The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 165 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Net Affinity se destaca em customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Conversion Widgets and Fully Customizable Themes.
ROIBACK se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Website Personalization.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 165 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 156 | 9 |
Apos analisar 165 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Net Affinity mais valorizam suporte ao cliente, booking_engine_facilidade_de_uso, construtor de sites, enquanto os usuarios do ROIBACK destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking_engine_facilidade_de_uso
▾
|
|
|
+
Construtor de sites
▾
|
|
|
+
Marketing digital
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Interface_CMS
▾
|
|
|
−
Problemas_com_cms
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Design de Websites para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 53 avaliacoes | #26 0 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #5 87 avaliacoes | #17 3 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #8 5 avaliacoes | #13 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #6 3 avaliacoes | #7 2 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 61 avaliacoes | #20 3 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #6 69 avaliacoes | #17 3 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #6 43 avaliacoes | #14 2 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #6 8 avaliacoes | #16 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #13 3 avaliacoes | #27 1 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #4 148 avaliacoes | #17 1 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | #12 0 avaliacoes | #5 3 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | #4 4 avaliacoes | #8 1 avaliacoes |
Choosing a website builder for your hotel involves considering ease of use, feature set, support quality, and cost. Net Affinity and Roiback both aim to improve your online presence and direct bookings but approach these goals differently. Your team needs to evaluate which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and digital strategy. Are you seeking a more integrated, feature-rich solution or a visually compelling website that drives conversions?
Both products solve the core problem of creating engaging, high-converting hotel websites. However, Net Affinity emphasizes customization, digital marketing tools, and extensive reporting, while Roiback focuses on visual appeal and customer engagement. Which of these priorities aligns more with your hotel’s goals?
Ultimately, the decision hinges on your specific needs: Do you want a comprehensive platform with strong marketing and analytics? Or a creatively designed website optimized for conversions? Let’s compare the two more closely.
Net Affinity, with its higher review volume and more recent feedback, is clearly the more established choice. It boasts a 4.84/5 overall rating from 103 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, responsive support, and ability to increase bookings. Customers praise its user-friendly booking engine, customizable CMS, and in-depth analytics, which help optimize digital marketing campaigns.
Roiback, however, has fewer reviews—only 8 with no recent feedback—and lacks an overall rating. Its reviews mainly commend the team’s support and the website’s visual design, but the limited, older data makes it less reliable. Do you prioritize a proven, well-reviewed platform or are you comfortable with a less-reviewed solution? Given the current review count and recency, Net Affinity’s track record makes it the stronger candidate.
Where do these products diverge? Net Affinity offers more features, including conversion widgets, customizable themes, and a blog post composer, whereas Roiback emphasizes website visual appeal and personalized design. Both are highly rated on ease of use, but Net Affinity’s broader functionality and more extensive partner integrations make it a more comprehensive option for most hotels.
In conclusion, if your hotel values a well-supported, feature-rich platform with recent positive reviews, Net Affinity is the clear choice. But if your focus is exclusively on a visually striking site that emphasizes aesthetic and guest engagement, Roiback could still be appealing—though limited data makes it less certain.
Edge: Net Affinity.
If your hotel needs a platform that enhances digital marketing efforts, provides in-depth reporting, and supports a variety of integrations, go with Net Affinity. Its extensive feature set (more than 13 unique features), large partner network, and proven track record of increasing direct bookings make it suitable for hotels aiming for growth and detailed analytics.
If your hotel prioritizes a visually engaging website designed to convert visitors at first glance, Roiback is a strong candidate. Its focus on personalized, attractive websites helps hotels stand out online, especially those targeting younger or experience-driven guests. However, it offers fewer features and integrations, so it’s better suited if aesthetic appeal is your top priority.
For hotels with a moderate to large digital marketing budget seeking a full-service platform, Net Affinity’s broader capabilities—such as conversion widgets, a blog composer, and extensive support—make it the more pragmatic choice. Conversely, if your hotel relies heavily on visual storytelling and simple website management, Roiback’s streamlined approach might suffice.
If you want a reliable, feature-rich solution backed by recent reviews and high ratings, choose Net Affinity. For a more design-focused, less complex site, Roiback could work, but with less confidence due to limited recent feedback.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s platform is rated 4.55/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive booking engine and user-friendly website builder. Customers mention that the backend CMS, while generally good, can sometimes be less straightforward—particularly with image resizing and navigation—yet overall, it remains accessible.
Roiback’s platform is rated 4.5/5 and receives praise for its visual design and straightforward management interface. Users find it simple to create attractive websites, especially with its focus on personalized, engaging layouts that appeal to guests.
Edge: Net Affinity. Its broader user base and recent reviews demonstrate a slightly more refined user experience, especially for hotels needing a versatile platform that combines ease of use with powerful features.
Net Affinity offers 16 features, including conversion widgets, customizable themes, blog post composer, and in-depth reporting tools. Its features aim to support digital marketing, content management, and conversion optimization, making it a comprehensive platform.
Roiback provides 14 features, emphasizing website visual design and guest engagement. Its standout feature is website personalization, which helps craft compelling, tailored guest experiences. However, it lacks some of the marketing and content management features present in Net Affinity.
Given the feature count and variety, Net Affinity’s broader toolkit makes it the more capable platform for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution. Roiback’s strength lies in its design focus rather than extensive functionality.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s customer support is rated 4.85/5, with reviews highlighting prompt responses and personalized assistance. Many hoteliers mention their account managers—Deirdre, Julie, Maja, Laura—as key to implementing and optimizing their websites and marketing campaigns.
Roiback’s support is rated 4.38/5, with reviews praising the team’s professionalism, quick response times, and helpfulness. Users appreciate their ongoing improvements and support, although fewer recent reviews make it harder to gauge current support quality.
Edge: Net Affinity. The higher rating and more recent reviews suggest it offers superior, more reliable support.
Net Affinity integrates with 62 verified partners, including major OTAs, PMS, and marketing tools like GuestCentric, Cendyn, Triptease, and TrustYou. This extensive network allows hotels to connect their website with key systems and marketing channels seamlessly.
Roiback, with 27 verified partners, offers integrations with platforms such as RoomRaccoon, Winhotel, STAAH, and others. While useful, its partner network is less extensive, limiting options for some hotels.
Given the broader integration ecosystem, Net Affinity provides more flexibility for hotels that rely on multiple third-party tools.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s reviews from recent months give it a 4.84/5 overall rating. Hoteliers across segments—luxury, boutique, city center—commend its ease of use, support, and ability to boost bookings, with many reviews emphasizing its effectiveness and dedicated account management.
Roiback’s reviews are scarce and not recent, with no overall rating available. The few reviews praise their support and the website’s visual appeal but lack sufficient recent feedback to compare meaningfully.
Based on recent data, Net Affinity is rated higher by hoteliers.
Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s pricing starts at $200 per month, with no free tier, implementation fee, or trial. Its straightforward monthly fee makes budgeting predictable, but the total cost depends on additional features or support packages.
Roiback does not publish specific pricing details, which suggests their quotes are customized based on hotel size and needs. This lack of transparency makes direct cost comparison impossible, but the absence of published pricing may be a drawback for budget-conscious hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or on a tight budget, or if your primary goal is a simple, visually appealing website without extensive marketing tools.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive marketing features, detailed analytics, or integrations with a broad range of partners.
Net Affinity offers a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform with extensive features, integrations, and solid support, making it ideal for hotels that want a versatile solution with proven results. Its ability to boost direct bookings through digital marketing, analytics, and content management is well documented.
Roiback specializes in creating visually striking websites that focus on guest engagement and conversion, best suited for hotels emphasizing aesthetics and guest experience. However, its limited recent reviews and narrower feature set make it less suitable for hotels needing a full digital marketing suite.
If your hotel needs a dependable, feature-rich website builder backed by recent, positive feedback, choose Net Affinity. If your priority is a stunning, personalized website with a focus on guest attraction, Roiback has potential, but consider the limited review data.
Final recommendation: For most hotels, especially those with growth ambitions or complex needs, Net Affinity is the safer, more proven choice. Roiback could serve smaller or visually driven hotels but with less certainty.
Os precos de Design de Websites raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Net Affinity (Website Builder) e Roiback | Hotel Web Development compartilham 13 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Compositor de postagens de blog | ||
| Personalização de site | ||
| Temas totalmente personalizáveis | ||
| Widgets de conversão |
Analisamos 2 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"I am very happy with the collaborative relationship we have with Net Affinity and the results we have seen together. There reporting on both marketing and e-commerce give us great..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The new website offers a more agile, intuitive, and personalized user experience. We wanted our website to reflect our corporate identity, our hotels, and our differential value pr..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
O suporte ao cliente da Net Affinity é amplamente destacado por ser rápido, profissional e útil. Gerentes de conta como Deirdre e Julie são frequentem... O suporte ao cliente da Net Affinity é amplamente destacado por ser rápido, profissional e útil. Gerentes de conta como Deirdre e Julie são frequentemente mencionados pelo nome por seu serviço e expertise excepcionais.
O mecanismo de reservas da Net Affinity é frequentemente elogiado por sua facilidade de uso, interface intuitiva e capacidade de criar e aprimorar ofe... O mecanismo de reservas da Net Affinity é frequentemente elogiado por sua facilidade de uso, interface intuitiva e capacidade de criar e aprimorar ofertas e pacotes facilmente. Vários usuários mencionam sua navegação direta e impacto positivo em reservas diretas.
O construtor de sites Net Affinity é descrito como amigável ao usuário, permitindo que os hoteleiros façam alterações rapidamente. Os usuários também... O construtor de sites Net Affinity é descrito como amigável ao usuário, permitindo que os hoteleiros façam alterações rapidamente. Os usuários também notam a variedade de modelos disponíveis e o impacto positivo geral no desempenho do site.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Embora o CMS da Net Affinity seja geralmente apreciado por sua personalização e facilidade de uso, vários usuários o consideram menos intuitivo. As cr... Embora o CMS da Net Affinity seja geralmente apreciado por sua personalização e facilidade de uso, vários usuários o consideram menos intuitivo. As críticas incluem dificuldades em navegar no backend, redimensionar imagens e alternar entre o mecanismo de reserva e o CMS.
Alguns usuários acham o CMS do Net Affinity difícil, com reclamações sobre a intuitividade do backend, taxas de carregamento e compatibilidade com red... Alguns usuários acham o CMS do Net Affinity difícil, com reclamações sobre a intuitividade do backend, taxas de carregamento e compatibilidade com redimensionamento de fotos. Melhorias como uma interface mais amigável e recursos integrados são sugeridos.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Net Affinity (Website Builder) e Roiback | Hotel Web Development compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Website Design, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Net Affinity (Website Builder) oferece 62 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Roiback | Hotel Web Development oferece 27. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Net Affinity (Website Builder) lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 4.3/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Net Affinity (Website Builder): Nao. Roiback | Hotel Web Development: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Website Design oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Net Affinity tem um HT Score de 42 e ROIBACK tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos