The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 69 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Paytm se destaca .
ROH se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (0.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 69 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 69 |
Apos analisar 69 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Paytm mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do ROH destacam automation of payments and invoicing, interface amigável, treinamento e suporte. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Paytm |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface amigável
▾
|
|
|
+
Treinamento e suporte
▾
|
|
|
+
Relatórios e notificações em tempo real
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Capacidades de integração
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de processamento de pagamentos para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Paytm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) | — | #3 2 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #4 13 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 21 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #2 25 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Paytm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #2 34 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 28 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #3 4 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Paytm |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #2 61 avaliacoes |
| Europa | — | #3 1 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Paytm by Paytm and ROH for your hotel’s payment processing needs hinges on your operational priorities. While Paytm promises broad availability, its lack of recent reviews and low ratings signal limited current support or reliability. In contrast, ROH boasts a robust reputation with high scores across usability, support, and value, underscored by recent reviews from a diverse range of hotel segments. Your decision should consider not just features but also real-world performance and ongoing support.
Both products aim to streamline hotel payments, but they diverge sharply in maturity, feature set, and user perception. Paytm appears to be an untested or underdeveloped solution with no recent reviews, while ROH is a well-established platform with a proven track record. Are you comfortable adopting a solution with limited recent feedback, or do you prefer a product with a clear, current endorsement from hospitality professionals?
Paytm and ROH serve the core function of hotel payments but differ significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. Paytm, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no detailed insights into its usability, support, or capabilities, raising questions about its current relevance. ROH, however, has accumulated 65 reviews in the last six months—more recent data that demonstrates consistent performance and high customer satisfaction.
ROH excels in ease of use, customer support, and value for money, with scores of 4.95/5, 4.97/5, and 4.84/5 respectively. It offers 19 features including refunds, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and multiple payment options, which are absent from Paytm’s minimal or nonexistent feature list. Given the high volume of recent reviews and the detailed feature set, ROH is evidently the more reliable and comprehensive solution today.
Considering these points, do you want to rely on a product with no recent feedback, or will you prioritize a platform with proven recent performance?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, feature-rich payments platform that can handle complex operations like refunds, pre-authorizations, and multi-channel payment acceptance, ROH is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for properties seeking automation, real-time reporting, and extensive integrations, which are critical for operational efficiency and cash flow management.
If, however, your hotel’s focus is on a basic payment collection system without the need for advanced features or ongoing support, and you’re willing to accept the risk of limited recent feedback, Paytm might suffice. Nonetheless, with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to confirm whether Paytm still meets industry expectations or offers adequate support.
For hotel operators prioritizing reliability, ongoing support, and feature depth, ROH’s recent review count and high ratings make it the safer and smarter pick. Conversely, if your hotel has minimal needs and is confident in unproven solutions, Paytm could be considered, though this approach carries risk.
ROH’s ease of use is highly praised, earning a 4.95/5 rating, with users describing it as “amazing,” “very user friendly,” and “the easiest way to send and receive payments.” Its intuitive interface, combined with onboarding scores of 4.92/5, suggests your team would adopt it quickly and with minimal training.
Paytm, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating with no reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Without recent feedback, there’s no assurance that Paytm offers an interface that hotel staff can adopt effortlessly.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers a comprehensive suite of 19 features, such as refunds, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, recurring payments, acceptance of Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, American Express, and chargeback management. These capabilities enable your team to handle complex transactions, automate invoicing, and improve cash flow management.
Paytm’s feature set is not detailed, suggesting it may lack the advanced capabilities that ROH provides. The absence of any unique or listed features further indicates it might be a basic or unverified solution.
Given the extensive feature list and proven flexibility, ROH clearly outperforms Paytm. If your hotel requires detailed payment management and automation, ROH is the superior choice.
Edge: ROH.
ROH enjoys a 4.97/5 support rating, with reviews highlighting its excellent support staff and smooth onboarding process. Users describe ROH’s support as “great,” and note that initial training makes adoption straightforward, which is vital for operational continuity.
Paytm has a 0/5 rating with no recent reviews, providing no current data about its support quality. Relying on a platform with unknown or unverified support could risk unresolved issues and operational delays.
Edge: ROH.
ROH features a dedicated integration with Oracle Hospitality and one verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution. While this is limited, the platform’s focus on hospitality-specific integrations suggests it’s designed to work well within hotel environments.
Paytm’s single verified partner indicates very limited integration options, which could hinder your ability to connect with PMS, sales, or other operational systems.
Given the importance of seamless system integration, ROH’s existing integrations give it an edge.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s 65 reviews in the last six months demonstrate high, consistent ratings, with users praising its ease of use and support. Support scores of nearly 5/5 and a Net Promoter Score of 9.91/10 underscore strong satisfaction.
Paytm has no reviews, leaving no recent user feedback or ratings. Without recent ratings or reviews, we cannot confidently assess user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences.
Therefore, ROH’s proven positive reputation makes it the clear favorite among hoteliers.
Edge: ROH.
Paytm’s pricing details are unavailable, with no mention of fees or plans. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to evaluate value or compare costs effectively.
ROH charges a base price of $100 per month, with no additional implementation or subscription fees. Its straightforward pricing model makes budgeting easier and aligns with the value provided by its extensive feature set.
Given the transparency and clarity of ROH’s pricing, it provides a better sense of value and cost control.
Edge: ROH.
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of recent reviews and detailed capabilities, Paytm is best suited for minimal needs or exploratory use.
Not ideal if:
ROH is designed for hotels prioritizing efficiency, automation, and robust payment features.
ROH offers a proven, feature-rich, and highly rated platform with recent reviews from satisfied users across multiple hotel segments. Its focus on automation, real-time reporting, and support aligns with operational needs for a modern hotel.
Paytm’s lack of recent feedback and limited feature description suggest it’s a less reliable option, especially for hotels that depend on automation and integration. Its absence of detailed user reviews makes risk assessment difficult.
For hotels seeking a dependable, scalable, and well-supported payments solution, ROH is the clear leader. If your needs are minimal and you’re willing to accept uncertainty, Paytm could be considered, but the safer choice remains ROH.
Os precos de Software de processamento de pagamentos raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Paytm |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Paytm e ROH compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Paytm |
|
|---|---|---|
| Captura Parcial | ||
| Divisão de pagamento | ||
| Gestão de reembolso | ||
| Pagamentos recorrentes | ||
| Pague por Link | ||
| Pré-autorizações |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 7 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
A ROH é constantemente elogiada por sua interface intuitiva, de fácil utilização tanto para funcionários do hotel quanto para clientes. A plataforma s... A ROH é constantemente elogiada por sua interface intuitiva, de fácil utilização tanto para funcionários do hotel quanto para clientes. A plataforma simplifica o processo de fazer e receber pagamentos, resultando em uma experiência de transação mais tranquila e maior satisfação entre os usuários.
Os usuários apreciam o treinamento inicial e o suporte contínuo da ROH, ajudando a garantir uma adoção tranquila do software. Isso é particularmente b... Os usuários apreciam o treinamento inicial e o suporte contínuo da ROH, ajudando a garantir uma adoção tranquila do software. Isso é particularmente benéfico para integrar novos usuários ou responder a consultas complexas de forma eficaz.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Embora o ROH ofereça benefícios significativos em termos de economia de tempo, vários usuários sugeriram melhorias na integração com sistemas hoteleir... Embora o ROH ofereça benefícios significativos em termos de economia de tempo, vários usuários sugeriram melhorias na integração com sistemas hoteleiros existentes, como PMS e software de vendas, para uma eficiência ainda maior. Isso inclui possível integração com Salesforce, Delphi e Opera.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Paytm e ROH compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Payments Processing Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Paytm oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto ROH oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ROH lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Paytm: Nao. ROH: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Payments Processing Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Paytm tem um HT Score de 0 e ROH tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos