The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 23 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
roommaster se destaca em ease of use and customer support .
Shiji Group se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments and Recurring Payments.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 23 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 23 | 0 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de processamento de pagamentos para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #2 6 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 7 avaliacoes | #9 0 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | #4 1 avaliacoes | #5 0 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #4 0 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 7 avaliacoes | #7 0 avaliacoes |
| Luxo | #5 0 avaliacoes | #6 0 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | #4 1 avaliacoes | #6 0 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | #4 0 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #4 14 avaliacoes | #7 0 avaliacoes |
| Europa | #5 0 avaliacoes | #8 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | #3 0 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between roommaster Payments by roommaster and Shiji Astral Payments by Shiji Group hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both promise to streamline payment processes, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market reach. Your team needs a solution that not only fits your operational model but also offers reliable support and integrations. So, which payment platform is the better fit for your hotel?
Both products aim to improve transaction efficiency, reduce manual work, and handle complex payment scenarios. However, roommaster Payments is more focused on integrating directly within PMS systems, especially for North American markets, whereas Shiji Astral Payments emphasizes broad payment method support and global scalability. Do you prioritize regional reliability or international features?
roommaster Payments is designed primarily for hotels that want a straightforward, integrated payment solution within their existing PMS environment. Its strength lies in automating deposits, pre-authorizations, and reconciliation, especially for properties in North America and regions where it has established its presence. The reviews highlight solid ease of use and strong customer support, but recent user feedback criticizes stability issues and system errors, especially after recent cloud platform upgrades.
Conversely, Shiji Astral Payments offers a broader set of features, supporting multiple currencies, a wide range of payment methods (including Apple Pay, Google Pay, Alipay, WeChatPay), and comprehensive security protocols. It is a cloud-native platform, ideal for hotels seeking global reach and multiple payment channels. However, it lacks user reviews, making it harder to gauge real-world performance and support quality. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s operational goals?
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-implement solution with proven support in North America and a focus on simplifying payment workflows within a PMS, go with roommaster Payments. Its 20 reviews, mostly recent, and high support ratings (4.45/5) demonstrate strong user satisfaction in stability and support.
If your hotel operates across multiple regions, handles numerous currencies, and requires a diverse array of payment methods, Shiji Astral Payments is the better choice. Its extensive feature set—supporting over a dozen payment types and integrations with POS systems—makes it suitable for larger, international properties. However, the lack of user reviews indicates a need for careful evaluation before deployment.
roommaster Payments boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.4/5, supported by reviews praising its straightforward interface and simple onboarding process. Users report that staff can adapt quickly, and the system integrates well with the PMS, streamlining daily operations. However, recent reviews mention stability issues and system outages that hinder usability.
Shiji Astral Payments, being cloud-based, typically offers a modern interface with intuitive features, but no user reviews are available to confirm this. Its extensive payment method support might introduce complexity, especially during initial setup, which could impact staff adoption. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 15 unique features, including multi-currency settlements, dynamic currency conversion, and acceptance of diverse payment methods like AliPay, WeChatPay, and Apple Pay. Its integrations with POS and PMS systems further extend its capabilities, making it suitable for hotels seeking extensive flexibility.
roommaster Payments offers 13 shared features, focusing on core payment functions such as deposits, pre-authorizations, and dispute management. It does not support as many payment methods or currencies but excels in automating reconciliation and reducing manual effort within PMS environments. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments benefits from a support rating of 4.45/5, with reviews frequently praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Users report that support technicians are knowledgeable and available, often resolving issues quickly. However, some recent feedback indicates system outages and stability concerns that complicate support interactions.
Shiji Astral Payments, lacking review data, makes it difficult to assess support quality. Given its global scale, it likely offers 24/7 support; yet, without user feedback, hotel teams should proceed cautiously, especially during initial implementation. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including major vendors like Sage, GuestCentric, and Revinate. Its integrations focus on PMS, revenue management, and distribution channels, enabling a cohesive workflow for many North American hotels.
Shiji Astral Payments supports 64 verified partners, including popular systems like Oaky, Adyen, and SALTO. Its broader partner network reflects its aim to serve international markets with diverse needs. Both systems are well-connected, but Shiji’s wider partner ecosystem offers slightly more flexibility for varied hotel operations. Edge: Shiji Astral Payments.
roommaster Payments has accumulated 20 reviews in the last six months, with a high overall rating of 4.45/5 and an NPS score of 8.4/10, indicating strong recent satisfaction. Hoteliers in North America rate it highly for support and ease of use, despite some concerns about stability.
Shiji Astral Payments has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its international footprint and feature set are promising, but without recent feedback, hoteliers should approach cautiously. Therefore, edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments is priced at a flat $300 monthly fee, with no free trial or tiered pricing structures publicly available. Its cost is straightforward, but some users feel it is high given recent stability issues.
Shiji Astral Payments charges a base price of $200 per month, with no trial info provided. Its pricing suggests a more flexible or scalable model, likely reflecting its extensive features. Without detailed rates, your team should request customized quotes based on your hotel’s transaction volume and regional needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates across multiple countries or needs a wide array of payment methods, as the platform’s international features are limited.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely within North America with simple payment processing needs, as the platform’s extensive features may be unnecessary and more complex.
In essence, the core difference lies in the focus: roommaster Payments offers a reliable, North America-centric payment solution with high support ratings, while Shiji Astral Payments provides a versatile, globally oriented platform with extensive payment method options.
Choose roommaster Payments if your hotel values proven support, ease of use, and seamless PMS integration within North America, especially if stability is your priority. Opt for Shiji Astral Payments if your hotel operates internationally, needs multiple currencies, and wants a broad array of payment options—despite the lack of recent user reviews.
If your hotel prioritizes regional stability and support, roommaster Payments should be your go-to. However, if your operation demands flexibility, currency support, and global scalability, Shiji Astral Payments might be the better long-term investment.
In conclusion:
Your decision should reflect your operational landscape, regional needs, and support expectations.
Os precos de Software de processamento de pagamentos raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $200/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, roommaster Payments e Shiji Astral Payments compartilham 13 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aceita AliPay | ||
| Aceita American Express | ||
| Aceita Mastercard | ||
| Aceita Paypal | ||
| Conversão dinâmica de moeda (DCC) | ||
| Liquidações em várias moedas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 3 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 3 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Having a single PMS across our properties has allowed us to standardize operations while maintaining flexibility for individual hotel needs. This has significantly simplified train..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. roommaster Payments e Shiji Astral Payments compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Payments Processing Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. roommaster Payments oferece 56 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Shiji Astral Payments oferece 64. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. roommaster Payments lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
roommaster Payments: Nao. Shiji Astral Payments: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Payments Processing Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. roommaster tem um HT Score de 0 e Shiji Group tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos