge. Folio Pay’s strength lies in transforming accounts payable into a strategic financial tool with rebates, whereas roommaster Payments emphasizes reducing manual effort and chargebacks through tight integration. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Folio Pay and roommaster Payments are designed to address different hotel payment challenges. Folio Pay is ideal if your hotel needs a comprehensive platform to manage supplier payments, improve cash flow, and earn rebates—especially if you’re looking to modernize your accounts payable process. Conversely, roommaster Payments targets hotels seeking to streamline internal payment workflows within their existing property management system, with a focus on deposits, pre-authorizations, and reducing manual labor.
Folio Pay’s cloud-based nature offers greater flexibility, with an all-in-one payment hub that consolidates scheduling and execution of supplier payments, supported by features like ACH transfers and Mastercard® prepaid options. Roommaster Payments, on the other hand, emphasizes operational integration, automating deposits and pre-authorizations directly within your PMS, which can be crucial for daily hotel operations.
The reviews reveal that Folio Pay's recent updates and high customer satisfaction—rated 5/5 for ease of use and support—make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking financial control. Roommaster’s mixed reviews about system outages and support issues suggest that while it’s feature-rich, it may face stability challenges.
Are your hotel’s core needs financial management and rebates, or operational efficiency and system stability?
If your hotel prioritizes strategic financial management, cash rebates, and modern supplier payment workflows, Folio Pay is the clear choice. Its recent review count of 3, all within the last six months, coupled with a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend, indicates strong current confidence among users.
For hotels that require an integrated payments solution primarily to handle deposits, pre-authorizations, and reduce manual processing within their PMS, roommaster Payments is suitable. However, it has a limited review base—20 reviews, with only 9 recent ones—and a slightly lower likelihood to recommend at 89%. Its more extensive feature set (13 features exclusive to it) makes it attractive for hotels with complex payment needs but also exposes it to potential stability issues noted in user feedback.
Your decision hinges on whether you need a modern, rebate-optimized platform (Folio Pay) or a tightly integrated operational tool (roommaster Payments).
Folio Pay earns a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, supported by recent reviews praising its straightforward interface and intuitive workflows. Users highlight that “it’s an excellent tool” and “easy to purchase,” with onboarding rated 5/5, indicating quick adoption and minimal training hurdles.
Roommaster Payments scores 4.4/5, with reviews citing its ease of use but noting glitches during busy periods and some frustrations with system outages. Support staff are praised for helpfulness, but the overall user experience is marred by instability and slower workflows.
Edge: Folio Pay.
Folio Pay’s core offering is its all-in-one payment hub, with no additional features listed beyond payment processing. In contrast, roommaster Payments boasts 13 exclusive features, including authorization adjustments, refund management, contactless payments, tokenization, and PCI compliance—crucial for hotels requiring diverse payment options.
While Folio Pay excels in cash rebates and supplier payment control, roommaster Payments offers advanced features for deposit handling, chargeback management, and in-system payment splitting. Given the feature count and recent positive reviews, roommaster Payments has a slight edge for hotels seeking operational depth.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Folio Pay’s reviews indicate a perfect 5/5 support rating, with comments like “support is great” and “they answer calls promptly.” The recent review count (3) suggests current positive experiences and high satisfaction.
roommaster Payments has a support rating of 4.45/5, with feedback pointing to helpful staff but also frustrations over outages and inconsistent issue resolution. The larger review base (20 reviews, with some highlighting system errors and slow support during outages) indicates lower overall confidence.
Edge: Folio Pay.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major hospitality technology providers such as Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia. This extensive network makes it suitable for hotels needing diverse third-party integrations within their PMS environment.
Folio Pay, with zero verified integrations, appears more standalone and less flexible if your hotel relies heavily on external systems. If seamless integration is a priority, roommaster Payments clearly leads.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Folio Pay, with only 3 recent reviews, has a perfect 100% likelihood to recommend from all reviewers, suggesting high satisfaction when it is used. However, the limited review count makes this less conclusive.
roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews and an 89% likelihood to recommend, shows generally positive feedback but some frustrations with outages, stability, and support. Given the recent reviews, Folio Pay’s higher recent confidence makes it the stronger rated product currently.
Edge: Folio Pay.
Folio Pay’s pricing details are not publicly available, indicating it may follow a custom quote model suited to larger enterprise clients or those with significant supplier payment needs. No free trial or flat rate info is provided.
roommaster Payments charges a flat fee of $300/month, with no mention of tiered pricing. This straightforward pricing makes it easy to budget for, though it may be costly for smaller hotels relying on fewer transactions.
Folio Pay’s lack of transparent pricing suggests it’s aimed at hotels with higher transaction volumes or complex financial needs, while roommaster Payments offers predictable costs for operational integration.
The core difference is that Folio Pay emphasizes financial rewards and strategic accounts payable management, while roommaster Payments focuses on operational transaction efficiency within the PMS. Folio Pay, with a recent surge of reviews and perfect support ratings, offers a more current and reliable solution for hotels looking to modernize their financial workflows.
Choose Folio Pay if your hotel seeks rebates, transparent control over supplier payments, and a cloud-based, easy-to-use platform. Opt for roommaster Payments if your hotel needs comprehensive in-system payment features, extensive integrations, and a solution embedded within daily operations.
In conclusion, for hotels that want a modern, well-reviewed, and highly supported payment platform, Folio Pay stands out as the preferable choice. However, if your hotel’s primary focus is operational depth, integration, and automation, roommaster Payments remains a solid, feature-rich option—though with some caveats about stability and support.
Os precos de Software de processamento de pagamentos raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Folio Pay e roommaster Payments compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aceita Visa | ||
| Ajustes de autorização | ||
| Captura Parcial | ||
| Função Gratuidade | ||
| Gestão de reembolso | ||
| Pague por Link |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 1 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Folio Pay e roommaster Payments compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Payments Processing Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Folio Pay oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto roommaster Payments oferece 56. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Folio Pay lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.2/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Folio Pay: Nao. roommaster Payments: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Payments Processing Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Folio tem um HT Score de 0 e roommaster tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos