The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 888 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
AbodeBooking se destaca em ease of use and customer support .
Mews se destaca quando se trata de ease of use — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 888 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 1 | 887 |
Apos analisar 888 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do AbodeBooking mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| AbodeBooking |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | AbodeBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #58 1 avaliacoes | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | AbodeBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #63 1 avaliacoes | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | AbodeBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between AbodeBooking and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, scale, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they serve different hotel profiles and offer varying levels of features and support. Given the stark difference in reviews and recent user feedback, Mews clearly stands out as the more proven and scalable solution.
Are you ready to prioritize a system rated highly by industry professionals and thousands of users over a niche, less-reviewed platform? Let’s compare both to see which better suits your property.
AbodeBooking’s platform is a single property management system with only one recent review, which limits its reliability and credibility. Meanwhile, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with 98 from the last six months, indicating active user engagement and ongoing development.
Both solutions claim to simplify booking management, but Mews offers a more extensive suite of features and integrations, evidenced by its 59 unique features not found in AbodeBooking. Does your hotel need a mature, well-supported platform with broad ecosystem connections?
If your hotel operates across multiple properties, needs a wide array of integrations, or plans for rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. Its extensive partner ecosystem and scalability make it ideal for boutique hotels, chains, or properties aiming for digital transformation.
If your hotel is very small, with minimal operational complexity and limited budget, and you prioritize ease of use over advanced features, AbodeBooking’s simple interface might be tempting. However, its lack of recent reviews and limited feature set make it less suitable for ambitious or multi-property hotels.
AbodeBooking’s UI scores a perfect 5/5, with users highlighting its intuitiveness and flexibility. Its onboarding process is also rated highly, with a straightforward setup that suits small operations or digital-savvy teams.
Mews, though slightly behind with a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating, benefits from a modern, clean interface praised by users for its clarity and responsiveness. Its onboarding is rated 4.39/5, but positive reviews emphasize that staff can adopt the platform quickly, even in complex environments.
Edge: AbodeBooking.
Mews outshines AbodeBooking by offering 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, advanced revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, mobile housekeeping, and over 1,000 integrations via its marketplace. It also features automation tools like automated reminders, digital registration, and task management.
AbodeBooking provides no unique features documented in the review data, lacking the advanced capabilities necessary for larger or more complex properties. For a feature-rich experience that supports growth, Mews is the superior choice.
Edge: Mews.
AbodeBooking scores a perfect 5/5 in support and onboarding, with reviews describing their support as "great," "instant," and "very flexible." With only one recent review, feedback is limited but highly positive.
Mews’s 4.27/5 support rating reflects solid, responsive assistance, with many users praising their quick bug resolution and proactive onboarding. However, some recent reviews mention occasional bugs, though these are addressed swiftly.
Edge: AbodeBooking.
Mews offers 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, providing extensive flexibility for diverse tech ecosystems. Its open API and marketplace foster customization for hotels of all sizes.
AbodeBooking has no verified integrations, which significantly limits its adaptability and future-proofing. For hotels relying on third-party tools or seeking a connected platform, Mews’s ecosystem is unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Since AbodeBooking has only one review—giving it a 0/5 rating—its credibility is minimal. Conversely, Mews has a 4.62/5 rating from 679 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Mews’s high ratings are especially meaningful in the context of recent reviews, indicating active, satisfied users across multiple hotel types and sizes. If reliable reviews matter, Mews is the clear winner.
Edge: Mews.
AbodeBooking does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a custom quote or potentially limited cost structures. Mews charges a $900 monthly base fee, with no implementation or extra costs disclosed, making its pricing transparent and predictable for larger-scale operations.
For small hotels or those with tight budgets, the lack of clear pricing from AbodeBooking is a concern, while Mews’s transparent model allows for better budgeting and ROI assessments.
Given its limited features and minimal recent review data, AbodeBooking is best suited for very small, independent properties with minimal operational complexity and no immediate plans for growth.
Mews’s broad feature set and active user community make it ideal for dynamic properties aiming to modernize their operations and enhance guest experiences.
Mews offers a comprehensive, well-supported platform with a vast ecosystem of integrations, proven to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its large, recent review base provides confidence for hotels looking to scale and innovate.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich system capable of supporting growth and multi-property management, go with Mews. Its seamless automation, extensive integrations, and active support make it the logical choice.
Choose AbodeBooking only if you run a very small property, prioritize simplicity, and do not require extensive integrations or scalability. Its limited features and minimal recent reviews make it unsuitable for hotels with growth ambitions or complex operational needs.
In summary, for most hoteliers evaluating a modern PMS, Mews stands out as the more dependable, scalable, and well-reviewed platform—essential for future-proofing your property’s operations.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| AbodeBooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, AbodeBooking e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | AbodeBooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. AbodeBooking e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. AbodeBooking oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. AbodeBooking lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
AbodeBooking: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. AbodeBooking tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos