The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 898 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
ASA Hotelsoftware se destaca em customer support and ROI , com funcionalidades exclusivas como On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Mews se destaca quando se trata de ease of use — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 898 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 11 | 887 |
Apos analisar 898 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do ASA Hotelsoftware mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #49 4 avaliacoes | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #43 6 avaliacoes | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #61 1 avaliacoes | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #51 2 avaliacoes | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #59 1 avaliacoes | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #39 2 avaliacoes | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #27 11 avaliacoes | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between ASA Hotelsoftware and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and strategic priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. ASA offers a more traditional, feature-rich platform with a strong presence in Europe, while Mews excels in cloud-based automation, integrations, and global reach. How do you decide which fits your hotel best?
ASA Hotelsoftware is a longstanding, award-winning solution with over 11 reviews in the last six months and a near-perfect overall rating of 5/5, making it highly endorsed by current users. It provides a comprehensive suite of modules, including unique features like Spa & Wellness and mobile device notes, appealing to resorts and larger properties. Conversely, Mews, with 758 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, is praised for its modern, cloud-native approach, extensive integrations, and scalable platform suited for diverse hotel types globally. Do you prioritize a proven, feature-heavy system or a flexible, innovative cloud platform?
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, on-premise solution with specific modules like spa management and detailed staff task features, ASA is the better fit. It’s favored by resorts and properties that need robust operational tools and are comfortable with traditional software deployment. But if you need a cloud-based platform with over 336 integrations, automation, and a global presence, Mews offers faster scalability and easier integration with third-party apps. For hotels seeking long-term growth and automation, Mews is the clearer choice.
ASA Hotelsoftware scores 4.73/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its straightforward, logical interface and helpful onboarding. Users appreciate its simple navigation, even for staff unfamiliar with hotel management systems. However, some note that implementing complex pricing models can be challenging, which might slow staff adoption initially. Mews slightly edges ahead with a 4.7/5 rating, praised for its intuitive, modern design and seamless cloud access, minimizing onboarding hurdles and encouraging quick staff adoption. Edge: Mews.
ASA boasts 43 shared features plus three exclusive modules: Spa & Wellness, On-premise deployment, and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks. Its unique features cater well to resorts or hotels with specialized needs. In contrast, Mews offers 16 features exclusive to its platform, including Booking Engine, Guest CRM, Channel Manager, and integrated CRS, supporting automation and guest engagement. While ASA covers more hotel-specific functions, Mews leads with automation and third-party connectivity. Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
ASA Hotelsoftware is highly rated at 4.73/5, with reviews praising its dedicated contact persons and ongoing support despite constant evolution. Users say, “ASA support is responsive and always available,” which fosters confidence in their operational continuity. Mews scores 4.27/5, with positive comments about its onboarding and ongoing support, but some reviews mention occasional bugs that are resolved swiftly. Given the recent reviews and higher ratings, ASA support currently outperforms Mews. Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
Mews's marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, with 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and guest apps. ASA, with 49 verified partners, covers essential integrations but lags behind Mews in breadth. Shared partners like Onity and RateBoard are common, but Mews’s extensive ecosystem enables more flexible tech stacks. For hotels prioritizing deep integration options, Mews is the better choice. Edge: Mews.
ASA’s ratings are stellar, with a 5/5 overall rating and a 10/5 NPS score based on recent reviews, mainly from resorts and larger properties in Europe. Mews, with a 4.62/5 rating and a 9.12/5 NPS, is highly regarded globally, especially among independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels. Recent feedback indicates Mews’s ease of use and automation resonate strongly. For overall user satisfaction, ASA holds a slight edge due to its higher ratings. Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
ASA’s base price is $1,000 with no trial or freemium options, reflecting its traditional licensing model. Mews charges $900 as a base fee, also without a free trial, but its cloud-based nature means more scalable pricing options might be available through custom quotes. Both platforms lack transparent tiered pricing publicly, so costs depend on property size and modules. For straightforward budgeting, Mews’s slightly lower entry point may appeal, but detailed quotes are recommended.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ASA Hotelsoftware is a solid choice for established, larger properties or resorts that need extensive operational modules and prefer local deployments. Its high review scores and specialized features make it suitable for hotels with complex management needs. Mews, on the other hand, is ideal for modern, tech-savvy hotels aiming for automation, quick scalability, and broad integrations, especially in dynamic, multi-property portfolios.
Choose ASA if your hotel values detailed local control and comprehensive modules. Opt for Mews if you prioritize cloud flexibility, automation, and a wide ecosystem that supports innovation. For most hotels today, Mews’s recent growth, high reviews, and rapid feature evolution make it the stronger pick.
This detailed comparison should help you confidently decide which PMS aligns best with your hotel’s goals and operational model.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ASA Hotel Software e Mews PMS compartilham 43 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Gerente de canal | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de spa e bem-estar | ||
| Na premissa | ||
| Notas e tarefas do dispositivo móvel (voz para texto) | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 7 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Capacidades exclusivas
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ASA Hotel Software e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ASA Hotel Software oferece 49 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ASA Hotel Software lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 4.7/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ASA Hotel Software: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. ASA Hotelsoftware tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos