The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Alacer se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Alacer mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Alacer |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Alacer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Alacer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Alacer |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Alacer by Alacer and Mews PMS involves evaluating two very different solutions. While Alacer aims to serve as a revenue management tool, Mews offers a comprehensive cloud-based property management system. Your team needs to consider whether you want an advanced revenue optimization tool or a flexible operational platform.
Alacer's limited review data and zero recent reviews make it difficult to gauge its current performance. In contrast, Mews has over 750 reviews with a recent surge of 98, making it a more tested and trustworthy choice. Are you ready to focus on a proven, feature-rich system?
Alacer positions itself as a revenue management system, primarily targeting hotels looking to optimize pricing and profits through advanced algorithms. It appears to lack core property management features, which are essential for daily operations.
Mews, on the other hand, is a fully cloud-based PMS with extensive features across reservations, guest management, billing, and operations. It boasts over 336 verified integrations and a suite of tools for automation, POS, and guest engagement. Given the data, Mews directly addresses the full scope of hotel management, unlike Alacer, which seems more specialized.
Do you want a tool that handles operational workflows or one focused mainly on revenue management?
If your hotel needs a complete, easy-to-use operational system that simplifies daily tasks and scales across multiple properties, go with Mews. Its high review count and recent positive feedback confirm its stability and usability for hotels of all sizes.
If revenue optimization is your primary concern and you can manage without integrated property operations, Alacer might appeal. However, with no recent reviews and no clear core functionality beyond revenue management, it's less reliable for ongoing hotel management needs.
Are you prioritizing operational efficiency or revenue maximization at this stage?
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with nearly 100 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff adoption. Users describe it as "modern," "thoughtful," and "adaptable," with some noting that staff can learn the system quickly without extensive training.
Alacer's review rating is 0/5, with no recent feedback available. The absence of data suggests it may lack the user-friendliness and proven onboarding processes that Mews offers.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, channel management, digital registration, automated night audit, guest messaging, and more. Its extensive feature set is tailored for comprehensive hotel operation and guest engagement.
Alacer has no listed features beyond revenue management, limiting its utility to a narrow focus. It does not provide the operational tools that hoteliers need daily.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings stand at 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users appreciate the proactive assistance and quick bug resolution, contributing to smoother implementations.
Alacer's support quality cannot be assessed due to a lack of recent review data. The no-review stance suggests limited transparency and confidence in ongoing support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's ecosystem boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and many third-party tools via the Marketplace. This extensive network allows hotels to customize and extend their systems easily.
Alacer has zero verified partners listed, indicating minimal or no integration capabilities. Without connectivity options, it limits scalability and adaptability.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 stems from 758 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing high satisfaction across property types like boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties. Hoteliers praise its user interface, support, and scalability.
Alacer has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. The recent review count for Mews gives it a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Alacer's pricing is not publicly listed, leaving uncertainty about its cost structure. It might involve custom quotes or hidden fees.
Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no free tier or trial available. This transparent pricing aligns with its extensive feature set, but hotels should evaluate whether the value matches their budget.
Note: Consider the total cost of ownership and scalability when budgeting.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
Mews is a proven, all-encompassing PMS trusted by hundreds of hoteliers, with extensive recent reviews validating its capabilities and support. Its feature set, integrations, and user satisfaction make it the clear choice for most hotels aiming for operational excellence and growth.
Alacer presents a narrow focus on revenue management, with limited evidence of ongoing support or usability. It might serve a specialized purpose but lacks the broad functionality and reliability that Mews offers.
For hotels seeking a robust, scalable platform with a track record of recent positive feedback, Mews is the definitive pick. If your core need is revenue optimization alone, and you can manage with limited operational tools, then Alacer might suffice—but caution is advised given the sparse recent review data.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Alacer |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Alacer e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Alacer |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Alacer e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Alacer oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Alacer: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Alacer tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos