The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 18 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Asana se destaca .
LIKE MAGIC se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile access on any device.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 18 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 2 | 16 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Ferramentas de Colaboração da Equipe para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #14 1 avaliacoes | #7 7 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #25 1 avaliacoes | #16 5 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #19 2 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #17 5 avaliacoes |
| Luxo | #26 1 avaliacoes | #24 2 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | #26 1 avaliacoes | #25 1 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #8 8 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #32 1 avaliacoes | #33 0 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #23 1 avaliacoes | #6 15 avaliacoes |
When evaluating staff collaboration tools for your hotel, you face a choice between Asana and LIKE MAGIC. Both aim to improve team coordination and streamline operations, but they serve different needs. Asana is a well-established project management platform, while LIKE MAGIC is a hotel-specific, automation-driven guest experience platform. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products address operational inefficiencies, but they approach the problem differently. Asana focuses on task and project management for teams, whereas LIKE MAGIC automates guest interactions and routine tasks. Are you looking to enhance internal collaboration or guest-facing automation? That’s the core question.
The more recent reviews and the higher review count favor LIKE MAGIC. With 16 reviews in the last six months and a 99% likelihood to recommend, LIKE MAGIC’s data is more current and reliable. Asana’s only two reviews, both older, make its ratings less representative of today’s performance. So, which product do you trust more based on recent user feedback?
Both products aim to improve operational workflows, but they are designed for different aspects of hotel management. Asana offers a simple, flexible tool for task tracking and team communication, suitable for various industries but not purpose-built for hospitality. LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, is a dedicated hotel operations platform that automates guest interactions from booking to checkout.
Asana’s core strength lies in its ability to organize internal team tasks, with a 4/5 ease-of-use rating and mostly positive reviews about managing communication and teamwork. It’s used mainly by standard hotels and is appreciated for its versatility in non-hotel settings. However, its lack of hotel-specific features and integrations can be a drawback.
LIKE MAGIC excels in automating guest journeys with 12 unique features, including digital check-in, in-room dining, and automated messaging. Its 5/5 ease of use rating and near-perfect customer support score (4.88/5) reflect its hotel-specific design, making it ideal for properties seeking to reduce staff and enhance guest experiences. Which platform better suits your hotel’s operational focus?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
If your hotel needs a dedicated platform to automate guest interactions and reduce staffing costs, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its automation features—integrations with PMS, digital keys, guest messaging, and self-service capabilities—are unmatched and designed specifically for hotel operations.
If your team primarily needs a straightforward project management tool to organize internal tasks and improve communication, Asana is suitable, especially for hotels with smaller or less complex operations. However, given its limited hotel-specific features and the small volume of recent reviews, it’s less ideal for hotels aiming for digital guest experience enhancements.
For properties focused on internal team productivity without guest-facing automation, Asana could suffice. But for hotels committed to automating guest journeys and operational workflows, LIKE MAGIC offers a comprehensive, purpose-built solution. Which aligns with your immediate needs?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s interface is rated 4/5 and is praised for being simple and open, helping teams adopt the platform with some training. Its onboarding score (3/5) indicates a decent experience but may require internal effort to standardize usage across teams.
LIKE MAGIC’s interface scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with a nearly perfect onboarding score of 4.93/5. Its hotel-specific design minimizes staff training time and reduces onboarding friction, especially for properties with limited tech experience.
Based on recent reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s intuitive platform and quick setup give it a notable edge for hotels seeking rapid deployment without extensive training.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana offers 0 unique hotel-specific features, focusing mainly on task tracking, communication, and project management. Its strengths lie in general collaboration tools, but it lacks automation for guest services or operational workflows.
LIKE MAGIC provides 12 distinct features tailored for hospitality, including work prioritization, real-time task tracking, file libraries, automated replies, multi-property monitoring, and an open API. These features directly support automating guest interactions, staff workflows, and service delivery, making it the more feature-rich choice for hotels.
Given the hotel-specific features and integrations, LIKE MAGIC clearly stands out. If you need automation and guest journey management, it offers more relevant tools.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s customer support score of 2.5/5 reflects mixed reviews. Some users find it difficult to get timely help, and onboarding can be inconsistent, requiring additional internal effort.
LIKE MAGIC boasts a support rating of 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and dedicated assistance. Hotel clients praise the platform’s ongoing product evolution and attentive support, which enhances their operational confidence.
For hotels prioritizing reliable, responsive support, LIKE MAGIC’s high rating makes it the preferable option.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with hotel systems directly. This can restrict its usefulness in a hotel environment where seamless data flow is essential.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including PMS systems like 4SUITES, apaleo, and Mews, as well as payment and guest messaging platforms. These integrations streamline operations and reduce manual data entry.
If integrations are crucial for your hotel’s technology ecosystem, LIKE MAGIC’s broader connectivity provides a significant advantage.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s reviews are limited and older, with a 4.5/5 overall rating based on only 2 reviews. Its users appreciate its simplicity but note its lack of hotel-specific features.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews, totaling 16 in the last six months, give it a 4.88/5 customer support score and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across Europe and Asia Pacific, particularly extended stay and boutique properties, praise its automation and operational efficiencies.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s user ratings are more indicative of current performance and satisfaction.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana does not publicly disclose pricing, and it offers a free basic version limited to small teams. Larger teams or advanced features require custom pricing, which can be costly and complex to scale.
LIKE MAGIC charges a flat fee of $1,100 per month, with no free tier or trial. This fee grants access to its full suite of hotel-specific features and integrations.
For clarity and predictability, LIKE MAGIC’s straightforward pricing makes it easier for hotels to budget and evaluate ROI.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Asana is suitable for basic internal collaboration but less so for automating guest services.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
LIKE MAGIC is best for hotels committed to digital guest experience transformation.
The core difference lies in their purpose: Asana is a general project management tool, while LIKE MAGIC is tailored for hotel operations automation. If your priority is internal team collaboration without guest-facing features, Asana might suffice, but it lacks hotel-specific integrations and automation.
Choose Asana if your team needs a flexible internal collaboration platform and your hotel’s operations are simple. However, for hotels seeking to streamline guest interactions, automate workflows, and reduce staffing, LIKE MAGIC provides a more suitable, hotel-centric solution.
When to choose Asana: You’re focused on internal team productivity, have a small team, and don’t require guest automation. When to choose LIKE MAGIC: Your goal is to automate guest journeys, reduce staffing costs, and integrate seamlessly with your property systems.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction through automation, LIKE MAGIC is the stronger choice. Its recent reviews, hotel-specific features, and broader integrations make it the more reliable, future-proof solution.
Os precos de Ferramentas de Colaboração da Equipe raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Asana e LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de tarefas em tempo real | ||
| Check-outs tardios | ||
| Diário de bordo virtual | ||
| Gestão de caso | ||
| Priorização de trabalho | ||
| Suporte à biblioteca de arquivos (imagens, documentos e vídeos) |
Analisamos 4 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
Melhor classificado em
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Asana e LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Staff Collaboration Tools, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Asana oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) oferece 10. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Asana: Nao. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App): Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Staff Collaboration Tools oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Asana tem um HT Score de 0 e LIKE MAGIC tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.