roommaster HMS vs. TOTVS:
Qual e o Ideal para Voce?

The Decision

Choosing between roommaster HMS by Roommaster and TOTVS involves assessing their core strengths, usability, and how well they align with your hotel’s operational needs. While roommaster boasts a strong track record backed by over 129 reviews and recent feedback, TOTVS currently lacks publicly available reviews or market presence, making roommaster the more validated choice. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and maturity differ significantly.

Are you seeking a proven, extensively reviewed system with a broad feature set, or a less-established solution without sufficient user feedback? Let’s explore how these two options compare across key aspects.

Is roommaster HMS or TOTVS Better for Hotels?

Both products are designed to centralize hotel operations—reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and financials—yet their maturity levels are starkly different. roommaster offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform with over 69 features exclusive to it, compared to TOTVS, which provides no detailed feature list or third-party integrations publicly available. This gap suggests roommaster’s extensive ecosystem and proven functionality give it a clear advantage.

While roommaster’s reviews emphasize ease of use, customer support, and a strong market presence, TOTVS does not have recent reviews or a significant user base to validate its claims. The absence of market data and user feedback makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Do you want a system with verified success stories and active user feedback? Or are you still exploring options without solid proof of operation? The choice leans heavily toward roommaster.

roommaster HMS vs TOTVS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a proven property management system with a rich feature set, go with roommaster. Its 129 reviews, 4.32/5 overall rating, and recent feedback from users working across diverse hotel segments make it a trustworthy choice. For properties looking to maximize automation, improve operational efficiency, and access detailed reports, roommaster’s capabilities are well-documented and tested.

If your hotel is a small operation exploring new software options and is comfortable with an unverified system, TOTVS might be worth considering—though the lack of reviews or verified features makes it a risky choice. For now, roommaster’s established reputation and extensive feature coverage clearly set it apart for hotels seeking reliability and proven performance.

Is roommaster HMS or TOTVS Easier to Use?

roommaster’s user interface scores a 4.41/5 based on 129 reviews, with users describing it as intuitive and easy to train new staff on. The onboarding process enjoys a 4.22/5 rating, with many noting that new employees adapt quickly due to the system’s straightforward workflows and role-based dashboards.

In contrast, TOTVS has no publicly available review data or user ratings, leaving its ease of use unverified. Without feedback, it’s impossible to assess how intuitive or staff-friendly the platform is. Given the proven ratings and positive reviews for roommaster, the edge clearly goes to it.

Which Has Better Features: roommaster HMS or TOTVS?

roommaster’s 69 unique features include a robust property management system, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, guest CRM, native email marketing, automated night audit, integrated payment processing, and much more—many features essential for mid-sized and large hotels. It also offers modules like spa & wellness, gift vouchers, and ancillary revenue tracking, providing a comprehensive operational toolkit.

TOTVS, on the other hand, offers no detailed feature list or third-party integrations publicly. Its feature set remains unverified, and no unique or advanced modules are documented. For hotels seeking a feature-rich, all-in-one management platform, roommaster’s extensive catalog provides a decisive advantage.

Which Has Better Customer Support: roommaster or TOTVS?

roommaster’s technical support scores 4.34/5 from 129 reviews, with many users praising its prompt and helpful assistance. Review quotes mention "solid and professional support" and "great response time," emphasizing their satisfaction with ongoing service.

Because TOTVS has no available reviews or support ratings, it’s impossible to gauge its customer service quality. In software selection, proven support is critical—especially for complex hotel operations. Therefore, roommaster’s support reputation gives it the edge.

Which Has More Integrations: roommaster or TOTVS?

roommaster boasts 56 verified partners, including Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, Inntopia, and Otelier, among others. These integrations facilitate seamless connectivity with accounting, channel management, payment systems, and marketing tools, reducing operational friction.

TOTVS provides no publicly confirmed integrations or partner ecosystem, limiting confidence in its connectivity capabilities. For hotels that rely on a broad ecosystem of third-party systems, roommaster’s established integrations are a clear advantage.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: roommaster or TOTVS?

As of the latest reviews, roommaster enjoys a 4.32/5 overall rating based on 129 reviews, with recent feedback from 32 users in the last six months. Hotels across segments like independent, boutique, and resorts rate it highly, with an 89% likelihood to recommend.

TOTVS lacks any publicly available reviews or recent user feedback, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction. Given the data, roommaster’s high ratings and recent positive reviews confirm its standing among hoteliers.

How Much Do roommaster and TOTVS Cost?

roommaster’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no freemium or trial options mentioned. The fee appears to be a flat monthly rate, but details about additional costs or implementation fees are not specified.

TOTVS does not disclose pricing information, which complicates direct comparison. The absence of pricing details suggests that if you’re considering TOTVS, you’ll need to request a quote—adding uncertainty to your evaluation. roommaster’s transparent pricing offers a clearer picture of investment.

What Type of Hotel Should Use roommaster?

• Hotels seeking a comprehensive, all-in-one management system that covers reservations, channels, POS, revenue, and guest engagement.
• Properties that want real-time reporting and data-driven decision-making with over 270 built-in reports.
• Hotels that prioritize automation, guest communication, and integration with third-party systems.
• Teams that value a proven product with extensive user feedback and active support.
• Not ideal if your hotel is a small boutique with limited operational complexity or if you prefer a lightweight, minimal system.

What Type of Hotel Should Use TOTVS?

• Hotels that are comfortable exploring less-established software solutions without relying on extensive user reviews.
• Small properties or corporate teams willing to undergo a trial-and-error approach as they verify the system’s fit.
• Hotels with internal tech teams capable of testing and customizing software with limited external support.
• Not ideal if your hotel values proven track records, extensive features, and mature integrations—since none are confirmed for TOTVS.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

roommaster HMS stands out as a highly-rated, feature-rich hotel management system with a proven record of customer satisfaction. Its broad integration network, ease of use, and recent positive reviews make it suitable for mid-sized and larger properties seeking operational efficiency.

TOTVS, lacking verified customer feedback and detailed features, remains an unproven option. Unless your hotel has specific reasons to consider a less-established platform and can handle potential uncertainties, roommaster is the safer, more reliable choice.

In summary, if you want a tested, well-supported PMS with a comprehensive feature set, roommaster should be your primary option. For hotels prioritizing proven performance and extensive user validation, it’s the recommended solution.