The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 31 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Aro Digital Strategy se destaca em customer support and onboarding , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Blog Post Composer and Fully Customizable Themes.
ROIBACK se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 31 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 22 | 9 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Design de Websites para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) | #14 4 avaliacoes | #26 0 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #9 17 avaliacoes | #17 3 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | #18 1 avaliacoes | #13 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | — | #7 2 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #13 12 avaliacoes | #20 3 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #11 13 avaliacoes | #17 3 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #13 5 avaliacoes | #14 2 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #16 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #24 0 avaliacoes | #27 1 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #7 21 avaliacoes | #17 1 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #5 3 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #8 1 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right website design platform for your hotel involves evaluating each product’s ability to enhance your online presence, attract guests, and drive direct bookings. Both Aró Website Design by Aro Digital Strategy and Roiback | Hotel Web Development aim to meet these needs, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market focus. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and growth ambitions.
While Aró boasts more recent reviews and a stronger overall rating, Roiback’s extensive integration ecosystem and larger review base suggest different strengths. Which product will best support your hotel’s digital growth?
Both platforms address website creation and optimization, but they approach their offerings differently. Aró emphasizes bespoke design, content management, and conversion optimization, with a focus on luxury and boutique hotels. Roiback, by contrast, concentrates on conversion and visual appeal, with a broad suite of integrations and a more technical backend.
Aró provides a user-friendly CMS and unique features like drag-and-drop editing, SEO plugins, and fully customizable themes, all aimed at delivering visually stunning, high-performing websites. Roiback offers a comprehensive, multi-functional platform with a focus on performance analytics, rapid scalability, and extensive third-party integrations, making it suitable for hotels with complex needs or larger operations.
Where does your hotel’s primary need lie: bespoke design with a high degree of customization, or an integrated, scalable platform with extensive partner options? The choice depends on whether your priority is stylistic flexibility or operational depth.
If your hotel requires a visually compelling, user-centric website that emphasizes direct bookings and brand differentiation, Aró is the clear choice. Its feature set includes fully customizable themes, a drag-and-drop page builder, SEO tools, and a dedicated support team, making it ideal for boutique, luxury, or city-center hotels seeking a tailored online presence.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a platform with a broad network of integrations, robust analytics, and a scalable architecture to support multiple channels, Roiback is better suited. Its strength lies in its extensive partner ecosystem—27 verified integrations—and proven performance in driving sales for larger or more complex hotel groups.
Consider your hotel’s size, segment, and future growth plans: for boutique and luxury properties prioritizing bespoke design, go with Aró. For larger, multi-property brands requiring a scalable, integrated system, Roiback offers more extensive capabilities.
Aró’s platform scores a 4.73/5 for ease of use, with a straightforward Content Management System that hotel staff can quickly learn. Customer support is highly rated at 4.82/5, with reviews praising the prompt, professional assistance and dedicated account management. Onboarding is rated 4.81/5, indicating a smooth setup process.
Roiback follows closely with a 4.5/5 ease-of-use rating, supported by positive reviews that highlight their professional, friendly support team. However, some users note that its backend could benefit from re-categorization and simplification, especially for managing multiple services.
Edge: Aró Website Design for its higher ease-of-use score and more recent, positive reviews.
Aró offers five features exclusive to its platform: Blog Post Composer, Fully Customizable Themes, Whitelabel Capability, Drag and Drop Page Builder, and SEO Plugins. These features enable hotels to craft highly personalized, search-optimized websites with minimal technical skill.
Roiback provides 14 shared features across platforms but lacks the specialized design tools Aró offers. Its focus remains on performance, analytics, and integrations, with less emphasis on visual customization.
Edge: Aró Website Design, due to its unique design and content features tailored to hospitality branding.
Aró consistently receives outstanding support reviews, with a 4.82/5 rating and comments praising prompt, professional, and dedicated assistance. Customers highlight their support team's ongoing engagement and responsiveness, which is a significant advantage during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Roiback’s support is also rated highly at 4.38/5, with users appreciating their friendly, effective service. Nonetheless, some review comments suggest that support could be more consistent, especially in complex scenarios like rate management or backend customization.
Edge: Aró Website Design, for its higher support rating and more recent, positive feedback.
Aró’s reviews, though fewer in number (22), are recent and reflect a 95% likelihood to recommend, with high satisfaction across user segments. Its focus on personalized support and design excellence resonates particularly with luxury and boutique hotels.
Roiback, with just 8 reviews, has a lower recommendation rate at 84%. Larger hotel groups and multi-property brands seem to value its extensive integrations and performance analytics, but smaller hotels may find the platform overly complex.
Edge: Aró Website Design, due to recent reviews and higher customer satisfaction ratings.
Aró’s pricing starts at $1,200 per month, with no freemium or trial options listed. Its fixed pricing offers transparency for hotels planning a dedicated budget for website development and support.
Roiback’s pricing is not publicly listed, which is typical for platforms with extensive integrations and tailored solutions. Expect custom quotes based on your hotel’s size and needs, potentially making it harder to compare upfront.
In general, Aró provides clearer cost expectations, but larger hotels or multi-property groups might find Roiback’s custom pricing more appropriate for complex needs.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on third-party booking channels or requires a platform with extensive third-party integrations out-of-the-box.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or heavily reliant on bespoke design without needing extensive integrations.
Aró specializes in creating visually stunning, high-conversion websites tailored to boutique and luxury hotels. Its personalized design tools, dedicated support, and recent positive reviews make it a strong choice for properties seeking a unique online presence.
Roiback excels in providing a scalable, integrated platform with extensive third-party support, making it better suited for larger hotel groups or hotels with complex operational needs. Its vast partner ecosystem and proven sales performance support this.
If your hotel values bespoke aesthetics and direct control, go with Aró. For hotels focused on growth, integrations, and scalability, Roiback is the better option. Both platforms serve different hotel profiles, but based on recent reviews and support ratings, Aró leads in overall satisfaction for boutique and luxury segments.
Os precos de Design de Websites raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Aró Website Design e Roiback | Hotel Web Development compartilham 14 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Capacidade de Whitelabel | ||
| Compositor de postagens de blog | ||
| Construtor de páginas de arrastar e soltar | ||
| Plugins de SEO | ||
| Temas totalmente personalizáveis |
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The new website offers a more agile, intuitive, and personalized user experience. We wanted our website to reflect our corporate identity, our hotels, and our differential value pr..."
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Aró Website Design e Roiback | Hotel Web Development compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Website Design, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Aró Website Design oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Roiback | Hotel Web Development oferece 27. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Aró Website Design lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Aró Website Design: Nao. Roiback | Hotel Web Development: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Website Design oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Aro Digital Strategy tem um HT Score de 0 e ROIBACK tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos