The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,509 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Canary Technologies se destaca quando se trata de contactless check-in — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como PMS Integration and Network security.
Sezam24 se destaca em customer support and ROI .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,509 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 1,508 | 1 |
Apos analisar 1,509 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Canary Technologies mais valorizam contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, enquanto os usuarios do Sezam24 destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Notificações automáticas
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Integração Técnica
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Check-in sem contato para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #2 98 avaliacoes | #16 1 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 1042 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #1 228 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #1 105 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #1 573 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #1 680 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 116 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #1 1308 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #3 65 avaliacoes | #16 1 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #1 27 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #2 11 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Canary Contactless Check-In and Sezam24 hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to modernize your check-in process, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and target hotel types. Canary offers a comprehensive guest management platform with a focus on automation, upselling, and security, while Sezam24 emphasizes quick, self-service check-in kiosks designed for efficiency. Which solution aligns better with your operational goals?
Both products address the desire for contactless check-in, but their approaches differ. Canary Technologies provides a full-fledged guest management platform that integrates with your existing PMS, offering features like digital authorization, guest messaging, and upselling, all within a modular setup. Sezam24, by contrast, focuses on self-service kiosks that enable guests to check in and receive room keys independently, bypassing front desk interactions entirely. Do you prefer a broad guest engagement system or a streamlined check-in kiosk?
Canary has a higher review count (1391 reviews) and recent feedback, making its data more robust and current. Sezam24 has just a single review but maintains a 5/5 rating, indicating strong satisfaction but limited data. If your hotel values ongoing support, proven adaptability, and a feature-rich solution, Canary’s larger user base and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice. Are you looking for a comprehensive platform or a straightforward check-in kiosk?
If your hotel needs a flexible, integrated guest management system capable of handling multiple touchpoints—from pre-arrival messaging to upselling—go with Canary Technologies. Its broad feature set, including PMS integration and security tools, suits hotels aiming to enhance guest experience while increasing revenue. If operational simplicity and quick deployment are your priorities, and you want a dedicated self-service kiosk solution, Sezam24 is the way to go, especially for small, budget-friendly properties.
Hotels that prioritize automation, guest communication, and revenue opportunities should choose Canary. Its versatility allows for tailored solutions across luxury, boutique, and branded hotels. Conversely, Sezam24 is ideal for hotels that want to implement quick, self-serve check-in kiosks with minimal fuss, especially in small or budget settings. Is your focus on a comprehensive guest engagement platform or a quick, standalone check-in solution?
Canary’s UI scores 4.82/5, and many reviews highlight its user-friendly interface that staff and guests find intuitive. Onboarding typically takes around 20 minutes, with numerous reviews praising the straightforward setup and quick staff adoption. Sezam24, rated 5/5 and supported by glowing reviews, emphasizes simplicity, with a focus on self-service kiosks that guests operate independently. Its dedicated kiosk interface is designed for ease of use, requiring minimal staff training.
While Canary offers a broader suite requiring some integration effort, its interface remains highly rated for simplicity. Sezam24’s focus on kiosk usability makes it the easier option for properties seeking fast implementation without extensive staff training. Edge: Sezam24.
Canary boasts 17 shared features with other guest management tools, plus 9 unique capabilities such as PMS integration, threat lifecycle management, automatic translations, and pre-arrival upselling. These allow for personalized guest interactions, security, compliance, and revenue boosts, making it a versatile platform.
Sezam24, with only one core product, offers a streamlined self-service check-in kiosk that allows guests to check in with their booking number and receive keys. It’s simple but lacks the advanced communication, upselling, or security features found in Canary. For feature depth and flexibility, Canary edges ahead, especially with its integrated guest engagement tools.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
Canary’s support ratings stand at 4.69/5, with numerous reviews praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Hoteliers frequently mention the helpfulness of its customer service in troubleshooting integration issues and customizing the platform.
Sezam24, with a perfect 5/5 support rating based on limited reviews, appears highly satisfactory from current user feedback. However, the lack of recent or extensive reviews makes it harder to gauge ongoing support quality at scale. Given Canary’s larger, more recent review base, it demonstrates a proven track record of reliable support. Edge: Canary Technologies.
Canary’s overall rating is 4.68/5 with 368 reviews in the last 6 months, indicating consistent, recent positive feedback. Hotels across various segments, including luxury, boutique, and branded properties, rate it highly, often citing its efficiency and revenue impact.
Sezam24, with a perfect 5/5 and only one review, cannot be reliably compared across a broad hotel base. The limited data suggests strong satisfaction but lacks the robustness of Canary’s recent, diverse feedback. Based on review volume and recency, Canary’s ratings are more indicative of ongoing performance.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $300, with no freemium, monthly, or implementation fees listed. Their straightforward pricing models make comparison easy; however, actual costs may vary based on additional modules or integrations.
Since both are similarly priced, your decision should depend on the value derived from features and support rather than cost alone.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or only needs a simple check-in kiosk.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced communication, upselling, or security features.
Canary Contactless Check-In provides a comprehensive, well-supported guest management system suited for hotels seeking to enhance the entire guest journey. Its extensive feature set and recent high ratings make it the more reliable choice for properties of all sizes aiming to boost revenue and guest satisfaction.
Sezam24 offers a straightforward, cost-effective self-service check-in kiosk ideal for small, budget-friendly hotels that want a quick fix with minimal setup. Its simplicity and high user satisfaction are appealing, but it lacks the breadth of features that Canary provides.
If your hotel values a flexible, integrated platform with proven support and recent reviews, go with Canary. If you need a quick, dedicated self-check-in solution for a small property, Sezam24 is a suitable alternative.
Os precos de Check-in sem contato raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Canary Contactless Check-In e Sezam24 compartilham 17 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Auditoria de conformidade PCI | ||
| Gerenciamento do ciclo de vida de ameaças | ||
| Integração PMS | ||
| Prontidão de conformidade | ||
| Segurança de rede | ||
| Teste de penetração |
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
Embora muitos tenham considerado a plataforma da Canary fácil de usar, vários usuários relataram problemas com a integração com seus Sistemas de Gestã... Embora muitos tenham considerado a plataforma da Canary fácil de usar, vários usuários relataram problemas com a integração com seus Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades (PMS) existentes e sugeriram que melhorias nessa área facilitariam ainda mais as operações.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Canary Contactless Check-In e Sezam24 compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Contactless Check-in, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Canary Contactless Check-In oferece 54 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Sezam24 oferece 9. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Sezam24 lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Canary Contactless Check-In: Nao. Sezam24: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Contactless Check-in oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Canary Technologies tem um HT Score de 100 e Sezam24 tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos