The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 69 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Onyx CenterSource se destaca .
ROH se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (0.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 69 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 69 |
Apos analisar 69 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Onyx CenterSource mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do ROH destacam automation of payments and invoicing, interface amigável, treinamento e suporte. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface amigável
▾
|
|
|
+
Treinamento e suporte
▾
|
|
|
+
Relatórios e notificações em tempo real
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Capacidades de integração
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de processamento de pagamentos para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) | — | #3 2 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #4 13 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 21 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #2 25 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #2 34 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 28 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #3 4 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #2 61 avaliacoes |
| Europa | — | #3 1 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel can significantly impact your operational efficiency, cash flow, and guest experience. Onyx CenterSource and ROH both aim to automate and streamline transactions, but their offerings differ dramatically. While Onyx CenterSource has limited recent reviews and a low overall rating, ROH stands out with a high review count and recent positive feedback. This stark contrast begs the question: which product truly suits your hotel’s needs?
The core difference lies in their approach—Onyx CenterSource provides a broad B2B payments platform with a focus on global hotel relationships, whereas ROH specializes in automating guest payments and invoicing with a user-friendly interface. Their capabilities reflect these focuses, making their suitability vary based on your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic goals.
Are you prioritizing a well-supported, highly-rated platform with recent reviews? Or are you looking for a more feature-rich, flexible solution that’s proven to deliver results? Let’s explore how these two options stack up across key areas to help you make an informed decision.
Onyx CenterSource and ROH serve different hotel segments and operational needs, though both aim to streamline payments. Onyx CenterSource, founded in 2013, boasts a global reach with over 150,000 properties and facilitates more than $2 billion in payments annually, but it has zero recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating—indicating a lack of recent user feedback and likely minimal current user satisfaction.
ROH, by contrast, has 65 reviews with a 100/100 HTR score and recent feedback from 10 reviews within the last six months. Hotels report that ROH’s ease of use and support are excellent, with a 4.97/5 customer support rating and a 4.84/5 value score, making it the more trusted and proven choice among current users.
Given these differences, your decision hinges on whether you need a broad, global payments platform (Onyx) or a highly-rated, guest payment automation system (ROH). Do your hotel’s priorities align more with sophisticated business intelligence and global relationships or with simplified, efficient payment management? The choice depends on your specific operational needs.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use platform that minimizes staff training and maximizes guest satisfaction, ROH is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface, highly recent positive reviews, and features like payment splitting, pay-by-link, and recurring payments make it ideal for hotels focused on operational simplicity and guest experience.
Onyx CenterSource is better suited for large, complex hotel networks or global operations that require extensive B2B payment relationships. Its focus on commission payments and business intelligence fits hotels with extensive partner networks or those seeking detailed financial reporting, but its lack of recent reviews makes its current usability and support less certain.
For most hotels seeking a reliable, modern payments solution, ROH’s current review strength and feature set make it the more practical choice. If your hotel’s needs are primarily operational and guest-centric, ROH should be your go-to.
ROH shines with a 4.95/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews from 10 users, who describe it as "amazing" and "extremely user friendly." Multiple reviewers highlight how it simplifies finding payments and scheduling, with no questions from clients about platform use, making onboarding straightforward.
Onyx CenterSource, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use with no recent reviews, suggesting that current hotel users may find it difficult or outdated. Its limited user feedback and the absence of recent testimonials imply that staff adoption and onboarding could be a challenge.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 unique features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, acceptances of Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, American Express, and Diner’s Club, as well as chargeback management and PCI compliance. These features enable flexible, modern payment options and detailed transaction management.
Onyx CenterSource provides no notable features beyond its core payment processing capabilities, which are not explicitly detailed. Given the feature-rich nature of ROH, especially in payment options and management, it clearly surpasses Onyx CenterSource in functional depth.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s recent reviews rate its customer support at 4.97/5, with comments like "support staff is great" and "training is easy," reflecting high satisfaction and ease of onboarding. Its recent reviews also mention prompt support and smooth implementation.
Onyx CenterSource has a 0/5 support rating with no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current support quality. The absence of recent feedback suggests limited or outdated support experiences, which is critical for a payments platform.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality but has a total of 1 verified partner. Onyx CenterSource has two verified partners, Shiji Group and Stayntouch, but with limited details on their integration depth.
Despite Onyx’s slightly higher partner count, ROH’s integrations are more proven and recent, especially with Oracle Hospitality, a key industry player. However, neither platform has an extensive or varied integration ecosystem.
Edge: Onyx CenterSource (by a small margin).
ROH’s 65 reviews, predominantly recent, give it a near-perfect score of 100/100 and a likelihood to recommend of 99%. Hotels of various sizes, especially those seeking ease of use and strong support, rate it highly.
Onyx CenterSource has no recent reviews or ratings, reflecting a lack of current user satisfaction data. Without recent feedback, its rating is effectively unavailable, making ROH the clearly higher-rated choice.
Edge: ROH.
Onyx CenterSource does not disclose pricing details, and it does not offer a freemium or trial, suggesting a potentially high or customized price point. Its model likely involves bespoke quotes based on hotel size or network.
ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly base fee, with no mention of additional costs or per-room fees. This transparent pricing makes ROH accessible for hotels of varying sizes and budgets.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Onyx, ROH’s clear and predictable model is more appealing.
Edge: ROH.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
In essence, Onyx CenterSource and ROH serve very different hotel operations. Onyx’s strengths lie in global B2B relationships, commission management, and business intelligence, making it suitable for large, complex hotel networks. Its lack of recent reviews raises concerns about current usability and support, however, which diminishes its appeal.
ROH, with its recent 65 reviews and high scores, offers a straightforward, user-friendly platform ideal for hotels prioritizing guest payment automation, quick onboarding, and reliable support. Its 19 features and transparent pricing make it an accessible choice for most hotels seeking a modern payments solution.
For hotels that need a proven, highly-rated payment platform with a focus on ease and support, ROH is the definitive choice. Larger, global operations with complex partner relationships should consider Onyx, but only if they can verify ongoing support and usability.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and user satisfaction are your priorities, ROH is the clear winner. Its high ratings, feature set, and support quality make it the safer, more effective choice for most hotels today.
Os precos de Software de processamento de pagamentos raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Onyx CenterSource e ROH compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Captura Parcial | ||
| Divisão de pagamento | ||
| Gestão de reembolso | ||
| Pagamentos recorrentes | ||
| Pague por Link | ||
| Pré-autorizações |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 7 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
A ROH é constantemente elogiada por sua interface intuitiva, de fácil utilização tanto para funcionários do hotel quanto para clientes. A plataforma s... A ROH é constantemente elogiada por sua interface intuitiva, de fácil utilização tanto para funcionários do hotel quanto para clientes. A plataforma simplifica o processo de fazer e receber pagamentos, resultando em uma experiência de transação mais tranquila e maior satisfação entre os usuários.
Os usuários apreciam o treinamento inicial e o suporte contínuo da ROH, ajudando a garantir uma adoção tranquila do software. Isso é particularmente b... Os usuários apreciam o treinamento inicial e o suporte contínuo da ROH, ajudando a garantir uma adoção tranquila do software. Isso é particularmente benéfico para integrar novos usuários ou responder a consultas complexas de forma eficaz.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Embora o ROH ofereça benefícios significativos em termos de economia de tempo, vários usuários sugeriram melhorias na integração com sistemas hoteleir... Embora o ROH ofereça benefícios significativos em termos de economia de tempo, vários usuários sugeriram melhorias na integração com sistemas hoteleiros existentes, como PMS e software de vendas, para uma eficiência ainda maior. Isso inclui possível integração com Salesforce, Delphi e Opera.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Onyx CenterSource e ROH compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Payments Processing Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Onyx CenterSource oferece 2 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto ROH oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ROH lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Onyx CenterSource: Nao. ROH: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Payments Processing Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Onyx CenterSource tem um HT Score de 0 e ROH tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos