The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 550 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Hilton se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 550 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 1 | 549 |
Apos analisar 550 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Hilton mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #60 1 avaliacoes | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #52 0 avaliacoes | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #60 1 avaliacoes | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #56 1 avaliacoes | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #40 1 avaliacoes | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel can dramatically impact operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Hilton OnQ, a proprietary system built in-house, has been the standard for Hilton’s vast network of over 2,000 properties but struggles with outdated technology and limited recent reviews. Conversely, HotelTime PMS boasts a strong recent review presence, a higher overall rating, and a broad feature set. Which system truly aligns with your hotel’s needs?
The decision ultimately hinges on the scale and needs of your property, your expectations for modern features, and your support requirements. Let’s explore how each compares across critical factors.
Hilton OnQ is designed specifically for Hilton’s brand, offering integration within their ecosystem. Yet, its reviews reveal a significant dissatisfaction around outdated technology, with recent reviews nearly nonexistent. HotelTime PMS, on the other hand, has a 4.83/5 rating based on 433 reviews, with 27 recent ratings in the last six months, showing active user feedback.
The core problem both aim to solve involves streamlining operations—reservations, check-ins, billing, and guest data management. Hilton’s system appears to lack innovation, with users calling it “obsolete techno,” while HotelTime is praised for its real-time data, automation, and extensive integrations. Do you prioritize an industry-specific solution or a modern, flexible platform?
If your hotel is part of Hilton’s global brand or operates within their franchise infrastructure, Hilton OnQ might seem like an obvious choice. However, given the lack of recent reviews, poor ratings (0/5 overall), and consistent complaints about outdated tech, it’s clear Hilton OnQ is not keeping pace with modern hotel management needs.
HotelTime PMS suits properties seeking a flexible, cloud-based platform with extensive features, proven scalability, and recent positive feedback. If your hotel wants a comprehensive solution with active support and broad integrations, HotelTime is the clear choice. For boutique or independent hotels, HotelTime’s versatility and ongoing innovation make it the superior solution.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and daily efficiency. Hilton OnQ scores a dismal 1/5 for user-friendliness, with reviews noting the system’s obsolete interface and difficulties managing even basic tasks. Staff spend hours troubleshooting, rather than serving guests.
HotelTime PMS, rated 4.66/5, is praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and management-friendly features. Users say it’s “simple, clear, and easy to learn,” facilitating faster staff training and smoother daily operations. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ offers only basic, proprietary features designed for Hilton properties, with no unique features highlighted. In contrast, HotelTime provides 51 exclusive features such as integrated POS, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, revenue management, and automation tools—features that significantly enhance operational efficiency and guest experience.
HotelTime’s extensive feature set, including real-time reporting, automated night audit, and multi-currency support, makes it a stand-out choice. With more than fifty features uniquely available, HotelTime clearly leads in capability. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton’s support is reported to be lacking, with a rating of 1/5 and reviews emphasizing long hours spent troubleshooting due to poor interface and outdated infrastructure. Complaints include support delays and inability to address core issues effectively.
HotelTime’s support scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick, responsive service and dedicated onboarding assistance. Clients appreciate their consistent availability and proactive communication. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ integrates with six verified partners, mostly limited to Hilton’s internal ecosystem and a few third-party vendors like Canary Technologies. Its integration scope is narrow, reflecting its closed, proprietary architecture.
HotelTime PMS offers 58 verified integrations, including popular tools like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, along with core partners like Canary Technologies. Its extensive third-party connectivity supports a more flexible tech stack. Edge: HotelTime.
Given the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, Hilton OnQ is rated poorly overall and is virtually unreviewed in the last six months. Conversely, HotelTime’s recent reviews (27 in six months) and 4.83/5 score reflect high satisfaction, especially among properties in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia-Pacific.
HotelTime’s users—ranging from boutique hotels to resorts—report improved operational efficiency and management. Its higher, recent review volume makes it the more trusted choice. Edge: HotelTime.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely due to its exclusive use within Hilton properties. This limits direct hotelier access and makes comparison impossible.
HotelTime PMS charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no implementation or setup fees. As a fully cloud-based platform, its transparent pricing makes it accessible across various property sizes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hilton OnQ is a closed, proprietary system tied exclusively to Hilton properties, with outdated technology and very limited recent reviews. Its lack of features and poor user ratings make it unsuitable for independent or modern hotels seeking flexibility.
HotelTime PMS is a cloud-based, versatile platform with over 430 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 rating, and 51 unique features. Its active support, broad integrations, and scalability make it the clear choice for hotels aiming to improve operations and guest experiences.
If your hotel is part of Hilton and your priority is brand consistency, Hilton OnQ might seem appealing—but the technology’s limitations and user dissatisfaction suggest otherwise. For most hotels looking for a modern, reliable PMS, HotelTime’s extensive capabilities and proven user satisfaction make it the preferred choice.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Hilton OnQ e HotelTime PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Melhor classificado em
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Hilton OnQ e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Hilton OnQ oferece 6 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 1.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Hilton OnQ: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Hilton tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos