The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Angelfish se destaca .
SiteMinder se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.3/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Performance Reporting and Mobile optimized/responsive.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 1,332 |
Apos analisar 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Angelfish mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do SiteMinder destacam channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, desafios no suporte ao cliente. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 470 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 527 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 96 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #1 50 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 564 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #1 411 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #1 230 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 174 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #2 157 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #5 266 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #1 418 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #3 13 avaliacoes |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel involves evaluating not just features but overall performance, support, and suitability for your property's size and market segment. Angelfish Software by Angelfish and SiteMinder Booking Engine are two options that aim to streamline your online reservations, but they differ significantly in maturity, scope, and user feedback.
While Angelfish targets a niche with a strong focus on website analytics and log analysis, SiteMinder offers a broad, well-established distribution and booking platform with extensive integrations and a large global user base. How do these differences influence your decision?
Angelfish Software is primarily known for its log analysis and website analytics, helping you understand your online traffic and user behavior. It does not function as a traditional booking engine but offers insights that can inform your digital marketing and booking strategies.
In contrast, SiteMinder’s booking engine is designed exclusively for online reservations, emphasizing direct bookings, multi-channel distribution, and seamless integration with PMS and other systems. With over 1,200 recent reviews and a high 4.48/5 overall rating, SiteMinder provides a well-rounded, mature solution.
Given the review volume and recent positive feedback, SiteMinder’s platform is clearly more trusted and proven. Are you looking for a robust, scalable booking system or deeper website analytics?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, easy-to-use booking platform with extensive integrations, SiteMinder is the clear choice. Its features support a variety of hotel types—from boutique to large resorts—and its user ratings reflect high satisfaction.
However, if your team’s focus is on understanding website traffic and user behavior to optimize marketing efforts rather than bookings directly, Angelfish’s analytics tools might be more relevant. Yet, with zero reviews and a negligible score, Angelfish cannot match SiteMinder’s credibility. For most hoteliers, SiteMinder offers more immediate value.
SiteMinder’s interface is rated 4.6/5 in ease of use, praised for its intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal learning curve. Its onboarding process in recent reviews has been described as smooth, with many users noting how quickly they adopted the platform.
Angelfish, on the other hand, has a 0/5 usability score and no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess. Based on the feedback, SiteMinder’s user experience is clearly superior, especially for hoteliers seeking a straightforward setup.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder offers 39 features, including room and rate filtering, performance reporting, rate intelligence, multi-currency support, multi-lingual capabilities, and advanced inventory management. Its open API and PMS connectivity enable deep integrations, making it a versatile choice.
Angelfish provides no additional features beyond website log analysis, focusing on data insights rather than booking functionalities. For a hotel looking to optimize direct reservations and manage online distribution, SiteMinder’s feature set is far more comprehensive.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder maintains a 4.43/5 support rating, with many reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpfulness. Property owners frequently mention how support staff assist with technical issues promptly, often citing real examples of quick resolutions.
Angelfish has no recent reviews or ratings related to support, making it impossible to judge. Given SiteMinder’s large user base and consistent feedback on support quality, it clearly leads in this area.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder boasts over 245 verified partners, including major OTAs, PMS systems like Duve, and a host of other distribution tools. Its extensive network simplifies multi-channel management and reduces manual workload.
Angelfish, with just 3 verified partners, offers extremely limited integration options, primarily focused on log data analysis rather than distribution or booking management. For expanding connectivity and automation, SiteMinder is the superior choice.
Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s recent reviews and high 4.48/5 rating, along with a 9.08/10 NPS score, reflect strong user satisfaction. Hotels across segments, from boutique properties to resorts, praise its reliability, scalability, and ease of use.
Angelfish, with zero reviews and ratings, cannot be considered a trusted option. For your hotel’s confidence and proven performance, SiteMinder is the clear leader.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Angelfish does not publish pricing or offer a freemium model, making cost assessment difficult. It appears to be a niche product, possibly custom-priced or targeted at specific analytics needs.
SiteMinder’s booking engine starts at $500/month, with no additional implementation fees or per-room charges. Given its extensive features and proven track record, its pricing aligns with its value proposition.
Note: Exact pricing may vary based on the property’s size and needs.
Angelfish’s strength lies in analytics, not in managing reservations or distribution channels.
SiteMinder suits properties aiming to grow their online reservations and streamline operations.
SiteMinder’s booking engine is a mature, feature-rich platform that commands a large, satisfied user base. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and proven support make it the safer and more comprehensive choice for most hotels.
Angelfish offers specialized insights into website analytics but lacks the booking and distribution functionalities that most hoteliers need to drive revenue. Its limited reviews and absence of recent feedback make it a less reliable option.
For hotels prioritizing direct bookings, operational efficiency, and scalable growth, SiteMinder is the recommended solution. If your focus is on digital marketing insights and user behavior, Angelfish could supplement your strategy but not replace a dedicated booking engine.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Angelfish Software e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API aberta | ||
| Comparação da tarifa do quarto | ||
| Filtragem de tipo de quarto e tarifa | ||
| Filtros de compras de taxa rápida | ||
| Relatório de desempenho | ||
| Taxa de inteligência |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 27 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Angelfish Software e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Angelfish Software oferece 3 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto SiteMinder Booking Engine oferece 245. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. SiteMinder Booking Engine lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Angelfish Software: Nao. SiteMinder Booking Engine: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Angelfish tem um HT Score de 0 e SiteMinder tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos